A site is acceptable for license termination under restricted
conditions if it meets the criteria below.
(1) The residual levels associated with
restricted conditions are ALARA or the licensee can demonstrate that further
reductions in residual radioactivity to comply with the provisions of Rule
64E-5.222, F.A.C., would result
in an increase in public or environmental harm. Determination of the ALARA
levels must take into account any detriments such as traffic accidents
potentially expected to result from decontamination and waste
disposal.
(2) The licensee has made
provisions for legally enforceable institutional controls that provide
reasonable assurance that the total effective dose equivalent from residual
radioactivity distinguishable from background to the average member of the
critical group will not exceed 25 millirem (0.25 mSv) per year.
(3) The licensee has provided sufficient
financial assurance to enable an independent third party including a
governmental custodian of a site to assume and carry out responsibilities for
any necessary control and maintenance of the site. Acceptable financial
assurance mechanisms are:
(a) Funds sufficient
to pay decommissioning costs placed into an account segregated from the
licensee's assets and outside the licensee's administrative control before the
start of decommissioning operations, or
(b) A bond as specified in Rule
64E-5.217, F.A.C., or
(c) An arrangement deemed acceptable by the
governmental entity that is assuming custody and ownership of a
site.
(4) The licensee
has submitted a decommissioning or license termination plan as specified in
subsection
64E-5.214(2),
F.A.C., to the department indicating the licensee's intent to decommission in
accordance with this part and specifying that the licensee intends to
decommission by restricting use of the site. The licensee shall document in the
license termination or decommissioning plan how the advice of individuals and
institutions in the community who could be affected by the decommissioning has
been sought and incorporated, as appropriate, following analysis of that
advice.
(a) Licensees proposing to
decommission by restricting use of the site shall seek advice from such
affected parties regarding the following matters:
1. Whether provisions for institutional
controls proposed by the licensee:
a. Will
provide reasonable assurance that the total effective dose equivalent from
residual radioactivity distinguishable from background to the average member of
the critical group will not exceed 25 millirem (0.25 mSv) per year,
b. Will be enforceable; and,
c. Will not impose undue burdens on the local
community or other affected parties.
2. Whether the licensee has provided
sufficient financial assurance to enable an independent third party including a
governmental custodian of a site to assume and carry out responsibilities for
any necessary control and maintenance of the site.
(b) In seeking advice on the issues
identified in paragraph (a), above, the licensee shall provide for:
1. Participation by representatives of a
broad cross section of community interests who could be affected by the
decommissioning,
2. An opportunity
for a comprehensive, collective discussion on the issues by the participants
represented; and,
3. A publicly
available summary of the results of all such discussions including a
description of the individual viewpoints of the participants on the issues and
the extent of agreement or disagreement among the participants on the
issues.
(5)
Residual radioactivity at the site has been reduced so that if the
institutional controls were no longer in effect there is reasonable assurance
that the total effective dose equivalent from residual radioactivity
distinguishable from background to the average member of the critical group is
as low as reasonably achievable and would not exceed 100 millirem (1 mSv) per
year.