Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 391-3-7-.11 - Coastal Marshlands Buffer Variance Procedures and Criteria
(1) Buffers on
state waters are valuable in protecting and conserving land and water
resources. Therefore, there is established a 25 foot buffer along coastal
marshlands, as measured horizontally from the coastal marshland-upland
interface, except:
(a) Where the Director
determines to allow a variance that is at least as protective of natural
resources and the environment under the variance criteria in
391-3-7-.11(2) through
(7) or under the variance by rule criteria in
391-3-7-.11(9);
or
(b) Where otherwise allowed by
the Director pursuant to O.C.G.A §
12-2-8; or
(c) Where an alteration within the buffer
area has been authorized pursuant to O.C.G.A. §
12-5-286; or
(d) For maintenance of any currently
serviceable structure, landscaping, or hardscaping, including bridges, roads,
parking lots, golf courses, golf cart paths, retaining walls, bulkheads, and
patios; provided, however, that if such maintenance requires any
land-disturbing activity, adequate erosion control measures are incorporated
into the project plans and specifications and such measures are fully
implemented; or
(e) Where a
drainage structure or roadway drainage structure is constructed or maintained;
provided, however, that adequate erosion control measures are incorporated into
the project plans and specifications and such measures are fully implemented;
or
(f) On the landward side of any
currently serviceable shoreline stabilization structure; or
(g) For the maintenance of any manmade
storm-water detention basin, golf course pond, or impoundment that is located
entirely within the property of a single individual, partnership, or
corporation; provided, however, that adequate erosion control measures are
incorporated into the project plans and specifications and such measures are
fully implemented; or
(h) Crossings
for utility lines that cause a width of disturbance of not more than 50 feet
within the buffer; provided, however, that adequate erosion control measures
are incorporated into the project plans and specifications and such measures
are fully implemented; or
(i) Any
land-disturbing activity conducted pursuant to and in compliance with a valid
and effective land-disturbing permit issued subsequent to April 22, 2014, and
prior to December 31, 2015; provided, however, that adequate erosion control
measures are incorporated into the project plans and specifications and such
measures are fully implemented; or
(j) Any lot for which the preliminary plat
has been approved prior to December 31, 2015 if roadways, bridges, or water and
sewer lines have been extended to such lot prior to the effective date of this
Act and if the requirement to maintain a 25 foot buffer would consume at least
18 percent of the high ground of the platted lot otherwise available for
development; provided, however, that adequate erosion control measures are
incorporated into the project plans and specifications and such measures are
fully implemented.
(2)
The buffer variance process will apply to all projects legally eligible for
variances, provided that adequate erosion control measures are incorporated in
the project plans and specifications and are implemented. Variance applications
will be reviewed by the Director only in the following cases:
(a) The project involves the construction or
repair of an existing infrastructure project or a structure that, by its
nature, must be located within the buffer. Such structures include, but are not
limited to, dams, public water supply intake structures, detention/retention
ponds, waste water discharges, docks including access ways, boat launches
including access ways and stabilization of areas of public access to water;
or
(b) The project will result in
the restoration or enhancement to improve water quality and/or aquatic habitat
quality; or
(c) Buffer intrusion is
necessary to provide reasonable access to a property or properties;
or
(d) The intrusion is for utility
lines within or adjacent to existing utility or transportation right of ways or
that cannot reasonably be placed outside the buffer, and crossings and
vegetative disturbance are minimized; or
(e) Crossing for utility lines, including but
not limited to gas, liquid, power, telephone, and other pipelines, provided
that the number of crossings and the amount of vegetative disturbance are
minimized; or
(f) Recreational foot
trails and viewing areas, providing that impacts to the buffer are minimal;
or
(g) The project involves
construction of one (1) single family home for residential use by the owner of
the subject property and, at the time of adoption of this rule, there is no
opportunity to develop the home under any reasonable design configuration
unless a buffer variance is granted. Variances will be considered for such
single family homes only if construction is initiated or local government
approval is obtained prior to January 10, 2005; or
(h) The proposed land disturbing activity
within the buffer is part of a project that will require a permit from the
United States Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972,
33 U.S.C. Section
1344, or Section
10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1899, contingent upon approval by the Corps of Engineers of that permit;
or
(i) A plan is provided for
buffer intrusion that shows that, even with the proposed land disturbing
activity within the buffer, the completed project will result in maintained or
improved water quality; or
(j)
(Reserved)
(k) The proposed land
disturbing activity within the buffer is part of a project that is not eligible
for a permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404
of the federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972,
33 U.S.C. Section
1344, and involves:
1. Piping, filling, or re-routing of waters
that are not jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.; or
2. Buffer impacts due to new infrastructure
projects adjacent to state waters (jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional Waters
of the U.S.). This criterion shall not apply to maintenance and/or modification
to existing infrastructure.
(3) Except as provided in
391-3-7-.11(9), if
the buffer impact will be minor, the buffer variance request shall include the
following information at a minimum:
(a) Site
map that includes locations of all state waters, wetlands, floodplain
boundaries and other natural features, as determined by field survey.
(b) Description of the shape, size,
topography, slope, soils, vegetation and other physical characteristics of the
property.
(c) Dated and numbered
detailed site plan that shows the locations of all structures, impervious
surfaces, and the boundaries of the area of soil disturbance, both inside and
outside of the buffer. The exact area of the buffer to be impacted shall be
accurately and clearly indicated.
(d) Description of the project, with details
of the buffer disturbance, including estimated length of time for the
disturbance and justification for why the disturbance is necessary.
(e) Calculation of the total area and length
of the buffer disturbance.
(f)
Letter from the issuing authority (if other than the Division and as
applicable) stating that the issuing authority has visited the site and
determined the presence of coastal marshlands that require a buffer and that a
buffer variance is required.
(g)
Erosion, sedimentation and pollution control plan.
(h) Re-vegetation plan as described in the
most recent publication of the Division's guidance book, "Streambank and
Shoreline Stabilization", or the "Hydromodification Best Management Practice
Manual for Coastal Georgia," and/or a plan for permanent vegetation as per the
"Manual for Erosion and Sedimentation Control in Georgia."
(i) For projects within the buffer of or
upstream and within one linear mile of an impaired water body on Georgia's
"305(b)/303(d) List Documents (Final)," documentation that the project will
have no adverse impacts relative to the pollutants of concern and if
applicable, documentation that the project will be in compliance with the TMDL
Implementation Plan(s).
(j)
Applications must be on the most current forms provided by the
Division.
(4) If the
buffer impact will be major, the buffer variance request shall include all of
the information in
391-3-7-.11(3)(a) through
(i) above, with the exception of
391-3-7-.11(3)(h).
A buffer variance request for major buffer impacts shall also include the
following additional information:
(a) For
variance requests made under
391-3-7-.11(2)(h):
1. Joint Public Notice (JPN), if it is an
individual permit;
2.
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), if it is a Nationwide Permit;
3. Mitigation calculations; and
4. Permit approval from the United States
Army Corps of Engineers or, if not yet received, a signed statement from the
applicant certifying that the applicant will provide a copy of the permit
approval upon receipt.
(b) Buffer mitigation plan addressing impacts
to critical buffer functions, including water quality and floodplain, watershed
and ecological functions based on an evaluation of existing buffer conditions
and predicted post construction buffer conditions pursuant to
391-3-7-.11(7)(c)
herein.
(c) Plan for stormwater
control once site stabilization is achieved, when required by a local
stormwater ordinance.
(d) For
variance requests made under
391-3-7-.11(2)(i),
the application shall include the following water quality information:
1. Documentation that post-development
stormwater management systems to conform to the minimum standards for water
quality, channel protection, overbank flood protection and extreme flood
protection as established in the Georgia Stormwater Management Manual or the
equivalent and if applicable, the Coastal Stormwater Supplement to the Georgia
Stormwater Management Manual.
2.
Documentation that existing water quality will be maintained or improved based
on predicted pollutant loading under pre- and post-development conditions as
estimated by models accepted by the Division.
(e) For variance requests made under
391-3-7-.11(2)(k)1.,
the application shall include documentation from the United States Army Corps
of Engineers verifying the water bodies identified in the application are
non-jurisdictional waters of the United States under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act.
(5) Upon
receipt of a complete application, the Division shall consider the complete
application and the following factors in determining whether to issue a
variance:
(a) Locations of state waters,
wetlands, coastal marshlands, floodplain boundaries and other natural features
as determined by field surveys.
(b)
Shape, size, topography, slope, soils, vegetation and other physical
characteristics of the property.
(c) Location and extent of buffer
intrusion.
(d) Whether reasonable
alternative project designs, such as the use of retaining walls are possible
which do not require buffer intrusion or which require less buffer
intrusion.
(e) Whether issuance of
the variance, with the required mitigation plan, re-vegetation plan and/or plan
for permanent vegetation, is at least as protective of natural resources and
the environment.
(f) The current
condition of the existing buffer, to be determined by:
1. The extent to which existing buffer
vegetation is disturbed;
2. The
hydrologic function of the buffer; and
3. Hydrologic functional characteristics such
as bank vegetative cover, bank stability, or prior channel
alteration.
(g) The
extent to which the encroachment into the buffer may reasonably impair buffer
functions.
(h) The value of
mitigation activities conducted pursuant to this rule, particularly
391-3-7-.11(7)(c) and
(d) herein, development techniques or other
measures that will contribute to the maintenance or improvement of water
quality, including the use of low impact designs and integrated best management
practices, and reduction in effective impervious surface area.
(i) The long-term water quality impacts of
the proposed variance, as well as the construction impacts. And for
applications made under
391-3-7-.11(2)(i),
the following criteria shall be used by the Director to assist in determining
whether the project seeking a variance will, when completed and with approved
mitigation, result in maintained or improved water quality downstream of the
project and minimal net impact to the buffer:
1. The Division will assume that the existing
water quality conditions are commensurate with an undeveloped maritime forested
watershed unless the applicant provides documentation to the contrary. If the
applicant chooses to provide baseline documentation, site specific water
quality, habitat, and /or biological data would be needed to document existing
conditions. If additional data are needed to document existing conditions, the
applicant may need to submit a monitoring plan and have it approved by the
Division prior to collecting any monitoring data. Existing local data may be
used, if available and of acceptable quality to the Division.
2. The results of the predicted pollutant
loading under pre- and post-development conditions as estimated by models
accepted by the Division indicate that existing water quality conditions will
be maintained or improved.
(j) For applications made under
391-3-7-.11(2)(i),
for which a land disturbing activity is proposed within the buffer of a 303(d)
listed water body, or upstream and within one linear mile of a 303(d) listed
water body, the results of the model demonstrate that the project has no
adverse impact relative to the pollutants of concern.
(6) Within 60 days of receipt of a complete
buffer variance application, the Division will either provide written comments
to the applicant or propose to issue a variance.
(a) When the Division proposes to issue a
variance, it will issue a public notice. The public notice shall describe the
proposed buffer encroachment, the location of the project, where the public can
review site plans, and where comments should be sent. The public shall have 30
days from the date of publication of the public notice to comment on the
proposed buffer variance.
(b) If
after the public comment period for a proposed buffer variance has closed or a
buffer variance has been issued the applicant proposes to change the project as
described in the variance application, the applicant must notify the Division
in writing of those proposed changes.
1. If
the proposed changes include a change in the location of the buffer impacts, an
increase in buffer impact, or change in project concept or design such that
there may be a change to the applicable variance criteria described in Section
391-3-7-.11(2) and
the Division approves such changes, the Division shall issue public notice in
accordance with Section
391-3-7-.11(6)(a).
2. If the proposed changes do not include
changes described in
391-3-7-.11(6)(b)(1),
the Division may approve those changes in writing or may elect to issue public
notice in accordance with Section
391-3-7-.11
(6)(a).
(c) If after the public comment period for a
proposed buffer variance has closed or a buffer variance has been issued a
person or entity other than the applicant wishes to carry out the work
described in the proposed variance or variance, the new person or entity must
submit an application for that variance and all other requirements and
procedures described in this Section
391-3-7-.11 shall apply. A new
application shall not be required where the applicant is merely changing its
name or corporate structure, but the applicant must notify the Division in
writing of that name or corporate structure change.
(7) In all cases in which a buffer variance
is issued, the following conditions shall apply:
(a) The variance shall be the minimum
reduction in buffer width necessary to provide relief.
(b) Disturbance of existing buffer vegetation
shall be minimized.
(c) Mitigation
is required for all major buffer impacts and shall offset the buffer
encroachment and any loss of buffer functions. Where lost functions cannot be
replaced, mitigation shall provide other buffer functions that are beneficial.
Buffer functions include, but are not limited to:
1. temperature control (shading);
2. bank stabilization;
3. trapping of sediments, if any;
4. removal of nutrients, heavy metals,
pesticides and other pollutants;
5.
aquatic habitat and food chain;
6.
terrestrial habitat, food chain and migration corridor;
7. buffering of flood flows; and
8. maintenance of salinity through buffering
of freshwater flows.
(d)
Mitigation should be on-site when possible. Depending on site conditions,
acceptable forms of mitigation may include, but are not limited to:
1. Restoration of the buffer to a naturally
vegetated state to the extent practicable, or to current existing conditions.
Information on natural vegetation in coastal Georgia is available from the
University of Georgia Marine Extension Service's website (visit
https://gacoast.uga.edu/ and
search the terms "Ecoscapes" or "Native Plant Search Engine");
2. Bioengineering of channels to reduce bank
erosion and improve habitat;
3.
Creation or restoration of wetlands;
4. Stormwater management systems to better
maintain the pre-development flow regime (with consideration given to
downstream effects) that exceeds the requirements of applicable ordinances at
the time of application;
5.
Reduction in pollution sources, such as on-site water quality treatment or
improving the level of treatment of septic systems;
6. Other forms of mitigation that protect or
improve water quality and/or aquatic wildlife habitat;
7. An increase in buffer width elsewhere on
the property;
8. Mitigation as
required under a Clean Water Act Section 404 or Nationwide permit issued by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; or
9.
Stormwater management systems described in the most recent publication of the
Georgia Stormwater Management Manual and the Coastal Stormwater Supplement to
the Georgia Stormwater Management Manual.
(e) Forms of mitigation that are not
acceptable include:
1. Activities that are
already required by the Georgia Erosion and Sedimentation Act, such as the
minimal use of best management practices;
2. Activities that are already required by
other federal, state and local laws, except as described in
391-3-7-.11(7)(d)
above. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mitigation is acceptable.
(f) The Division will not place a
condition on a variance that requires a landowner to deed property or the
development rights of property to the state or to any other entity. The
landowner may voluntarily preserve property or the development rights of
property as a mitigation option with the agreement of the Division.
(g) If a variance issued by the Director is
acceptable to the issuing authority, the variance shall be included as a
condition of permitting and therefore becomes a part of the permit for the
proposed land disturbing activity project. If a buffer variance is not
acceptable to the issuing authority, the issuing authority may issue a land
disturbing permit without allowing encroachment into the buffer.
(8) A buffer variance will expire
five years after the effective date, unless an extension is granted by the
Division as specifically provided herein.
(a)
The applicant may request a time extension of that buffer variance only if the
approved buffer impacts will not be completed prior to the buffer variance
expiration date. The buffer variance time extension, if granted, can be for a
period of up to five years. If the applicant can demonstrate that a time
extension for a period of greater than five years is reasonable, the Director
may grant a buffer variance time extension for a reasonable period of greater
than five years. A buffer variance time extension may be issued only
once.
(b) The buffer variance time
extension must be requested in writing at least 90 calendar days prior to the
buffer variance expiration date with justifiable cause demonstrated. Once an
approved buffer variance expires, it is no longer eligible for a time
extension.
(c) Time extension
requests will be reviewed by the Division. The Division will either provide
written comments to the applicant or propose to issue a buffer variance time
extension within 60 days of receipt of a time extension request. If there are
any significant changes to the original buffer variance application, the
Division shall issue a public notice in accordance with
391-3-7-.11(6)(a).
(9) Variance By Rule
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of
these Rules, the following activities have minimal impact on the water quality
or aquatic habitat of the adjacent coastal marshland and therefore are deemed
to have an approved buffer variance.
1.
Activities where the area within the buffer is not more than 500 square
feet.
2. Activities that have a
"Minor Buffer Impact" as defined in
391-3-7-.01(r),
provided that the total area of buffer impacts is less than 5,000 square feet.
A proposed development site may not be subdivided into smaller projects or
phases to circumvent the 5,000 square feet limitation.
(b) Bank and shoreline stabilization
structures are not eligible for coverage under the variance by rule.
(c) Notification shall be made at least 14
days prior to the commencement of land-disturbing activities to provide the
Division an opportunity to review the activity to ensure it meets the
applicable criteria. Unless notified by the Division to the contrary, an
applicant who submits a notification in accordance with
391-3-7-.11(9) is
authorized to encroach into the buffer 14 days after the notification form is
received by the Division. A buffer variance by rule expires if the buffer
impacts are not completed within two years after the notification form is
received by the Division. The Director may deny coverage under this variance by
rule and require submittal of an application for an individual variance based
on the review of the documentation submitted or other information. Persons
failing to notify the Director of such activities shall be deemed to be
operating without a variance.
(d)
Notification for a variance by rule is to be submitted by return receipt
certified mail (or similar service that provides confirmation of receipt) to
both the Division and to the Local Issuing Authority in jurisdictions
authorized to issue Land Disturbance Permits.
(e) An individual variance will be required
for any activity that does not qualify for a variance by rule.
(f) Any notification for a variance by rule
shall include the following:
1. Description
of the activity, with details of the buffer disturbance, including area and
length of the buffer to be impacted and estimated length of time for the
disturbance.
2. Photographs of the
area that will be affected by the proposed activity.
3. Notice of a land-disturbing activity to be
covered by a variance by rule must be on the most current forms provided by the
Division.
(g) Any
variance by rule shall be subject to the following requirements:
1. The following information shall be
maintained onsite until final stabilization of the site is complete:
i. Site plan that shows the locations of all
structures, impervious surfaces, and the boundaries of the area of soil
disturbance, both inside and outside of the buffer. The exact area and length
of the buffer to be impacted shall be accurately and clearly
indicated.
ii. Documentation that
adequate erosion control measures are incorporated into the project plans and
specifications.
2.
Disturbance of existing buffer vegetation shall be minimized.
3. Final stabilization of the site must
include a re-vegetation plan as described in the most recent publication of the
Division's guidance book, "Streambank and Shoreline Stabilization." It is
recommended that vegetation be native riparian vegetation.
4. Temporary vegetative measures must be
implemented within 14 calendar days following the completion of any soil
disturbance and the site shall be stabilized at the end of every day until
project completion.
5. Proper and
full implementation of the erosion control measures in
391-3-7-.11(9)(g)1.
ii.
6. Post construction stormwater
management practices should be considered. Best management practices can be
found in the latest edition of the Georgia Stormwater Management Manual or the
Coastal Supplement to the Georgia Stormwater Management Manual.
7. All other applicable federal, state, and
local laws, rules and ordinances, including erosion and sedimentation control
must be fully complied with prior to commencement of project
construction.
8. For a variance by
rule under
391-3-7-.11(9)(a)1.,
cumulative impacts shall not exceed 500 square feet within a 5 year
period.
9. Any activity that does
not meet the requirements of
391-3-7-.11(9)(g)
is in violation of the variance by rule.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.