(1)
General. The main
objective of a
Tier 1 site assessment is to reasonably determine the highest
concentrations of
chemicals of concern which would be associated with any
suspected or confirmed
release and an accurate identification of applicable
receptors. The potential source of a
release, nature of the substance released,
site stratigraphy, depth to groundwater, and other appropriate factors must be
considered when selecting the sample types, sample locations, and measurements
methods. The placement and depth of borings and the construction of monitoring
wells must be sufficient to determine the sources of all releases, the vertical
extent of contamination, an accurate description of site stratigraphy, and a
reliable determination of groundwater flow direction.
a.
Pathway assessment. The
pathways to be evaluated at Tier 1 are the groundwater ingestion pathway, soil
leaching to groundwater pathway, groundwater vapor to enclosed space pathway,
soil vapor to enclosed space pathway, soil to water line pathway, groundwater
to water line pathway and the surface water pathway. Assessment requires a
determination of whether a pathway is complete, an evaluation of actual and
potential receptors, and a determination of whether conditions are satisfied
for obtaining no further action clearance for individual pathways or for
obtaining a complete site classification of "no action required." A pathway is
considered complete if a chemical of concern has a route which could be
followed to reach an actual or potential receptor.
b.
Pathway clearance. If
contaminant concentrations for an individual pathway do not exceed the
applicable Tier 1 levels or if a pathway is incomplete, no further action is
required to evaluate the pathway unless otherwise specified in these rules. If
the contaminant concentrations for a pathway exceed the applicable Tier 1
level(s) in the "Iowa Tier 1 Look-up Table," the response is to conduct further
assessment under Tier 2 or Tier 3 unless an effective institutional control is
approved. In limited circumstances excavation of contaminated soils may be used
as an option to obtain pathway clearance. If further site assessment indicates
site data exceeds an applicable Tier 1 level(s) for a previously cleared
pathway or the conditions justifying a determination of pathway incompleteness
change, that pathway must be reevaluated as part of a Tier 2 or Tier 3
assessment.
c.
Chemical
group clearance. If concentrations for all chemicals of concern within
a designated group of chemicals are below the Tier 1 levels, no further action
is required as to the group of chemicals unless otherwise specified in these
rules. Group one consists of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes
(BTEX). Group two consists of naphthalene, benzo(a)pyrene, benz(a)anthracene
and chrysene; TEH default values are incorporated into the Iowa Tier 1 Look-Up
Table and Appendix A for group two chemicals.
d.
Site classification. A
site can be classified as no action required only after all pathways have met
the conditions for pathway clearance as provided in this rule.
e.
Groundwater sampling
procedure. Groundwater sampling and field screening must be conducted
in accordance with
department Tier 1 guidance. A minimum of three properly
constructed groundwater monitoring wells must be installed, subject to the
limitations on maximum drilling depths, for the purpose of identifying maximum
concentrations of groundwater contamination, suspected sources of releases, and
groundwater flow direction.
(1) Field
screening must be used to locate suspected releases and to determine locations
with the greatest concentrations of contamination. Field screening is required
as per department guidance at each former and current tank basin, each former
and current pump island, along the piping, and at any other areas of actual or
suspected releases. In placing monitoring wells, the following must be
considered: field screening data, available current and historical information
regarding the releases, tank and piping layout, site conditions, and drilling
data available from sites in the vicinity. At least one well must be placed at
each suspected source of release which shall include at a minimum: the pump
island with the greatest field screening level, each current and former
underground storage tank basin, and if field screening shows greater levels
than at the pump islands or tank basins, at other suspected sources of
releases. As a general rule, wells should be installed outside of the tank
basin through native soils but as close to the tank basin as feasible. A well
must be installed in a presumed downgradient direction and within 30 feet of
the sample with the greatest field screening level. Three of the wells must be
placed in a triangular arrangement to determine groundwater flow
direction.
(2) Where the
circumstances which prompt a Tier 1 assessment identify a discrete source and
cause of a release, and the groundwater professional is able to rule out other
suspected sources or contributing sources such as pump islands, piping runs and
tank basins, the application of field screening and groundwater well placement
may be limited to the known source.
f.
Soil sampling procedure.
The objective of soil sampling is to identify the maximum concentrations of
soil contamination in the vadose and saturated zones and to identify sources of
releases. The same principles stated above apply to soil sampling. Soil
samples
must be taken from borings with the greatest field screening levels even if the
boring will not be converted to a monitoring well. At a minimum, soil and
groundwater
samples must be collected for analysis from all borings which are
converted to monitoring wells.
Iowa Tier 1 Look-Up Table
Media
|
Exposure Pathway
|
Receptor
|
Group 1
|
Group 2: TEH
|
Benzene
|
Toluene
|
Ethylbenzene
|
Xylenes
|
Diesel*
|
Waste Oil
|
Groundwater (µg/L)
|
Groundwater Ingestion
|
Actual
|
5
|
1,000
|
700
|
10,000
|
1,200
|
400
|
Potential
|
290
|
7,300
|
3,700
|
73,000
|
75,000
|
40,000
|
Groundwater Vapor to Enclosed Space
|
All
|
1,540
|
20,190
|
46,000
|
NA
|
2,200,000
|
NA
|
Groundwater to Water Line
|
PVC or Gasketed Mains
|
7,500
|
6,250
|
40,000
|
48,000
|
75,000
|
40,000
|
PVC or Gasketed Service Lines
|
3,750
|
3,120
|
20,000
|
24,000
|
75,000
|
40,000
|
PE/PB/AC Mains or Service Lines
|
200
|
3,120
|
3,400
|
19,000
|
75,000
|
40,000
|
Surface Water
|
All
|
290
|
1,000
|
3,700
|
73,000
|
75,000
|
40,000
|
Soil (mg/kg)
|
Soil Leaching to Groundwater
|
All
|
0.54
|
42
|
15
|
NA
|
3,800
|
NA
|
Soil Vapor to Enclosed Space
|
All
|
1.16
|
48
|
79
|
NA
|
47,500
|
NA
|
Soil to Water Line
|
All
|
2.0
|
3.2
|
45
|
52
|
10,500
|
NA
|
NA: Not applicable. There are no limits for the chemical for
the pathway, because for groundwater pathways the concentration for the
designated risk would be greater than the solubility of the pure chemical in
water, and for soil pathways the concentration for the designated risk would be
greater than the soil concentration if pure chemical were present in the
soil.
TEH: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons. The TEH value is based
on risks from naphthalene, benzo(a)pyrene, benz(a)anthracene, and chrysene.
Refer to Appendix B for further details.
Diesel*: Standards in the Diesel column apply to all low
volatile petroleum hydrocarbons except waste oil.
(2)
Conditions requiring Tier 1 site
assessment. Unless owners and operators choose to conduct a Tier 2
assessment, the presence of
bedrock requires a Tier 2 assessment as provided in
135.8(5), or these rules otherwise require preparation of a
Tier 2 site
assessment, a
Tier 1 site assessment must be completed in response to
release
confirmation as provided in rule
567-135.6 (455B), or
tank
closure investigation under
567-135.15 (455B), or other
reliable laboratory analysis which confirms the presence of contamination above
the action levels in 567-135.14(455B).
(3)
Tier 1 assessment
report. Unless directed to do otherwise by the
department or the
owners or operators choose to prepare a Tier 2
site cleanup report, owners and
operators must assemble information about the site and the nature of the
release in accordance with the
department Tier 1 guidance, including
information gained while confirming the
release under
567-135.6 (455B),
tank closure
under
567-135.15 (455B) or completing
the initial abatement measures in 135.7(1) and 135.7(2). This information must
include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following:
a. Data on the nature and estimated quantity
of release.
b. Results of any
release investigation and confirmation actions required by subrule
135.6(3).
c. Results of the free
product investigations required under 135.7(3)"a" (6), to be
used by owners and operators to determine whether free product must be
recovered under 135.7(5).
d.
Chronology of property ownership and
underground storage tank ownership,
identification of the
person(s) having control of, or having responsibility for
the daily operation of the underground storage tanks and the operational
history of the
underground storage tank system. The operational history shall
include, but is not limited to, a description of or suspected known subsurface
or aboveground releases, past remediation or other
corrective action, type of
petroleum product stored, recent
tank and
piping tightness test results, any
underground storage tank system repairs, upgrades or replacements and the
underground storage tank and
piping leak detection method being utilized. The
operational history shall confirm that current
release detection methods and
record keeping comply with the requirements of
567-135.5 (455B), that all
release detection records have been reviewed and report any evidence that a
release detection standard has been exceeded as provided in 135.5(4) and
135.5(5).
e. Appropriate diagrams
of the site and the underground storage tank system and surrounding land use,
identifying site boundaries and existing structures and uses such as
residential properties, schools, hospitals, child care facilities and a general
description of relevant land use restrictions and known future land
use.
f. Current proof of financial
responsibility as required by
567-136.19 (455B) and
567-136.20 (455B) and the status
of coverage for
corrective action under any applicable financial assurance
mechanism or other financial assistance program.
g. A receptor survey including but not
limited to the following: existing buildings, enclosed spaces (basements, crawl
spaces, utility vaults, etc.), conduits (gravity drain lines, sanitary and
storm sewer mains and service lines), water lines and other utilities within
500 feet of the source. For conduits and enclosed spaces, there must be a
description of construction material, conduit backfill material, slope of
conduit and trenches (include flow direction of sewers), burial depth of
utilities or subsurface enclosed spaces, and the relationship to groundwater
elevations.
h. An explosive vapor
survey of enclosed spaces where there may be the potential for buildup of
explosive vapors. The groundwater professional must provide a specific
justification for not conducting an explosive vapor survey.
i. A survey of all surface water bodies
within 200 feet of the source.
j. A
survey of all active, abandoned and plugged groundwater wells within 1,000 feet
of the source with a description of construction and present or future
use.
k. Accurate and legible site
maps showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, soil borings,
field screening locations and screening values, and monitoring well and soil
boring construction logs.
l. A
tabulation of all laboratory analytical results for chemicals of concern and
copies of the laboratory analytical reports.
m. Results of hydraulic conductivity testing
and description of the procedures utilized.
n. A Tier 1 site assessment in accordance
with the department's Tier 1 guidance. The Tier 1 report shall be submitted on
forms and in a format prescribed by this guidance.
(4)
Groundwater ingestion pathway
assessment. The
groundwater ingestion pathway addresses the potential
for human ingestion of petroleum-regulated substances from existing groundwater
wells or potential drinking water wells.
a.
Pathway completeness. This
pathway is considered complete if:
(1) there is a drinking or non-drinking water
well within 1,000 feet of the source(s) exhibiting the maximum concentrations
of the chemicals of concern; or
(2)
the first encountered groundwater is a protected groundwater source.
b.
Receptor
evaluation. A drinking or non-drinking water well within 1,000 feet of
the source(s) is an actual receptor. The Tier 1 levels for actual receptors
apply to drinking water wells and the Tier 1 levels for potential receptors
apply to non-drinking water wells. Potential receptor points of exposure exist
if the first encountered groundwater is a protected groundwater source but no
actual receptors presently exist within 1,000 feet of the source.
c.
Pathway clearance. If the
pathway is incomplete, no further action is required for this pathway. If the
Tier 1 level for actual or potential receptors is not exceeded, no further
action is required for this pathway. Groundwater wells that are actual or
potential receptors may be plugged in accordance with 567-Chapter 39 and
567-Chapter 49 and may result in no further action clearance if the groundwater
is not a protected groundwater source and the pathway is thereby
incomplete.
d.
Corrective
action response. If maximum concentrations exceed the applicable Tier
1 levels for either actual or potential receptors, a Tier 2 assessment must be
conducted unless effective institutional controls are implemented as provided
below. Technological controls are not acceptable at Tier 1 for this pathway.
Abandonment and plugging of drinking and non-drinking water wells in accordance
with 567-Chapters 39 and 49 is an acceptable corrective action
response.
e.
Use of
institutional controls. To apply an effective institutional control,
if drinking or non-drinking water wells are present within 1,000 feet of the
source, and the applicable
Tier 1 level is exceeded, the well(s) for which
there is an exceedence must be properly plugged. If the groundwater is a
protected groundwater source and the maximum concentrations do not exceed the
Tier 1 level for potential receptors but do exceed the
Tier 1 level for actual
receptors, the owner or
operator must provide notification of site conditions
on a
department form to the
department water supply section, or if a county has
delegated authority, then the designated county authority responsible for
issuing private water supply construction permits or regulating non-public
water well construction as provided in 567-Chapters 38 and 49.
If the groundwater is a protected source and the maximum
concentrations exceed the Tier 1 level for potential receptors, the owner or
operator must (1) implement an institutional control prohibiting the use of the
groundwater for installation of drinking and non-drinking water wells within
1,000 feet of the source; and (2) provide notification as provided above. Ifan
effective institutional control is not feasible, a Tier 2 assessment must be
performed for this pathway in accordance with rule
567-135.10 (455B).
f.
Receptor evaluation for
public water supply wells. Rescinded IAB 3/11/09, effective
4/15/09.
(5)
Soil
leaching to groundwater pathway assessment. This
pathway addresses the
potential for soil contamination to leach to groundwater creating a risk of
human exposure through the
groundwater ingestion pathway.
a.
Pathway completeness. If
the groundwater ingestion pathway is complete, the soil leaching to groundwater
pathway is considered complete.
b.
Receptor evaluation. There is a single receptor type for this
pathway and one applicable Tier 1 level.
c.
Pathway clearance. If the
pathway is incomplete or the pathway is complete and the maximum concentrations
of chemicals of concern do not exceed the Tier 1 levels, no further action is
required for assessment of this pathway.
d.
Corrective action
response. If the Tier 1 levels are exceeded for this pathway, a Tier 2
assessment must be conducted or alternatively, institutional controls or soil
excavation may be undertaken in accordance with 135.9(7)"h."
e.
Use of institutional
controls. Institutional controls must satisfy the conditions
applicable to the groundwater ingestion pathway as provided in
135.9(4)"e."
(6)
Groundwater vapor to enclosed
space pathway assessment. This
pathway addresses the potential for
vapors from contaminated groundwater to migrate to enclosed spaces where humans
could inhale
chemicals of concern at unacceptable levels. This
pathway
assessment assumes the health-based Tier 1 levels will adequately protect
against any associated short- and long-term explosive risks.
a.
Pathway completeness.
This pathway is always considered complete for purposes of Tier 1 and must be
evaluated.
b.
Explosive
vapor survey. An explosive vapor survey must be conducted in
accordance with procedures outlined in the
department Tier 1 guidance. If
potentially explosive levels are detected, the groundwater professional must
notify the owner or
operator with instructions to report the condition in
accordance with 567-Chapter 131. The owner or
operator must begin immediate
response and abatement procedures in accordance with
567-135.7 (455B) and 567-Chapter
133.
c.
Receptor
evaluation. For purposes of Tier 1, there is one receptor type for
this pathway and the Tier 1 level applies regardless of the existence of actual
or potential receptors.
d.
Pathway clearance. No further action is required for this
pathway, if the maximum groundwater concentrations do not exceed the Tier 1
levels for this pathway.
e.
Corrective action response. If the maximum concentrations
exceed the Tier 1 levels for this pathway, a Tier 2 assessment of this pathway
must be conducted unless institutional controls are implemented. Technological
controls are not acceptable at Tier 1 for this pathway.
f.
Use of institutional
controls. An institutional control must be effective to prohibit the
placement of enclosed space receptors within 500 feet of the source.
(7)
Soil vapor to enclosed
space pathway assessment. This
pathway addresses the potential for
vapors from contaminated soils to migrate to enclosed spaces where humans could
inhale
chemicals of concern at unacceptable levels. This
pathway assessment
assumes health-based screening levels at Tier 1 will adequately protect against
short- and long-term explosive risks.
a.
Pathway completeness. This pathway is always considered
complete for purposes of Tier 1 and must be evaluated.
b.
Explosive vapor survey.
An explosive vapor survey must be conducted in accordance with procedures
outlined in the
department Tier 1 guidance. If potentially explosive levels are
detected, the groundwater professional must notify the owner or
operator with
instructions to report the condition in accordance with 567-Chapter 131. The
owner or
operator must begin immediate response and abatement procedures in
accordance with
567-135.7 (455B) and 567-Chapter
133.
c.
Receptor
evaluation. For purposes of Tier 1, there is one receptor type for
this pathway, and the Tier 1 level applies regardless of existing or potential
receptors.
d.
Pathway
clearance. No further action is required for this pathway, if the
maximum soil concentrations do not exceed the Tier 1 levels for this pathway.
If the Tier 1 levels are exceeded, soil gas measurements may be taken in
accordance with the Tier 2 guidance at the area(s) of maximum concentration.
Subject to confirmation sampling, if the soil gas measurements do not exceed
the target levels in 135.10(7)"f," no further action is
required for this pathway. If the Tier 1 level is not exceeded but the soil gas
measurement exceeds the target level, further action is required for the
pathway.
e.
Soil gas
samples. To establish that the soil gas measurement is representative
of the highest expected levels, a groundwater professional must obtain two soil
gas samples taken at least two weeks apart. One of the samples should be
collected beneath the frost line depth during a seasonal period of lowest
groundwater elevation.
f.
Corrective action response. If the maximum concentrations
exceed the Tier 1 levels and the soil gas measurements exceed target levels for
this pathway, or if no soil gas measurement was taken, a Tier 2 assessment of
this pathway must be conducted unless institutional controls are implemented or
soil excavation is conducted as provided below. Technological controls are not
acceptable at Tier 1 for this pathway.
g.
Use of institutional
controls. An institutional control must be effective to eliminate the
placement of enclosed space receptors within 500 feet of the source.
h.
Soil excavation.
Excavation of contaminated soils for the purpose of removing soils contaminated
above the Tier 1 levels is permissible as an alternative to conducting a Tier 2
assessment. Adequate field screening methods must be used to identify maximum
concentrations during excavation. At a minimum, one soil sample must be taken
for field screening every 100 square feet of the base and each sidewall. Soil
samples must be taken for laboratory analysis at least every 400 square feet of
the base and each sidewall of the excavated area to confirm that remaining
concentrations are below Tier 1 levels. If the base or a sidewall of the
excavation is less than 400 square feet, a minimum of one sample must be
analyzed for each sidewall and the base.
(8)
Groundwater to water line pathway
assessment. This
pathway addresses the potential for creating a
drinking water ingestion risk due to contact with water lines and causing
infusion to the drinking water.
a.
Pathway completeness and receptor evaluation.
(1) Actual receptors. This pathway is
considered complete for an actual receptor if there is an existing water line
within 200 feet of the source and the first encountered groundwater is less
than 20 feet below ground surface.
(2) Potential receptors. This pathway is
considered complete for a potential receptor if the first encountered
groundwater is less than 20 feet below ground surface.
b.
Pathway clearance. If the
pathway is not complete, no further action is required for this pathway. If the
pathway is complete and the maximum concentrations of all chemicals of concern
do not exceed the Tier 1 levels for this pathway, no further action is required
for this pathway.
c.
Utility company notification. The utility company which
supplies water service to the area must be notified of all actual and potential
water line impacts as soon as knowledge of a potential risk is
determined.
d.
Corrective
action response.
(1) For actual
receptors, if the Tier 1 levels are exceeded for this pathway, all water lines
within 200 feet must be replaced with water line materials and gasket materials
of appropriate construction in accordance with current department standards set
forth in 567-Chapter 43 and with no less than nitrile or FKM gaskets or as
otherwise approved by the department, or the water lines must be relocated
beyond the 200-foot distance from the source. A Tier 2 assessment must be
conducted for this pathway if lines are not replaced or relocated.
(2) For potential receptors, upon utility
company notification, no further action will be required for this
pathway.
(9)
Soil to water line pathway assessment. This
pathway addresses
the potential for creating a drinking water ingestion risk due to contact with
water lines and infusion into the drinking water.
a.
Pathway completeness and receptor
evaluation.
(1) Actual receptors.
This pathway is considered complete for an actual receptor if a water line
exists within 200 feet of the source.
(2) Potential receptors. This pathway is
always considered complete for potential receptors.
b.
Pathway clearance. If the
pathway is not complete for actual receptors, no further action is required for
this pathway. If the pathway is complete for actual receptors and the maximum
concentrations of all chemicals of concern do not exceed Tier 1 levels for this
pathway, no further action is required. For potential receptors, upon utility
company notification, no further action will be required for this pathway for
potential receptors.
c.
Utility company notification. The utility company which
supplies water service to the area must be notified of all actual and potential
water line impacts as soon as knowledge of a potential risk is
determined.
d.
Corrective
action response. For actual receptors, if the Tier 1 levels are
exceeded for this pathway, all water lines within 200 feet must be replaced
with water line materials and gasket materials of appropriate construction in
accordance with current department standards set forth in 567-Chapter 43 and
with no less than nitrile or FKM gaskets or as otherwise approved by the
department, or the water lines must be relocated beyond the 200-foot distance
from the source. Excavation of soils to below Tier 1 levels may be undertaken
in accordance with 135.9(7)"h." If none of these options is
implemented, a Tier 2 assessment must be conducted for this pathway.
(10)
Surface water pathway
assessment. This
pathway addresses the potential for contaminated
groundwater to impact surface water bodies creating risks to human health and
aquatic life.
a.
Pathway
completeness. This pathway is considered complete if a surface water
body is present within 200 feet of the source. For purposes of Tier 1, surface
water bodies include both general use segments and designated use segments as
provided in 567-subrule 61.3(1).
b.
Receptor evaluation. The Tier 1 levels for this pathway only
apply to designated use segments of surface water bodies as provided in
567-subrules 61.3(1) and 61.3(5). The point of compliance is the source with
the highest concentrations of chemicals of concern. General use segments of
surface water bodies as provided in 567-paragraph 61.3(1)"a"
are only subject to the visual inspection criteria.
c.
Visual inspection
requirements. A visual inspection of all surface water bodies within
200 feet of the source must be conducted to determine if there is evidence of a
sheen on the water or there is evidence of petroleum residue along the bank. If
a sheen or residue is evident or has been reported to be present, the
groundwater professional must make a sufficient investigation to reasonably
determine its source. If in the opinion of the groundwater professional, the
sheen is not associated with the underground storage tank site, the
professional must report and reasonably justify this opinion. If in the opinion
of the groundwater professional the sheen is not a petroleum-regulated
substance, a sample must be laboratory tested in accordance with
567-135.16(455B) to confirm it is not a petroleum-regulated
substance.
d.
Pathway
clearance. If the pathway is not complete or it is complete and the
maximum concentrations of all chemicals of concern at the point of compliance
do not exceed the Tier 1 levels and there is no petroleum sheen or residue
attributable to the site, no further action is required for assessment of this
pathway.
e.
Corrective
action response. If a Tier 1 level is exceeded for any chemical of
concern for a designated use segment within 200 feet of the source, or the
groundwater professional determines the presence of a petroleum-regulated
substance sheen or residue, a Tier 2 assessment of this pathway must be
conducted.
(11)
Tier 1 submission and review procedures.
a. Within 90 calendar days of release
confirmation or another reasonable period of time determined by the department,
owners and operators must submit to the department a Tier 1 report in a format
prescribed by the department and in accordance with these rules and the
department Tier 1 guidance.
b. If
the owner or
operator elects to prepare a Tier 2
site cleanup report instead of
a Tier 1 assessment, the
department must be notified in writing prior to the
expiration of the Tier 1 submission deadline. The Tier 2
site cleanup report
must be submitted to the
department in accordance with rule
567-135.10 (455B) within 180
calendar days of
release confirmation or another reasonable period of time
determined by the
department.
c.
Tier 1 report completeness and accuracy. A Tier 1 report is considered to be
complete if it contains all the information and data required by this rule and
the department Tier 1 guidance. The report is accurate if the information and
data is reasonably reliable based first on application of the standards in
these rules and department guidance and second, generally accepted industry
standards.
d. The
certified
groundwater professional shall include the following certification with the
Tier 1 site assessment report:
I, __________________________________________, Groundwater
Professional Certification
No. ________________, am familiar with all applicable
requirements of Iowa Code section
455B.474
and all rules and procedures adopted thereunder including, but not limited to,
567-Chapter 135 and the Department of Natural Resources Tier 1 guidance. Based
on my knowledge of those documents and information I have prepared and reviewed
regarding this site, UST Registration No. ________________, LUST No.___________
I certify that this document is complete and accurate as provided in 567 IAC
135.9(11) "c" and meets the applicable requirements of the
Tier 1 site assessment.
Signature:
Date:
e.
Upon receipt of the groundwater professional's certified Tier 1 report, the
groundwater professional's proposed site classification for the site shall be
determinative unless, within 90 days of receipt, the department identifies
material information in the report that is inaccurate or incomplete. Material
information may be data found to be inaccurate or incomplete or a report that
lacks information which, if correct and complete, would result in a different
site classification than proposed by the certified groundwater professional. If
the department determines that the site cleanup report is inaccurate or
incomplete, the department shall notify the groundwater professional of the
inaccurate or incomplete information within 90 days of receipt of the report
and shall work with the groundwater professional and the party responsible for
cleanup to obtain correct information or additional information necessary to
appropriately classify the site. If the groundwater professional recommends
proceeding to Tier 2, or a Tier 2 site cleanup report is required pursuant to
135.7(5)"g," 135.8(5), or 567-135.9 (455B), the groundwater
professional's site classification and pathway classification recommendations
shall not be considered determinative until the Tier 2 report is submitted for
review as provided in 135.10(11).
f. If a "no action required" site
classification is proposed, the department shall review the report in
accordance with 135.12(6) and the review standards in paragraph
135.9(11)"e."
(12)
Tier 1 site classification and
corrective action response.
a. No
action required site classification. At Tier 1, a site is only eligible for a
"no action required" classification. To be classified as no action required,
each pathway must meet the requirements for pathway clearance as specified in
this rule. If the department determines a no action required site
classification is appropriate, a no further action certificate will be issued
as provided in 135.12(10).
b. Where
an individual
pathway or a chemical group meets the requirements for clearance
but the site is not entitled to a no action required classification, only those
pathways and chemical groups which do not meet the no further action
requirements must be evaluated as part of a Tier 2 assessment as provided in
rule
567-135.10 (455B).
c. Compliance monitoring and confirmation
sampling. Compliance monitoring is not an acceptable corrective action at Tier
1. Except for soil gas sampling under 135.9(7), confirmation sampling to verify
a sample does not exceed a Tier 1 level is not required. However, the
department retains the authority to require confirmation sampling from existing
groundwater monitoring wells if a no action required classification is being
proposed at Tier 1 and the department has a reasonable basis to question the
representative validity of the samples based on, for example, the seasonal bias
of the sampling, evidence of multiple sources of releases, marginal groundwater
monitoring well locations and analytical variability.
d.
Expedited corrective
action. Expedited corrective action is permissible in accordance with
135.12(11).