(1) If the issuing
authority determines that a resource area is significant to an interest
identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40 for which no presumption is stated in
the Preamble to the applicable section, the issuing authority shall impose such
conditions as are necessary to contribute to the protection of such interests.
For work in the buffer zone subject to review under
310 CMR
10.02(2)(b)3., the issuing
authority shall impose conditions to protect the interests of the Act
identified for the adjacent resource area. The potential for adverse impacts to
resource areas from work in the buffer zone may increase with the extent of the
work and the proximity to the resource area. The issuing authority may consider
the characteristics of the buffer zone, such as the presence of steep slopes,
that may increase the potential for adverse impacts on resource areas.
Conditions may include limitations on the scope and location of work in the
buffer zone as necessary to avoid alteration of resource areas. The issuing
authority may require erosion and sedimentation controls during construction, a
clear limit of work, and the preservation of natural vegetation adjacent to the
resource area and/or other measures commensurate with the scope and location of
the work within the buffer zone to protect the interests of M.G.L. c. 131,
§ 40. Where a buffer zone has already been developed, the issuing
authority may consider the extent of existing development in its review of
subsequent proposed work and, where prior development is extensive, may
consider measures such as the restoration of natural vegetation adjacent to the
resource area to protect the interests of M.G.L. c. 131, § 40. The purpose
of preconstruction review of work in the buffer zone is to ensure that adjacent
resource areas are not adversely affected during or after completion of the
work.
(4)
(a)
310 CMR
10.21
through
10.37
do not change the requirement of any other Massachusetts statute or by-law. A
proposed project must comply with all applicable requirements of other federal,
state and local statutes and by-laws, in addition to meeting the requirements
of
310 CMR
10.00. Examples of such laws which may be applicable
are the Coastal Restrictions Act (M.G.L. c. 130, § 105), the Ocean
Sanctuaries Act (M.G.L. c. 132A, §§ 13 through 16 and 18), the
Mineral Resources Act (M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 54 through 58), the
Massachusetts Clean Water Act (M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53), the
Waterways laws (M.G.L. c. 91), the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act
(M.G.L. c. 30, §§ 61 through 62H), the act establishing the Martha's
Vineyard Commission (St. 1974, c. 637) and the Scenic Rivers Act (M.G.L. c. 21,
§ 2. 17B).
(b) When the site
of a proposed project is subject to a Restriction Order which has been duly
recorded under the provisions of M.G.L. c. 130, § 105, such a project
shall conform to
310 CMR
10.21
through
10.37.
(c) If an NPDES permit for any new
point-source discharge has or will be obtained prior to the commencement of the
discharge, the effluent limitations established in such permit shall be deemed
to satisfy the water quality standards established in any section of
310 CMR
10.21
through
10.37
relative to the effects of the new point-source discharge on water quality.
Such effluent limitations shall be incorporated or shall be deemed to be
incorporated into the Order of Conditions.
(6) Where any section of
310 CMR
10.00 provides that a proposed project "may be
permitted" in certain circumstances, no such project shall be undertaken until
all of the usual procedures required by M.G.L. c. 131, § 40 and
310 CMR
10.21
through
10.37
have been followed and a Final Order has been issued approving the work. The
Issuing Authority shall impose such conditions on such projects as may be
necessary to contribute to the protection of the interests of M.G.L. c. 131,
§ 40. Notwithstanding the foregoing, when the Issuing Authority determines
that a project meets the eligibility criteria for a Restoration Order of
Conditions, the Issuing Authority shall impose only the conditions set forth in
the applicable provisions of
310 CMR
10.00. As set forth in
310 CMR
10.05(6)(b)., a Restoration
Order of Conditions may reference the plans and specifications approved by the
Issuing Authority. If the Department is the Issuing Authority for a project
that is the subject of a Combined Application, the Department may attach to the
Restoration Order of Conditions any conditions that the Department has
authority to impose pursuant to
310 CMR
9.00: Waterways and
314 CMR 9.00: 401 Water
Quality Certification for Discharge of Dredged or Fill Material, Dredging, and
Dredged Material Disposal in Waters of the United States Within the
Commonwealth to the extent they are applicable.
(7) Notwithstanding the provisions of
310 CMR
10.25 through
10.35,
the Issuing Authority may issue an Order of Conditions and impose such
conditions as will contribute to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131,
§ 40, permitting the limited projects listed in 310 CMR
10.24(7)(a)
through (c), although no such project may be permitted which will have any
adverse effect on specified habitat sites of Rare Species, as identified by
procedures established under
310 CMR
10.37. In determining whether to exercise its
discretion to approve the limited projects listed in 310 CMR
10.24(7)(a)
through (c), the Issuing Authority shall consider the following factors: the
magnitude of the alteration and the significance of the project to the
interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, the availability of
reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity, and the extent to which
adverse impacts are minimized and the extent to which mitigation measures
including replication or restoration are provided to contribute to the
protection of the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40. Adverse
effects to be minimized include without limitation any adverse impacts on the
relevant interests of M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, due to changes in wave action
or sediment transport or adjacent coastal banks, coastal beaches, coastal
dunes, salt marshes or barrier beaches. The provisions of 310 CMR
10.24(7)(a)
through (c) are not intended to prohibit the Issuing Authority from imposing
such additional conditions as are necessary to contribute to the interests of
M.G.L. c. 131, § 40 where the indicated minimizing measures are not
sufficient.
(a) The construction,
reconstruction, operation and maintenance of the following structures
associated with and essential to an electric generating facility may be
permitted as a limited project pursuant to 310 CMR
10.24(7) provided the
project is proposed to be constructed and operated in accordance with all
applicable provisions of 310 CMR
10.24(1) through (6), (7)(a)1. through 6., and
(9) and (10):
1. Conduits for cooling water
intake or discharge, which may be emplaced by trenching with a minimum depth of
four feet of cover below original grade, except where they traverse salt ponds,
salt marshes and barrier beaches, in which cases they may be emplaced only by
tunneling;
2. Headwalls and other
essential structures appurtenant to 310 CMR
10.24(7)(a)1., except that these
structures may not be constructed in salt marshes, salt ponds or barrier
beaches;
3. Pipelines or other
conduits for the transmission of utilities essential to the facility (water,
fuel, sewage, and power), which may be emplaced by trenching with a minimum
depth of four feet of cover below original grade, or which may be carried above
grade on pilings or similar supports, but only if the applicant demonstrates
that there will be no adverse effect on the resource area by the construction,
operation, and maintenance of such pipelines or other conduits. If such
pipelines or conduits are emplaced through a resource area which adverse
effects are required to be minimized by
310 CMR
10.25 through
10.35,
then that standard shall be applied, except that in no case shall fuel or
sewage lines be operated or be designed to be operated so that they will have
an adverse effect on the resource area.
4. Structures necessary for navigation,
berthing and protection of such vessels and vessel movements as may be
necessary to the operation of the facility, but only on coastal banks, coastal
beaches, rocky intertidal shores or land under the ocean;
5. Structures for maritime dependent
accessory activities essential to the facility, but only on coastal banks,
coastal beaches, rock intertidal shores or land under the ocean;
6. Coastal engineering structures necessary
to the protection of such other structures as may be permitted under 310 CMR
10.24, but only on coastal banks, coastal beaches, rocky intertidal shores, or
land under the ocean;
(b) The construction, reconstruction,
operation and maintenance of underground and overhead public utilities, limited
to electrical distribution or transmission lines, or communication, sewer,
water and natural gas lines, may be permitted as a limited project pursuant to
310 CMR
10.24(7) provided that the project complies with all applicable
provisions of 310 CMR
10.24(1) through (6), (9) and (10), and (7)(b)1. through
9.:
1. For local distribution or connecting
lines not reviewed by the Energy Facilities Siting Council, the Issuing
Authority determines that alternative routes with fewer adverse effects are not
physically or legally feasible;
2.
Adverse effects during construction are minimized using the best available
measures, which may include such equipment as Bailey bridges and
helicopters;
3. The surface
vegetation and contours of the area are substantially restored;
4. When a trench is made in a Salt Marsh, all
spoil is removed from the Salt Marsh upon excavation. Clean sand or other
appropriate material shall be used to restore the level of the trench to that
of the surrounding undisturbed Salt Marsh. The surface vegetation shall be
restored substantially to its original condition by immediately transplanting
appropriate marsh plant nursery stock once construction is completed. Baffles
of concrete, clay or other non porous material shall be placed in the trench,
if necessary, to prevent groundwater excursion. During the first growing
season, periodic maintenance of the marsh restoration area shall be required
and shall include at least the replacement of non surviving transplants and the
removal of all deposits of debris and organic litter. During construction,
equipment such as Bailey bridges and helicopters shall be used to minimize,
using best available measures, the adverse effects of construction on the Salt
Marsh. All vehicles shall be used only on swamp mats or in such a way as to
prevent tire marks, trenches, or ruts;
5. No utility shall traverse a Salt Marsh
unless the applicant has shown that any thermal influence on the Salt Marsh of
such line subsequent to the project being completed will not alter the natural
freezing and thawing patterns of the top 24 inches of the Salt Marsh surface.
Thermal sand, concrete or other suitable material may be used to backfill the
trench to a point no less than 24 inches below grade. Above this level, clean
sand shall be used to restore the level of the trench to that of the
surrounding undisturbed Salt Marsh;
6. No permanent access roads shall be
permitted except in Designated Port Areas; and
7. All sewer lines shall be constructed so as
to be watertight so as to prevent inflow and leakage.
8. All fuel lines shall be double cased and
watertight so as to prevent inflow and leakage.
9. The conduits or structures shall be
designed to minimize, using the best available measures, adverse effects on the
relevant interests of M.G.L. c. 131, § 40 due to changes in wave action or
sediment transport or adjacent coastal banks, coastal beaches, coastal dunes,
salt marshes or barrier beaches.
(c) The following projects may be permitted
as a limited project pursuant to 310 CMR
10.24(7) provided the project complies
with all applicable provisions of 310 CMR
10.24(1) through (6) and (9) and
(10):
1. Maintenance and improvement of
existing public roadways, but limited to widening less than a single lane,
adding shoulders, correcting substandard intersections, and improving drainage
systems.
2. The maintenance, repair
and improvement (but not substantial enlargement except when necessary to
reduce or eliminate a tidal restriction) of structures, including buildings,
piers, towers, headwalls, bridges and culverts which existed on November 1,
1987.
3. The routine maintenance
and repair of road drainage structures including culverts and catch basins,
drainage easements, ditches, watercourses and artificial water conveyances to
insure flow capacities which existed on November 1, 1987.
4. The closure of landfills when undertaken
to comply with the requirements of 310 CMR
19.000: Solid Waste Management;
provided, however, that:
a. a project design
alternative analysis shall be prepared in accordance with
310 CMR
19.150: Landfill Assessment Requirements;
and
b. such projects shall be
designed, constructed, implemented, operated, and maintained to avoid or, where
avoidance is not practicable, to minimize impacts to resource areas, and to
meet the following standards to the maximum extent practicable:
i. hydrological changes to resource areas
shall be minimized;
ii. best
management practices shall be used to minimize adverse impacts during
construction, including prevention of erosion and siltation of adjacent water
bodies and wetlands in accordance with standard U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation
Service methods;
iii. mitigating
measures shall be implemented that contribute to the protection of the
interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40;
iv. no access road, assessment or monitoring
device, or other structure or activity shall restrict flows so as to cause an
increase in flood stage or velocity;
v. temporary structures and work areas in
resource areas, such as access roads and assessment and monitoring devices,
shall be removed within 30 days of the Department's written determination that
the closure of the facility has been completed in accordance with the closure
permit. Temporary alterations to resource areas shall be substantially restored
to preexisting hydrology and topography. At least 75% of the surface of any
area of disturbed vegetation shall be reestablished with indigenous wetland
plant species within two growing seasons and prior to said vegetative
reestablishment any exposed soil in the area of disturbed vegetation shall be
temporarily stabilized to prevent erosion in accordance with standard U.S.D.A.
Soil Conservation Service methods. Temporary structures, work areas, and
alterations to resource areas are those that no longer are necessary to fulfill
the requirements of 310 CMR
19.000: Solid Waste Management;
vi. except for direct impacts to resource
areas caused by the final cap and cover on the landfill, no changes in the
existing topography or the existing soil and surface water levels shall be
permitted, except for those resulting from temporary access roads;
vii. work in resource areas shall occur only
when the ground is sufficiently frozen, dry, or otherwise stable to support the
equipment used; and
viii. such
projects shall not include the construction of new landfills or the expansion
or modification of existing landfills.
5. Airport vegetation removal projects;
provided, however, that:
a. such projects must
be undertaken in order to comply with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Regulation Part 77 ( 14 CFR Part
77 ), FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13
(Navigational Aids and Approach Light Systems), and FAA Order 6480.4 (Air
Traffic Control Tower Siting Criteria), all as amended, or to comply with the
airport approach regulations set forth in M.G.L. c. 90, §§ 40A
through 40I;
b. such projects must
be undertaken at airports that are managed by the Massachusetts Port Authority
(Massport) or that are subject to certification by the Massachusetts
Aeronautics Commission (MAC);
c.
the requirement outlined in 310 CMR
10.24(7)(c)5.a. must be certified in
writing by the FAA or by the MAC;
d. such projects shall not include the
construction of new airport facilities or the expansion or relocation of
existing airport uses;
e. notices
of Intent filed for such projects shall:
i.
delineate the vegetation requiring removal;
ii. delineate the affected resource
areas;
iii. identify the proposed
method for removal of vegetation and analyze alternatives. At a minimum, the
alternatives analysis shall include: an alternative (based on a Federal
Aviation Administration waiver or airport operation changes) that does not
alter resource areas, which will provide baseline data for evaluating other
alternatives; an assessment of impacts to resource areas resulting from
mechanical methods of vegetation removal, including the use of both large and
small equipment; and an assessment of impacts to resource areas resulting from
chemical methods of vegetation removal;
iv. quantify the likely impacts to wildlife
habitat and water quality;
v.
evaluate possible mitigation measures, including but not limited to an
assessment of erosion and sedimentation controls, wetland restoration, wetland
replication, on-site and off-site wetland enhancement, herbicide application
guidelines, spill containment plans, development restrictions and monitoring;
and
vi. propose a five-year airport
vegetation management plan. The vegetation management plan shall, at minimum,
contain a purpose and goals statement, identify all airport protective zones,
identify proposed vegetation management areas within the protective zones, and
identify and prioritize future vegetation removal projects. Updated vegetation
management plans shall be provided for each Notice of Intent filed after the
expiration of the most recent five-year vegetation management plan
period;
f. where such
projects require the filing of a Notice of Intent in more than one
municipality, the Notice of Intent filed in each municipality shall describe
the total impacts to resource areas proposed for the entire project;
g. in addition to existing notice
requirements contained in
310 CMR
10.00, for projects pursuant to 310 CMR
10.24(7)(c)5.
copies of each Notice of Intent shall be filed simultaneously with the
Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture, the Massachusetts Historical
Commission, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management (Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern Program), and the Division of Water Supply in
the Department of Environmental Protection; and
h. such projects shall be designed,
constructed, implemented, operated, and maintained to avoid or, where avoidance
is not practicable, to minimize impacts to resource areas, and to meet the
following standards to the maximum extent practicable:
i. hydrological changes to resource areas
shall be minimized;
ii. best
management practices shall be used to minimize adverse impacts during
construction, including prevention of erosion and siltation of adjacent water
bodies and wetlands in accordance with standard U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation
Service methods;
iii. mitigating
measures shall be implemented that contribute to the protection of the
interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40;
iv. no access road or other structure or
activity shall restrict flows so as to cause an increase in flood stage or
velocity;
v. no change in the
existing surface topography or the existing soil and surface water levels shall
occur except for temporary access roads;
vi. temporary structures and work areas in
resource areas, such as access roads, shall be removed within 30 days of
completion of the work. Temporary alterations to resource areas shall be
substantially restored to preexisting hydrology and topography. At least 75% of
the surface of any area of disturbed vegetation shall be reestablished with
indigenous wetland plant species within two growing seasons and prior to said
vegetative reestablishment any exposed soil in the area of disturbed vegetation
shall be temporarily stabilized to prevent erosion in accordance with standard
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service methods;
vii. work in resource areas shall occur only
during those periods when the ground is sufficiently frozen, dry, or otherwise
stable to support the equipment being used; and
viii. slash, branches, and limbs resulting
from cutting and removal operations shall not be placed within 25 feet of the
bank of any water body.
6.
Assessment, monitoring, containment, mitigation, and remediation
of, or other response to, a release or threat of release of oil and/or
hazardous material in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR
40.0000:
Massachusetts Contingency Plan and the following general conditions (although
no such measure may be permitted which is designed in accordance with the
provisions of
310 CMR
40.1020: Background Levels of Oil and
Hazardous Material solely to reduce contamination to a level lower than that
which is needed to achieve "No Significant Risk" as defined in
310 CMR
40.0006(12) ):
a. There are no practicable alternatives to
the response action being proposed that are consistent with the provisions of
310 CMR
40.0000: Massachusetts Contingency Plan and that would be less damaging
to resource areas. The alternatives analysis shall include the following:
i. an alternative that does not alter
resource areas, which will provide baseline data for evaluating other
alternatives; and
ii. an
assessment of alternatives to both temporary and permanent impacts to resource
areas. A "Comprehensive Remedial Action Alternative" that is selected in
accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR
40.0851 through
40.0869 shall be
deemed to have met the requirements of 310 CMR
10.24(7)(c)6.a.; and
b. Such projects shall be
designed, constructed, implemented, operated, and maintained to avoid or, where
avoidance is not practicable, to minimize impacts to resource areas, and to
meet the following standards to the maximum extent practicable:
i. hydrological changes to resource areas
shall be minimized;
ii. best
management practices shall be used to minimize adverse impacts during
construction, including prevention of erosion and siltation of resource areas
in accordance with standard U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service
methods;
iii. mitigating measures
shall be implemented that contribute to the protection of the interests
identified in M.G.L. c. 131, §40;
iv. no access road, assessment or monitoring
device, or other structure or activity shall restrict flows so as to cause an
increase in flood stage or velocity;
v. temporary structures and work areas in resource areas, such as
access roads and assessment and monitoring devices, shall be removed within 30
days of completion of the work. Temporary alterations to resource areas shall
be substantially restored to preexisting hydrology and topography. At least 75%
of the surface of any area of disturbed vegetation shall be reestablished with
indigenous wetland plant species within two growing seasons and prior to said
vegetative reestablishment any exposed soil in the area of disturbed vegetation
shall be temporarily stabilized to prevent erosion in accordance with standard
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service methods. Temporary structures, work areas,
and alterations to resource areas are those that no longer are necessary to
fulfill the requirements of 310 CMR
40.0000: Massachusetts Contingency Plan;
and
vi. work in resource areas
shall occur only when the ground is sufficiently frozen, dry, or otherwise
stable to support the equipment being used.
7. The construction of a new access roadway,
or the improvement, repair and/or replacement of an existing access roadway,
needed to transport equipment to a renewable energy project site, provided that
it is carried out in accordance with the following general conditions and any
additional conditions deemed necessary by the issuing authority. Such projects
shall be designed, constructed, implemented, operated, and maintained to meet
all of the following standards to the maximum extent practicable:
a. The work is limited to the following
coastal resource areas or portions thereof: the portion of Land Subject to
Coastal Storm Flowage that is outside the Velocity Zone, Designated Port Areas,
and Banks of or Land under the Ocean, Ponds, Streams, Rivers, Lakes or Creeks
that Underlie an Anadromous/Catadromous Fish Run.
b. Hydrological changes to resource areas
shall be minimized.
c. Best
management practices shall be used to minimize adverse impacts during
construction. An applicant shall be presumed to use best management practices
to minimize adverse impacts during construction if he or she implements erosion
and sediment controls in accordance with the Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment
Control Guidelines. This presumption may be rebutted by credible evidence from
a competent source.
d. No access
road or other structure or activity shall restrict flows so as to cause an
increase in flood stage or velocity.
e. No change in the existing surface
topography or the existing soil and surface water levels shall occur except for
temporary access roads.
f.
Temporary structures and work areas in resource areas shall be removed within
30 days of completion of the work. Temporary alterations to resource areas
shall be substantially restored to preexisting hydrology and topography. At
least 75% of the surface of any area of disturbed vegetation shall be
reestablished with indigenous wetland plant species within two growing seasons
and prior to said vegetative reestablishment any exposed soil in the area of
disturbed vegetation shall be temporarily stabilized to prevent erosion.
Surface areas shall be presumed to be stabilized to prevent erosion if the
applicant implements the procedures set forth in the Massachusetts Erosion and
Sediment Control Guidelines. This presumption may be rebutted by credible
evidence from a competent source.
g. Work in resource areas shall occur only
during those periods when the ground is sufficiently frozen, dry, or otherwise
stable to support the equipment being used.
h. Slash, branches, and limbs resulting from
cutting and removal operations shall not be placed within 25 feet of the bank
of any water body.
(8)
Ecological Restoration
Limited Project.
(a)
Notwithstanding the requirements of
310 CMR
10.25 through
10.35,
10.54
through
10.58, and
10.60,
the Issuing Authority may issue an Order of Conditions permitting an Ecological
Restoration Project listed in 310 CMR
10.24(8)(e) as an Ecological Restoration
Limited Project and impose such conditions as will contribute to the interests
identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, provided that:
1. The Issuing Authority determines that the
project is an Ecological Restoration Project as defined in
310 CMR
10.04;
2. If the project will impact an area located
within estimated habitat which is indicated on the most recent Estimated
Habitat Map of State-listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife published by the Natural
Heritage and Endangered Species Program (Program), the applicant has obtained a
preliminary written determination from the Program in accordance with
310
CMR
10.11(2) that the
project will not have any adverse long-term and short-term effects on specified
habitat sites of Rare Species or the project will be carried out in accordance
with a habitat management plan that has been approved in writing by the Natural
Heritage and Endangered Species Program and submitted with the Notice of
Intent;
3. The applicant
demonstrates that the project will be carried out in accordance with any time
of year restrictions or other conditions recommended by the Division of Marine
Fisheries for coastal waters and the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife in
accordance with
310
CMR
10.11(3);
4. If the project is located in a Coastal
Dune or Barrier Beach, the applicant has demonstrated that s/he has avoided and
minimized armoring of the Coastal Dune or Barrier Beach to the maximum extent
practicable; and
5. The applicant
demonstrates that the project complies with all applicable provisions of 310
CMR
10.24(1) through (6) and (9) and (10).
(b) An Ecological Restoration Project
permitted as an Ecological Restoration Limited Project in accordance with 310
CMR
10.24(8) may result in the temporary or permanent loss of Resource Areas
and/or the conversion of one Resource Area to another when such loss is
necessary to the achievement of the project's ecological restoration
goals.
(c) As set forth in
310 CMR
10.12(3), a person
submitting a Notice of Intent for an Ecological Restoration Limited Project in
accordance with
310 CMR
10.12(1) and (2) is exempt
from the requirement to perform a wildlife habitat evaluation in accordance
with the requirements of
310 CMR
10.60, notwithstanding the provisions of
310 CMR
10.54(4)(a)5.,
10.56(4)(a)4., and 10.60.
(d) In
determining whether to approve a project as an Ecological Restoration Limited
Project, the issuing authority shall consider the following:
1. the condition of existing and historic
Resource Areas proposed for restoration including evidence of the extent and
severity of the impairment(s) that reduce the capacity of said Resource Areas
to protect and sustain the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, §
40;
2. the magnitude and
significance of the benefits of the Ecological Restoration Project in improving
the capacity of the affected Resource Areas to protect and sustain the other
interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40; and
3. the magnitude and significance of the
impacts of the Ecological Restoration Project on existing Resource Areas that
may be modified, converted and/or lost and the interests for which said
Resource Areas are presumed significant in
310 CMR
10.00, and the extent to which the applicant will:
a. avoid adverse impacts to Resource Areas
and the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, that can be avoided
without impeding the achievement of the project's ecological restoration
goals;
b. minimize adverse impacts
to Resource Areas and the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40,
that are necessary to the achievement of the project's ecological restoration
goals; and
c. utilize best
management practices such as erosion and siltation controls and proper
construction sequencing to avoid and minimize adverse construction impacts to
resource areas and the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40.
(e)
Types of Ecological Restoration Limited Projects. The
following projects may be permitted as Ecological Restoration Limited Projects
in accordance with 310 CMR
10.24(8)(a) through (d):
1.
Tidal Restoration
Project. A project that will restore tidal flow and that does not
meet all the eligibility criteria set forth in
310 CMR
10.13 may be permitted as an Ecological
Restoration Limited Project provided that in addition to the criteria set forth
in 310 CMR
10.24(8)(a) through (d), the project including any proposed flood
mitigation measures will not significantly increase flooding or storm damage
impacts to the built environment, including without limitation, buildings,
wells, septic systems, roads or other human-made structures or
infrastructure.
2.
Shellfish Habitat Restoration Project. A project to
emplace cultch or other substrate for the purpose of restoring shellfish
habitat may be permitted as an Ecological Restoration Limited Project provided
that in addition to the criteria set forth in 310 CMR
10.24(8)(a) through (d)
the following criteria are met:
a. The
applicant has received a Special Projects Permit from the Division of Marine
Fisheries or, if a municipality, has received a shellfish propagation permit;
and
b. The project is made of
cultch (e.g., shellfish shells from oyster, surf or ocean clam) or is a
structure manufactured specifically for shellfish enhancement (e.g., reef
blocks, reef balls, racks, floats, rafts, suspended gear).
3.
Other Ecological Restoration
Projects. An Ecological Restoration Project that is not listed in
310 CMR
10.24(8)(e)1. and 2. may be permitted as an Ecological Restoration
Limited Project provided the project meets the criteria set forth in 310 CMR
10.24(8)(a) through (d). Such projects include but are not limited to the
restoration, enhancement, or management of Rare Species habitat, the
restoration of hydrologic and habitat connectivity, the removal of aquatic
nuisance vegetation to impede eutrophication, the thinning or planting of
vegetation to improve habitat value, fill removal and regrading, riparian
corridor re-naturalization, river floodplain re-connection, in-stream habitat
enhancement, remediation of historic tidal wetland ditching, eel grass
restoration, invasive species management, and the installation of fish passage
structures.
(10) Any person proposing replacement of an
existing stream crossing shall demonstrate to the issuing authority that the
impacts of the crossing have been avoided where possible, and when not
possible, have been minimized and that mitigation measures have been provided
to contribute to the protection of the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131,
§ 40. An applicant will be presumed to have made this showing if the
project is designed as follows:
(a) If the
project includes replacement of an existing non-tidal crossing that is part of
an Anadromous/Catadromous Fish Run, pursuant to
310
CMR
10.35, the applicant demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the issuing authority that the crossing complies with the
Massachusetts Stream Crossing Standards to the maximum extent
practicable.
(b) If the project
includes replacement of an existing tidal crossing that restricts tidal flow,
the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the issuing authority that
tidal restriction will be eliminated to the maximum extent practicable.
This presumption may be rebutted by credible evidence from a
competent source that the impacts of the project have not been avoided,
minimized or mitigated to the maximum extent practicable.
At a minimum, in evaluating the potential to comply with the
standards to the maximum extent practicable the applicant shall consider site
constraints in meeting the standard, undesirable effects or risk in meeting the
standard, and the environmental benefit of meeting the standard compared to the
cost, by evaluating the following:
* The potential for downstream flooding;
* Upstream and downstream habitat (in-stream habitat,
wetlands);
* Potential for erosion and head-cutting;
* Stream stability;
* Habitat fragmentation caused by the crossing;
* The amount of stream mileage made accessible by the
improvements;
* Storm flow conveyance;
* Engineering design constraints specific to the
crossing;
* Hydrologic constraints specific to the crossing;
* Impacts to wetlands that would occur by improving the
crossing;
* Potential to affect property and infrastructure; and
* Cost of replacement.