(c) It is a mixture of a
waste and 1 or more
hazardous wastes that are listed in
R 299.9213 or
R 299.9214 and has not been excluded
from this subdivision pursuant to
R 299.9211 or subrule (7) or (8) of
this rule; however, mixtures of wastes and hazardous wastes that are listed in
R 299.9213 and
R 299.9214 are not hazardous wastes,
except by
application of subdivision (a) or (b) of this subrule, if the
generator can demonstrate that the mixture consists of
wastewater which, with
respect to
discharge, is subject to regulation pursuant to either section 402
or section 307(b) of the
federal clean water act, including
wastewater at
facilities that have eliminated the
discharge of
wastewater, and is 1 of the
following:
(i) One or more of the following
spent solvents that are listed in
R 299.9213, if the maximum total
weekly usage of the solvents, other than the amounts that can be demonstrated
not to be discharged to
wastewater, divided by the average weekly flow of
wastewater into the headworks of
the facility's
wastewater treatment or
pretreatment
system is not more than 1 part per million or the total measured
concentration of these solvents entering the headworks of
the facility's
astewater
treatment system, at facilities subject to regulation under parts 60,
61, or 63 of the
federal clean air act or at facilities subject to an
enforceable limit in a federal operating
permit that minizmizes
fugitive
emissions, is not more than 1 part per million on an average weekly basis:
(A) Carbon tetrachloride.
(B) Tetrachloroethylene.
(C) Trichloroethylene.
(D) Benzene.
(E) Scrubber waters derived from the
combustion of the spent solvents listed in subparagraphs (A) to (D) of this
paragraph.
Any facility that uses benzene as a solvent and claims this
exemption shall use an aerated biological wastewater treatment system and only
lined surface impoundments or tanks before secondary clarification in the
wastewater treatment system. Facilities that choose to measure concentration
levels shall file a copy of their sampling and analysis plan with the director.
A facility shall file a revised sampling and analysis plan if the initial plan
is rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility's operations. The sampling
and analysis plan shall include the monitoring point location at the headworks,
the sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents to be
monitored. A facility shall be eligible for the direct monitoring option once
it receives confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received
by the director. The director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if he
or she finds that the sampling and analysis plan does not include the required
information or the plan parameters do not enable the facility to calculate the
weekly average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the director
rejects the sampling and analysis plan or finds that the facility is not
following the sampling and analysis plan, he or she shall notify the facility
that it must cease the use of the direct monitoring option until the bases for
the rejection are corrected.
(ii) One or more of the following spent
solvents that are listed in
R 299.9213, if the maximum total
weekly usage of the solvents, other than the amounts that can be demonstrated
not to be discharged to
wastewater, divided by the average weekly flow of
wastewater into the headworks of
the facility's
wastewater treatment or
pretreatment
system is not more than 25 parts per million or the total measured
concentration of these solvents entering the headworks of
the facility's
wastewater treatment system, at facilities subject to regulation under part 60,
61, or 63 of the
federal clean air act or at facilities subject to an
enforceable limit in a federal operating
permit that minizmizes
fugitive
emissions, is not more than 25 parts per million on an average weekly basis:
(A) Methylene chloride.
(B) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane.
(C) Chlorobenzene.
(D) o-dichlorobenzene.
(E) Cresols.
(F) Cresylic acid.
(G) Nitrobenzene.
(H) Toluene.
(I) Methyl ethyl ketone.
(J) Carbon disulfide.
(K) Isobutanol.
(L) Pyridine.
(M) Spent chlorofluorocarbon
solvents.
(N)
2-ethoxyethanol.
(O) Scrubber
waters derived from the combustion of the spent solvents listed in
subparagraphs (A) to (N) of this paragraph.
Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels
shall file a copy of their sampling and analysis plan with the director. A
facility shall file a revised sampling and analysis plan if the initial plan is
rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility's operations. The sampling and
analysis plan shall include the monitoring point location at the headworks, the
sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored.
A facility shall be eligible for the direct monitoring option once they receive
confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received by the
director. The director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if he or she
finds that the sampling and analysis plan does not include the required
information or the plan parameters do not enable the facility to calculate the
weekly average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the director
rejects the sampling and analysis plan or finds that the facility is not
following the sampling and analysis plan, he or she shall notify the facility
that it must cease the use of the direct monitoring option until the bases for
the rejection are corrected.
(iii) One or more of the following wastes
that are listed in
R 299.9213 if the wastes are
discharged to the refinery oil recovery sewer before primary oil/water/solids
separation.
(A) Heat exchanger bundle
cleaning sludge from the petroleum refining industry, K050.
(B) Crude oil storage tank sediment from
petroleum refining operations, K169.
(C) Clarified slurry oil tank sediment or
in-line filter/separation solids from petroleum refining operations,
K170.
(D) Spent hydrotreating
catalyst, K171.
(E) Spent
hydrorefining catalyst, K172.
(iv) A discarded
hazardous
waste, commercial
chemical product, or
chemical intermediate
listed in
R 299.9213 or
R 299.9214, arising from de minimis
losses of the materials from manufacturing operations in which the materials
are used as raw materials or are produced in the manufacturing
process. For the
purpose of this paragraph, de minimis losses are inadvertent releases to a
wastewater treatment system, including any of the following:
(A) Losses from normal material handling
operations, such as spills from the unloading or transfer of materials from
bins or other containers or leaks from pipes, valves, or other devices that are
used to transfer materials.
(B)
Minor leaks of process equipment, storage tanks, or containers.
(C) Leaks from well-maintained pump packings
and seals.
(D) Sample
purgings.
(E) Relief device
discharges.
(F) Discharges from
safety showers and the rinsing and cleaning of personal safety
equipment.
(G) Rinsate from empty
containers or from containers that are rendered empty by that rinsing.
Any manufacturing facility that claims an exemption for de
minimis quantities of wastes listed in
R 299.9214, or any nonmanufacturing
facility that claims an exemption for deminimis quantities of wastes listed in
R 299.9213 or
R 299.9214 shall either have
eliminated the discharge of wastewaters or have included in its federal clean
water act permit application or submission to its pretreatment control
authority the constituents for which each waste was listed in accordance with
40 C.F.R. part 261, appendix VII, and the constituents identified in
40 C.F.R. §
268.40 for which each waste has a treatment
standard. A facility shall be eligible to claim the exemption once notification
of the possible deminimis releases has been provided via the clean water act
permit application or the pretreatment control authority submission. A copy of
the federal clean water act permit application or the submission to the
pretreatment control authority shall be placed in the facility's on-site
files.
(v)
Wastewater which results from laboratory operations and which contains toxic
(T) wastes listed in
R 299.9213 or
R 299.9214 if the annualized average
flow of laboratory
wastewater is not more than 1% of total
wastewater flow into
the headworks of
the facility's
wastewater treatment or pretreatment
system or
if the wastes' combined annualized average concentration is not more than 1
part per million in the headworks of
the facility's
wastewater treatment or
pretreatment
facility. Toxic (T) wastes which are used in laboratories and
which are demonstrated not to be discharged to
wastewater shall not be included
in the calculation.
(vi) Wastewater
from the production of carbamates and carbamoyl oximes, K157, if the maximum
weekly usage of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and
triethylamine, including all amounts that cannot be demonstrated to be reacted
in the process, destroyed through treatment, or recovered, divided by the
average weekly flow of process wastewater before any dilutions into the
headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment system is not more than a
total of 5 parts per million by weight or the total measured concentration of
these chemicals entering the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment
system is not more than 5 parts per million on an average weekly basis.
Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels shall file a copy of
their sampling and analysis plan with the director. A facility shall file a
revised sampling and analysis plan if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate
by changes in the facility's operations. The sampling and analysis plan shall
include the monitoring point location at the headworks, the sampling frequency
and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility shall
be eligible for the direct monitoring option once it receives confirmation that
the sampling and analysis plan has been received by the director. The director
may reject the sampling and analysis plan if he or she finds that the sampling
and analysis plan does not include the required information or the plan
parameters do not enable the facility to calculate the weekly average
concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the director rejects the
sampling and analysis plan or finds that the facility is not following the
sampling and analysis plan, he or she shall notify the facility that it must
cease the use of the direct monitoring option until the bases for the rejection
are corrected.
(vii) Wastewater
derived from the treatment of organic waste from the production of carbamates
and carbamoyl oximes, K156, if the maximum concentration of formaldehyde,
methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and triethylamine before any dilutions
into the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment system is not more
than a total of 5 milligrams per liter or the total measured concentration of
these chemicals entering the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment
system is not more than 5 milligrams per liter on an average weekly basis.
Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels shall file a copy of
their sampling and analysis plan with the director. A facility shall file a
revised sampling and analysis plan if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate
by changes in the facility's operations. The sampling and analysis plan shall
include the monitoring point location at the headworks, the sampling frequency
and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility shall
be eligible for the direct monitoring option once it receives confirmation that
the sampling and analysis plan has been received by the director. The director
may reject the sampling and analysis plan if he or she finds that the sampling
and analysis plan does not include the required information or the plan
parameters do not enable the facility to calculate the weekly average
concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the director rejects the
sampling and analysis plan or finds that the facility is not following the
sampling and analysis plan, he or she shall notify the facility that it must
cease the use of the direct monitoring option until the bases for the rejection
are corrected.
(e) It is a
used oil that contains more than
1,000 parts per million total halogens.
Used oil that contains more than 1,000
parts per million is presumed to be a
hazardous waste and is regulated as such
under
part 111 of the
act and these rules. A
person may rebut the presumption
by demonstrating that the
used oil does not contain
hazardous waste. The
demonstration may be made by showing that the
used oil does not contain
significant concentrations of halogenated hazardous constituents that are
listed in 40 C.F.R. part
261, appendix VIII. The rebuttable presumption rule
does not apply to the following materials:
(i) Metalworking oils or fluids that contain
chlorinated paraffins if the oils or fluids are processed through a tolling
agreement as specified in
40 C.F.R. §
279.24(c) to reclaim the
oils or fluids. The rebuttable presumption does apply, however, if the oils or
fluids are recycled in any other manner or are disposed of.
(ii) Used oils that are contaminated with
chlorofluorocarbons which have been removed from refrigeration units if the
chlorofluorocarbons are destined for reclamation. The rebuttable presumption
does apply, however, if the used oils are contaminated with chlorofluorocarbons
that have been mixed with used oil from sources other than refrigeration units.