N.M. Admin. Code § 17.9.568.28 - REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
A. For
each request for a pre-application report or interconnection application
received, the utility shall collect and retain the following data, at a
minimum:
(1) facility capacity;
(2) DER type (technology);
(3) number of pre-application reports
requested and processed;
(4) date
of interconnection application submittal;
(5) date interconnection application deemed
complete;
(6) date and disposition
at applicable milestones in the interconnection process, including which
screens, if any, are failed in the applicable process:
(a) initial review, (under the simplified or
fast track process);
(b)
supplemental review;
(c)
feasibility study;
(d) system
impact study;
(e) facilities
study;
(f) interconnection
agreement; and
(g) permission to
operate.
(7)
interconnection fees and study costs assessed to the customer;
(8) interconnection facility and distribution
upgrade costs assessed to the customer;
(9) number of times outside consultants were
utilized and the range of fees assessed to the customer for the consultants
services.
B. Twice
annually each utility shall submit to the commission and make available to the
public on its website an interconnection report with the following information.
The report shall contain information in the following areas, including relevant
totals for both the year.
(1) Pre-application
reports: total pre-application reports requested, completed within the time
limits (20 business days for system sizes up to one MW, and 30 business days
for system sizes greater than one MW30), and number completed outside the
specified time limits.
(2)
Interconnection applications: total number received, (noting nameplate rating
of proposed systems).
(3) Number of
interconnection applications processed within specified timeframes and
completed outside of specified time limits.
(4) Number of interconnection upgrades
completed within negotiated timelines and outside of negotiated timelines,
including a narrative on how much time it is taking to complete typical
upgrades.
(5) Number of
interconnection applications that required more than initial review: median
number of days to complete such reviews.
(6) Number of interconnection applications
withdrawn.
(7) Number of
interconnection agreements executed.
(8) A table showing the range of fees charged
for the feasibility study, system impact study, and facilities study.
(9) A table showing how many projects failed
each of the interconnection screens in the simplified, fast track and
supplemental review processes broken out by project size and type (i.e. solar,
storage, solar+storage) in the following increments: up to 25 kW, 25-100 kW,
100-500 kW, 500 kW to 2 MW, 2 to 5 MW.
(10) A narrative of how the process is
working and where there is potential for improvement by the utility or
interconnection applicants.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.