[Comment: For dates of non-regulatory government publications,
publications of recognized organizations and associations, federal rules and
federal statutory provisions referenced in this rule, see rules
3745-1-03 and
3745-1-50 of the Administrative
Code.]
[Comment: For definitions of terms used in this rule, see rules
3745-1-02 and
3745-1-50 of the Administrative
Code.]
(A) The provisions in this rule
apply in addition to the provisions in rule
3745-1-05 of the Administrative
Code.
(B) Wetland antidegradation
requirements.
(1) The wetland designated use
shall be maintained and protected such that degradation of surface waters
through direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts does not result in the net loss
of wetland acreage or functions or services in accordance with paragraphs (D),
(E), and (F) of this rule.
(2)
Wetland categorization and function.
(a) Each
wetland
shall be
is assigned a category by Ohio EPA for the purposes of
reviews of projects pursuant to this rule. Wetland categories assigned by Ohio
EPA for regulatory purposes are valid for a period of five years following
assignment by Ohio EPA unless the wetland category assignment is adopted in a
permit decision. If adopted in a permit decision, wetland categories assigned
by Ohio EPA will remain valid as long as the permit remains valid.
(i) A category will be assigned based on the
wetland's relative functions and services, sensitivity to disturbance, rarity,
and potential to be adequately compensated for by wetland mitigation.
(ii) In assigning a wetland category, the
director will consider the results of an appropriate wetland evaluation method
acceptable to the director, including but not limited to the "Ohio Rapid
Assessment Method (ORAM)" version 5.0, "Vegetation Index of Biotic Integrity
for Wetlands (VIBI)" version 1.5, and "Amphibian Index of Biotic Integrity for
Wetlands (AmphIBI)," and other information necessary in order to fully assess
the wetland's functions and services.
(iii) In assessing any reestablished
(restored), established (created), or rehabilitated (enhanced) wetland for any
purpose, the director will consider the results of VIBI or other appropriate
wetland evaluation method acceptable to the director. ORAM is not an acceptable
wetland evaluation method for reestablished (restored), established (created),
or rehabilitated (enhanced) wetlands.
(iv) Wetland antidegradation categories, and
the requirements for an antidegradation review for wetlands in each category,
are outlined in paragraphs (C) and (D) of this rule.
(b) The functions and services of a wetland
may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(i) Ground water exchange, including the
discharge and recharge of ground water.
(ii) Nutrient removal or
transformation.
(iii) Sediment or
contaminant retention.
(iv) Water
storage.
(v) Sediment
stabilization.
(vi) Shoreline
stabilization.
(vii) Maintenance of
biodiversity, as that term is defined in rule
3745-1-50 of the Administrative
Code.
(viii) Recreation.
(ix) Education and research.
(x) Habitat for threatened or endangered
species.
(3)
The director may consider the regional significance of the functions and
services a wetland performs (e.g., wetlands recognized as providing important
hydrological functions in watershed management plans) when determining whether
degradation of the wetland can be authorized.
(4) Threatened or endangered species.
(a) In making determinations regarding the
lowering of water quality in wetlands which contain critical habitat for
threatened or endangered species, or either the permanent or seasonal presence
of a threatened or endangered species, the director shall consider
considers the anticipated impact of the proposed
lowering of water quality on the threatened or endangered species.
(b) To assist the director in making this
determination, an applicant shall provide Ohio EPA written comments from both
the Ohio department of natural resources and the U.S. fish and wildlife
service, regarding threatened and endangered species, including the presence or
absence of critical habitat, for all wetlands under review, unless another
entity has been designated by the aforementioned agencies to make this
determination. In that case, the designated entity shall provide the
required
necessary written comments.
(5) Indirect impacts. In making
determinations regarding the lowering of water quality in a wetland, the
director may take into consideration other environmental impacts that may be a
consequence of approving the request.
(6) Wetlands impacted without prior
authorization.
(a) Where a wetland has been
degraded or destroyed without prior authorization, the wetland will be
considered a category 3 wetland, unless the applicant demonstrates that a lower
category is appropriate based on other information including, but not limited
to, adjacent wetland or vegetation, aerial photographs, U.S. fish and wildlife
service national wetland inventory maps, Ohio wetland inventory maps, public
information, on-site inspections, previous site descriptions, and soil
maps.
(b) The director may consider
other information in determining whether a lower category is
appropriate.
(c) When reviewing
applications for discharges to wetlands which have occurred without prior
authorization, the fact that the discharge has already occurred
shall have
has
no bearing on the decision of whether to allow lower water quality. Ohio EPA
shall review
reviews the impacts based on pre-discharge
conditions.
(d) The director may
require compensatory mitigation, if approved in accordance with other
provisions of this rule, at the same mitigation ratios as
required
indicated for impacts to category 3 wetlands, as
indicated
shown in table E-1 of this rule.
(e) Nothing in paragraph (B)(6) of this rule
relieves any person from liability for degrading or destroying a wetland
without prior authorization or in violation of any applicable laws.
(C) Wetland categories.
(1) Wetlands assigned to category 1.
(a) Wetlands assigned to category 1 support
minimal habitat, and minimal hydrological and recreational functions as
determined by an appropriate wetland evaluation methodology acceptable to the
director. Wetlands assigned to category 1 do not provide critical habitat for
threatened or endangered species or contain rare, threatened or endangered
species.
(b) Wetlands assigned to
category 1 may be typified by some or all of the following characteristics:
hydrologic isolation, low species diversity, a predominance of non-native
species (greater than fifty per cent areal cover for vegetative species), no
significant habitat or wildlife use, and limited potential to achieve
beneficial wetland functions.
(c)
Wetlands assigned to category 1 may include, but are not limited to, wetlands
that are acidic ponds created or excavated on mined lands without a connection
to other surface waters throughout the year and that have little or no
vegetation and wetlands that are hydrologically isolated and comprised of
vegetation that is dominated (greater than eighty per cent areal cover) by
Lythrum salicaria; Phalaris arundinacea; or Phragmites australis.
(2) Wetlands assigned to category
2.
(a) Wetlands assigned to category 2 support
moderate habitat, or hydrological or recreational functions as determined by an
appropriate wetland evaluation methodology acceptable to the
director.
(b) Wetlands assigned to
category 2 may include, but are not limited to: wetlands dominated by native
species but generally without the presence of, or habitat for, rare, threatened
or endangered species; and wetlands which are degraded but have a reasonable
potential for reestablishing lost wetland functions.
(3) Wetlands assigned to category 3.
(a) Wetlands assigned to category 3 support
superior habitat, or hydrological or recreational functions as determined by an
appropriate wetland evaluation methodology acceptable to the
director.
(b) Wetlands assigned to
category 3 may be typified by some or all of the following characteristics:
high levels of diversity, a high proportion of native species, or high
functional values.
(c) Wetlands
assigned to category 3 may include, but are not limited to: wetlands which
contain or provide habitat for threatened or endangered species; high quality
forested wetlands, including old growth forested wetlands, mature forested
riparian wetlands; vernal pools; and wetlands which are scarce regionally or
statewide including, but not limited to, bogs and fens.
(4) In addition to assigning a wetland a
category pursuant to this rule, the director may designate a wetland which has
national ecological or recreational significance as an outstanding national
resource water pursuant to rule
3745-1-05 of the Administrative
Code. Requests to undertake activities which will result in short-term
disturbances to water quality in wetlands which are designated as outstanding
national resource waters
shall be
are evaluated in accordance with rule
3745-1-05 of the Administrative
Code.
(D) Wetland
avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation.
(1) Alternatives analysis.
(a) Category 1 wetlands. The wetland
designated use shall be maintained and protected for wetlands assigned to
category 1 unless the applicant demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the
director, all of the following:
(i) Avoidance.
There is no practicable alternative which would have less or no adverse impact
on the wetland ecosystem.
(ii)
Minimization. Storm water and water quality controls will be installed in
accordance with paragraph (D)(2) of this rule
(iii) The impact would not result in
significant degradation to the aquatic ecosystem, as determined consistent with
40 C.F.R Part
230.10(c).
(iv)
Compensatory mitigation. The designated use is replaced by a category 2 or
category 3 wetland in accordance with table E-1 of this rule.
(b) Category 2 wetlands. The
wetland designated use shall be maintained and protected for wetlands assigned
to category 2, and no lowering of water quality shall be allowed, unless the
applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the director all of the
following:
(i) Avoidance. There is no
practicable alternative, based on technical, social and economic criteria,
which would have less or no adverse impact on the wetland ecosystem, so long as
the alternative does not have other significant adverse environmental impacts
as determined through an off-site and on-site alternatives analysis. Less
damaging upland alternatives are presumed to be available for category 2
wetlands, unless clearly demonstrated otherwise.
[Comment: Social considerations may include, but are not
limited to, public safety.]
(ii) Minimization. Appropriate and
practicable steps have been taken to minimize potential adverse impacts on the
wetland ecosystem. For category 2 wetlands, the applicant shall minimize all
potential adverse impacts foreseeably caused by the project and each
application shall include an evaluation of all of the following:
(a) The spatial requirements of the
project.
(b) The location of
existing structural or natural features that may dictate the placement or
configuration of the proposed project.
(c) The overall and basic purpose of the
project and how the purpose relates to the placement, configuration or density
of the project.
(d) The sensitivity
of the site design to the natural features of the site, including topography,
hydrology, and existing flora and fauna.
(e) Direct and indirect impacts.
(iii) The lowering of water
quality is necessary to accommodate important social or economic development in
the area in which the water body is located.
(iv) Storm water and water quality controls
will be installed in accordance with paragraph (D)(2) of this rule.
(v) Compensatory mitigation. The designated
use is replaced by a category 2 wetland, of equal or higher quality, or a
category 3 wetland in accordance with table E-1 of this rule.
(c) Category 3 wetlands. The
wetland designated use shall be maintained and protected in wetlands assigned
to category 3, and no lowering of water quality shall be allowed, unless the
applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the director all of the
following:
(i) Avoidance. There is no
practicable alternative, based on technical, social and economic criteria,
which would have less adverse impact on the wetland ecosystem, so long as the
alternative does not have other significant adverse environmental impacts as
determined through an off-site and on-site alternatives analysis. Less damaging
upland alternatives are presumed to be available for category 3 wetlands,
unless clearly demonstrated otherwise.
(ii) Minimization. Appropriate and
practicable steps have been taken to minimize potential adverse impacts on the
wetland ecosystem. For category 3 wetlands, the applicant shall minimize all
potential adverse impacts
forseeably
foreseeably caused by the project and each application
shall include an evaluation of all of the following:
(a) The spatial requirements of the
project.
(b) The location of
existing structural or natural features that may dictate the placement or
configuration of the proposed project.
(c) The overall and basic purpose of the
project and how the purpose relates to the placement, configuration or density
of the project.
(d) The sensitivity
of the site design to the natural features of the site, including topography,
hydrology, and existing flora and fauna.
(e) Direct and in-direct impacts.
(iii) The proposed activity is
necessary to meet a demonstrated public need, as defined in rule
3745-1-50 of the Administrative
Code and as determined by the director.
[Comment: Additional information on the public need
demonstration can be found on pages 6 to 7 of the ORAM manual, as cited in rule
3745-1-50 of the Administrative
Code.]
(iv) The lowering of
water quality is necessary to accommodate important social or economic
development in the area in which the water body is located.
(v) Storm water and water quality controls
will be installed in accordance with paragraph (D)(2) of this rule.
(vi) The wetland is not scarce regionally or
statewide, or if the wetland is scarce, the project will cause only a
short-term disturbance of water quality that will not cause long-term
detrimental effects.
(vii)
Compensatory mitigation. The designated use is replaced by a category 3
wetland, of equal or higher quality, in accordance with table E-1 of this
rule.
(2)
Appropriate storm water control measures shall be installed to ensure that peak
post-development rates of surface water runoff from the impacted wetland site
do not exceed the peak pre-development rates of runoff from the on-site
wetlands, for all categories of wetlands. Water quality improvement measures
shall be incorporated into the design of the storm water control measures to
the maximum extent practicable. Examples of these measures include, but are not
limited to, incorporating vegetated areas in the storm water control
plans.
(E) Compensatory
mitigation requirements.
(1) The compensatory
mitigation type and location shall be provided in the following preferred
order:
(a) At a mitigation bank, approved in
accordance with 33 C.F.R. Part
332.8, with a service area including the same
watershed as the location of the proposed wetland impacts that provides credits
for the appropriate wetland category and type.
(b) Through an in-lieu-fee program, approved
in accordance with 33 C.F.R. Part
332.8, with a service area including the same
watershed as the location of the proposed wetland impacts that provides credits
for the appropriate wetland category and type.
(c) At a permittee-responsible compensatory
mitigation site located in accordance with 33 C.F.R. Part
332.3(b).
(2) Deviations from the preferred
order established in paragraph (E)(1) of this rule require a demonstration of
all of the following:
(a) Description of the
available credits for each approved mitigation bank or in- lieu fee program
with a service area including the same watershed as the location of the
proposed wetland impacts.
(b)
Description of the costs associated with the proposed compensatory mitigation
and each preceding option outlined in paragraph (E)(1) of this rule.
(c) Discussion of how the proposed
compensatory mitigation will provide a greater ecological benefit than each
preceding option outlined in paragraph (E)(1) of this rule.
(3) Compensatory mitigation shall
be in-kind unless there is a compelling ecological reason that it should not
be. The director may consider compensatory mitigation at a forested wetland
mitigation location for impacts to a non-forested wetland site.
(4) Compensatory mitigation ratios.
Table E-1
|
Category of wetland impacted
|
Wetland type
|
Minimum mitigation ratio
|
Wetland replacement category
|
|
1
|
Non-forested
|
1.5 : 1
|
2 or 3
|
|
Forested
|
1.5 : 1
|
|
2
|
Non-forested
|
2.0 : 1
|
2 or 3
|
|
Forested
|
2.5 : 1
|
|
3
|
Non-forested
|
2.5 : 1
|
3
|
|
Forested
|
3.0 : 1
|
(5)
For category 1 or 2 wetlands created by previous coal
mining activities that are impacted as part of a remining coal operation, as
defined in paragraph (PPPPP) of rule
1501:13-1-02 of the
Administrative Code, or part of an "Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation" project,
as defined in division (C)(1) of section
1513.37 of the Revised Code, and
were not used as previous mitigation, the minimum compensatory mitigation ratio
is one to one for all wetland categories and types.
(F) Permittee-responsible compensatory
mitigation.
(1) Reestablishment (restoration)
or establishment (creation) of wetlands as the sole component of compensatory
mitigation shall be in accordance with the ratios and other provisions in
paragraph (E) of this rule.
(2) The
applicant must demonstrate that the compensatory mitigation site will be
protected long term and that appropriate management measures are, or will be,
in place to restrict harmful activities that may jeopardize the compensatory
mitigation wetland.
(3)
Compensatory mitigation shall be in the form of wetland reestablishment
(restoration) unless it can be demonstrated by the applicant that wetland
reestablishment (restoration) is impracticable. Alternative compensatory
mitigation options include wetland establishment (creation) and wetland
rehabilitation (enhancement). These and other alternative compensatory
mitigation options, including preservation of high quality wetlands and upland
buffers adjacent to wetlands assigned to category 2 or category 3 which have
been avoided in accordance with other provisions of this rule, may be
considered on a case-by-case basis.
(4) Reestablishment (restoration) or
establishment (creation) of wetlands as compensatory mitigation shall replace
the impacted wetland with an equivalent or higher quality wetland.
(5) Wetland rehabilitation (enhancement).
(a) Wetland rehabilitation (enhancement) may
be a component of acceptable compensatory mitigation. In determining the
acceptability of wetlands rehabilitation (enhancement) as compensatory
mitigation, the director shall consider
considers the extent to which the rehabilitation
(enhancement) activities will improve or repair the existing or natural
functions and services of the wetland.
(b) Wetland rehabilitation (enhancement) will
be considered most favorably as a component of compensatory mitigation when it
is located adjacent to a wetland reestablishment (restoration)
project.
(c) When wetland
rehabilitation (enhancement) is a component of acceptable compensatory
mitigation, wetlands reestablishment (restoration) or establishment (creation)
must also be a component of the compensatory mitigation and shall result in at
least one acre of reestablished (restored) or established (created) wetland for
each acre of wetland that is impacted. Wetland rehabilitation (enhancement)
must occur at a rate of at least two acres of wetland rehabilitation
(enhancement) for every remaining acre of the compensatory wetland mitigation
requirement. The wetland rehabilitation (enhancement) requirement can be
calculated using the following equation:
E = [(LMR - 1) x 2] x N
[(LMR x N) - RE] x 2, where:
E = minimum number of acres of wetlands
required to be enhanced.
LMR = left side of mitigation ratio, from the wetland
mitigation table E-1of this rule.
N = number of acres of impacted wetlands.
RE = number of acres of proposed
reestablishment (restoration) or establishment (creation) wetlands
For example, if the required mitigation ratio for compensatory
mitigation of a category 3 forested wetland is 3:1 for an impact to two acres
of wetland, an acceptable mitigation plan may include at least two acres of
reestablished (restored) or established (created) wetlands and at least eight
acres of rehabilitated (enhanced) wetlands.
(6) Wetland preservation.
(a) The director may, in exceptional
circumstances, consider wetland preservation, as defined in rule
3745-1-50 of the Administrative
Code, for compensatory mitigation if the applicant can demonstrate all of the
following:
(i) The wetland to be preserved is
a category 3 wetland which will be preserved long term, or the wetland to be
preserved is pivotal in protecting a category 3 wetland and both wetlands will
be preserved long term, or the wetland is a high quality category 2 wetland
with a reasonable potential to reestablish superior functions if preserved, as
determined by the director, including, but not limited to, mature forested
wetlands, vernal pools and wetlands important to protecting other water
resources.
(ii) The wetland to be
preserved for compensatory mitigation purposes should have important habitat or
water quality characteristics which are imminently threatened.
(iii) The wetland to be preserved for
compensatory mitigation purposes shall be deeded to a responsible party for
management or rehabilitation (enhancement) in accordance with a plan approved
by the director.
(iv) Long term
protection of the wetland to be preserved for compensatory mitigation purposes
shall include upland buffers and generally occur prior to any filling of
wetlands at the project site. At the director's discretion, it may be
acceptable for compensatory mitigation to occur concurrently with the impacts
at the project site.
(b)
When preservation is a component of acceptable compensatory mitigation,
wetlands establishment (restoration) or establishment (creation) must also be a
component of the compensatory mitigation and shall result in at least one acre
of reestablished (restored) or established (created) wetland for each acre of
wetland that is impacted to ensure no net loss of wetland acreage or function,
unless the director determines that reestablishment (restoration) or
establishment (creation) need not be a component of compensatory mitigation
based on significant ecological reasons. Wetland preservation must occur at a
rate of
at least two acres of preservation for
every remaining acre of the compensatory wetland mitigation requirement. The
wetland preservation requirement can be calculated using the following
equation:
P = [(LMR - 1) x 2] x N
[(LMR x N) - RE] x 2, where:
P = minimum number of acres of wetlands
required to be preserved.
LMR = left side of mitigation ratio, from wetland mitigation
table E-1 of this rule.
N = number of acres of impacted wetlands.
RE = number of acres of proposed
reestablishment (restoration) or establishment (creation)
wetlands.
For example, if the required mitigation ratio for compensatory
mitigation of a category 3 forested wetland is 3:1 for an impact to two acres
of wetland, an acceptable compensatory mitigation plan may include at least two
acres of reestablished (restored) wetlands and at least eight acres of
preserved wetlands.
(7) Upland buffers which are adjacent to
wetlands assigned to category 2 or category 3 and which are avoided in
accordance with the requirements of paragraph (D)(1)(b)(i) or (D)(1)(c)(i) of
this rule, may be a component of acceptable compensatory mitigation, if the
applicant can demonstrate all of the following:
(a) The average upland buffer width exceeds
the minimum of fifty feet for category 2 wetlands and one hundred feet for
category 3 wetlands.
(b) The upland
buffer and the wetland are preserved long term.
(c) The upland buffer consists of native
vegetation which is not maintained through mowing, application of herbicide or
other means which would result in deleterious effects to either the upland
buffer or the adjacent wetland.
(d)
When upland buffers are a component of acceptable compensatory mitigation,
credit shall not exceed more than 0.5 units of the required compensatory mitigation ratio, as
identified in table E-1 of this rule. For example, upland buffers could be used
to reduce the compensatory mitigation requirement for a category 2 non-forested
wetland from 2.0:1 to 1.5:1.
(8)
Performance
standards. The director may require the permittee to achieve performance
standards to demonstrate the ecological success of the mitigation project in
accordance with the "Guidelines for Wetland Mitigation Banking and In-Lieu Fee
Programs in Ohio," version 2.0 or other performance standards acceptable to the
director as determined during the review of the permit
application.
(8)(9) Compensatory
mitigation monitoring. The director
shall
require
requires the permittee to conduct
ecological monitoring of the compensatory mitigation project and submit annual
reports detailing the results of the ecological monitoring
to demonstrate progress towards compliance with the
performance standards.
(a) The
ecological monitoring may include, but is not limited to, collection of data on
hydrologic characteristics, vegetation communities and soils at the
compensatory mitigation site and conducting an assessment of the compensatory
mitigation wetlands using an appropriate wetland evaluation method in
accordance with paragraph (B)(2)(a)(iii) of this rule.
(b) Ecological monitoring shall be conducted
for a period of at least five years for non-forested wetlands and at least ten
years for forested wetlands following construction of the compensatory
mitigation.
(i) Upon written request, the
director may waive ecological monitoring requirements for the full five or ten
years if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the director that the
compensatory mitigation wetland is meeting required
goals or targets
the performance
standards.
(ii) Upon written
request, the director may grant a maximum two year extension from the end of
the five year or ten year monitoring period to complete outstanding
compensatory mitigation obligations. Submittal of annual reports shall continue
during the extension.
(iii) At the
end of five years or ten years, or seven years or twelve years if an extension
is approved, compensatory mitigation that does not meet
required goals or targets shall
performance standards will be rectified through the
purchase of mitigation credits at a wetland mitigation bank or through an
in-lieu-fee program, when available, in accordance with paragraph (E) of this
rule.
When mitigation credits are not available, permittees may
propose alternate compensatory mitigation to fulfill the permit requirements
for the director to consider. The director may consider reductions in the
required compensatory mitigation based upon
the ecological status of the original compensatory mitigation project.
(G) The following thirty-seven groupings of
cataloging units from the hydrologic unit map of Ohio, U.S. geological survey,
1988,
shall be
are the watersheds for the purposes of location of
compensatory mitigation : (04100001, 04100002, and 04100009 - combined);
(0410003, 04100005 - combined); 04100004; 04100006; 04100007; 04100008;
04100010; 04100011; 04100012; 04110001; 04110002; (04110003 (minus the Chagrin
river watershed) and 04110101 - combined); 04110003 (Chagrin river watershed
only); 04110004; 05030101; 05030102; 05030103; 05030106; 05030201; 05030202;
05030204; 05040001; 05040002; 05040003; 05040004; 05040005; 05040006; 05060001;
05060002; 05060003; 05080001; (05080002, 05080003, and 05090203 - combined);
05090101; 05090103; 05090201; 05090202; and (05120101 and 05120103 - combined).
This information is also depicted in appendix 1 to this rule.
Click to view
Appendix
Notes
Ohio Admin. Code
3745-1-54
Effective:
10/10/2024
Five Year Review (FYR) Dates:
4/1/2024 and
10/10/2029
Promulgated
Under: 119.03
Statutory
Authority: 6111.041,
6111.12,
6111.30
Rule
Amplifies: 6111.041,
6111.12,
6111.30
Prior
Effective Dates: 05/01/1998, 10/17/2003,
07/30/2018