(a) The waste
exhibits any of the characteristics of hazardous waste identified in rules
3745-51-20 to
3745-51-24 of the Administrative
Code. However, any mixture of a waste from the extraction, beneficiation, and
processing of ores and minerals excluded under paragraph (B)(7) of rule
3745-51-04 of the Administrative
Code and any other waste exhibiting a characteristic of hazardous waste under
rules
3745-51-20 to
3745-51-24 of the Administrative
Code is a hazardous waste only if such mixture exhibits a characteristic that
would not have been exhibited by the excluded waste alone if such mixture had
not occurred, or if such mixture continues to exhibit any of the
characteristics exhibited by the non-excluded wastes prior to mixture. Further,
for the purposes of applying the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure to
such mixtures, the mixture is also a hazardous waste if such mixture exceeds
the maximum concentration for any contaminant listed in the table in rule
3745-51-24 of the Administrative
Code that would not have been exceeded by the excluded waste alone if the
mixture had not occurred or if such mixture continues to exceed the maximum
concentration for any contaminant exceeded by the nonexempt waste prior to
mixture.
(c)(d) The waste is a
mixture of waste and one or more hazardous wastes listed in rules
3745-51-30 to
3745-51-35 of the Administrative
Code and has not been excluded from paragraph (A)(2) of this rule under
40 CFR
260.20 and
40 CFR
260.22, paragraph (G) of this rule, or
paragraph (H) of this rule. However, the following mixtures of wastes and
hazardous wastes listed in rules
3745-51-30 to
3745-51-35 of the Administrative
Code are not hazardous wastes [except by application of paragraph (A)(2)(a) or
(A)(2)(b) of this rule] if the generator can demonstrate that the mixture
consists of wastewater, the discharge of which is subject to regulation under
either Section 402 or Section 307(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (including
wastewater at facilities which have eliminated the discharge of wastewater)
and:
(i) One or more of the following spent
solvents listed in rule
3745-51-31 of the Administrative
Code -
benzene, carbon tetrachloride,
tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene or the scrubber
water
waters
derived-from the combustion of these spent solvents-provided that the maximum
total weekly usage of these solvents (other than the amounts that can be
demonstrated not to be discharged to wastewater) divided by the average weekly
flow of wastewater into the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment or
pretreatment system does not exceed one part per million; or the total measured
concentration of these solvents entering the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system (at facilities subject to regulation under the
Clean Air Act (CAA) at 40 CFR Part
60, 40 CFR Part
61, or 40 CFR Part
63, or at
facilities subject to an enforceable limit in a federal operating permit that
minimizes fugitive emissions), does not exceed one part per million on an
average weekly basis. Any facility that uses benzene as a solvent and claims
this exemption shall use an aerated biological wastewater treatment system and
shall use only lined surface impoundments or tanks prior to secondary
clarification in the wastewater treatment system. Facilities that choose to
measure concentration levels shall file a copy of the facility's sampling and
analysis plan with the regional administrator, or the director, as the context
requires. A facility shall file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis plan
only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility's
operations. The sampling and analysis plan shall include the monitoring point
location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of
constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the direct monitoring
option once the facility receives confirmation that the sampling and analysis
plan has been received by the director. The director may reject the sampling
and analysis plan if the director finds that the sampling and analysis plan
fails to include the information required in this paragraph, or if the plan
parameters would not enable the facility to accurately calculate the weekly
average concentration of these chemicals. If the director rejects the sampling
and analysis plan, or if the director finds that the facility is not following
the sampling and analysis plan, the director shall notify the facility to cease
the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as the bases for
rejection are corrected; or
(ii)
One or more of the following spent solvents listed in rule
3745-51-31 of the Administrative
Code - methylene chloride, 1, 1, 1-trichloroethane, chlorobenzene,
o-dichlorobenzene, cresols, cresylic acid, nitrobenzene, toluene, methyl ethyl
ketone, carbon disulfide, isobutanol, pyridine, spent chlorofluorocarbon
solvents, 2-ethoxyethanol, or the scrubber waters derived-from the combustion
of these spent solvents - provided that the maximum total weekly usage of these
solvents (other than the amounts that can be demonstrated not to be discharged
to wastewater) divided by the average weekly flow of wastewater into the
headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment or pretreatment system does
not exceed twenty-five parts per million, or the total measured concentration
of these solvents entering the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment
system (at facilities subject to regulation under the CAA at
40 CFR Part 60, 40
CFR Part
61, or 40 CFR Part
63, or at facilities subject to an enforceable
limit in a federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions), does
not exceed twenty-five parts per million on an average weekly basis. Facilities
that choose to measure concentration levels shall file a copy of the facility's
sampling and analysis plan with the regional administrator, or the director, as
the context requires. A facility shall file a copy of a revised sampling and
analysis plan only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the
facility's operations. The sampling and analysis plan shall include the
monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology,
and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the
direct monitoring option once the facility receives confirmation that the
sampling and analysis plan has been received by the director. The director may
reject the sampling and analysis plan if the director finds that the sampling
and analysis plan fails to include the information required in this paragraph,
or if the plan parameters would not enable the facility to accurately calculate
the weekly average concentration of these chemicals. If the director rejects
the sampling and analysis plan, or if the director finds that the facility is
not following the sampling and analysis plan, the director shall notify the
facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as
the bases for rejection are corrected; or
(iii) One of the following wastes listed in
rule
3745-51-32 of the Administrative
Code, provided that the wastes are discharged to the refinery oil recovery
sewer before primary oil or water or solids separation - heat exchanger bundle
cleaning sludge from the petroleum refining industry (EPA hazardous waste
number K050), crude oil storage tank sediment from petroleum refining
operations (EPA hazardous waste number K169), clarified slurry oil tank
sediment or in-line filter solids or separation solids from petroleum refining
operations (EPA hazardous waste number K170), spent hydrotreating catalyst (EPA
hazardous waste number K171), and spent hydrorefining catalyst (EPA hazardous
waste number K172); or
(iv) A
discarded hazardous waste, commercial chemical product, or chemical
intermediate listed in rules
3745-51-31 to
3745-51-33 of the Administrative
Code, arising from de minimis losses of these materials. For purposes of this
paragraph, "de minimis losses" are inadvertent releases to a wastewater
treatment system, including those from normal material handling operations
(e.g., spills from the unloading or transfer of materials from bins or other
containers, leaks from pipes, valves, or other devices used to transfer
materials); minor leaks of process equipment, storage tanks, or containers;
leaks from well-maintained pump packings and seals; sample purgings; relief
device discharges; discharges from safety showers and rinsing and cleaning of
personal safety equipment; and rinsate from empty containers or from containers
that are rendered empty by that rinsing. Any manufacturing facility that claims
an exemption for de minimis quantities of wastes listed in rules
3745-51-31 to
3745-51-32 of the Administrative
Code, or any non-manufacturing facility that claims an exemption for de minimis
quantities of wastes listed in rules
3745-51-30 to
3745-51-35 of the Administrative
Code, either shall have eliminated the discharge of wastewaters or shall have
included in the facility's CWA permit application or submittal to the
facility's pretreatment control authority the constituents for which each waste
was listed (in the appendix to rule
3745-51-30 of the Administrative
Code); and the constituents in the table "Treatment Standards for Hazardous
Wastes" in rule
3745-270-40 of the
Administrative Code for which each waste has a treatment standard (i.e., land
disposal restriction constituents). A facility is eligible to claim the
exemption once the permit writer or control authority has been notified of
possible de minimis releases via the CWA permit application or the pretreatment
control authority submittal. A copy of the CWA permit application or the
submittal to the pretreatment control authority shall be placed in the
facility's
on-site files; or
(v) Wastewater resulting from laboratory
operations containing toxic (T) wastes listed in rules
3745-51-30 to
3745-51-35 of the Administrative
Code, provided that the annualized average flow of laboratory wastewater does
not exceed one per cent of total wastewater flow into the headworks of the
facility's wastewater treatment or pretreatment system, or provided the wastes'
combined annualized average concentration does not exceed one part per million
in the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment or pretreatment
facility. Toxic (T) wastes used in laboratories that are demonstrated not to be
discharged to wastewater are not to be included in this calculation;
or
(vi) One or more of the
following wastes listed in rule
3745-51-32 of the Administrative
Code - wastewaters from the production of carbamates and carbamoyl oximes (EPA
hazardous waste number K157) - provided that the maximum weekly usage of
formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and triethylamine (including
all amounts that cannot be demonstrated to be reacted in the process, destroyed
through treatment, or
is recovered, i.e., what is
discharged or volatilized) divided by the average weekly flow of process
wastewater prior to any dilutions into the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system does not exceed a total of five parts per million
by weight; or the total measured concentration of these chemicals entering the
headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment system (at facilities subject
to regulation under the CAA at 40 CFR Part
60, 40 CFR Part
61, or 40 CFR Part
63, or at facilities subject to an enforceable limit in a federal operating
permit that minimizes fugitive emissions), does not exceed five parts per
million on an average weekly basis. Facilities that choose to measure
concentration levels shall file a copy of the facility's sampling and analysis
plan with the regional administrator, or the director, as the context requires.
A facility shall file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis plan only if
the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility's
operations. The sampling and analysis plan shall include the monitoring point
location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of
constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the direct monitoring
option once the facility receives confirmation that the sampling and analysis
plan has been received by the director. The director may reject the sampling
and analysis plan if the director finds that the sampling and analysis plan
fails to include the information required in this paragraph, or if the plan
parameters would not enable the facility to accurately calculate the weekly
average concentration of these chemicals. If the director rejects the sampling
and analysis plan, or if the director finds that the facility is not following
the sampling and analysis plan, the director shall notify the facility to cease
the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as the bases for
rejection are corrected; or
(vii)
Wastewaters derived-from the treatment of one or more of the following wastes
listed in rule
3745-51-32 of the Administrative
Code- organic waste (including heavy ends, still bottoms, light ends, spent
solvents, filtrates, and decantates) from the production of carbamates and
carbamoyl oximes (EPA hazardous waste number K156) - provided that the maximum
concentration of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and
triethylamine prior to any dilutions into the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system does not exceed a total of five milligrams per
liter or the total measured concentration of these chemicals entering the
headworks of the
facility's
facility's
wastewater treatment system (at facilities subject to regulation under the CAA
at 40 CFR Part
60, 40 CFR Part
61, or 40 CFR Part
63, or at facilities subject
to an enforceable limit in a federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive
emissions), does not exceed five milligrams per liter on an average weekly
basis. Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels shall file a copy
of the facility's sampling and analysis plan with the regional administrator,
or the director, as the context requires. A facility shall file a copy of a
revised sampling and analysis plan only if the initial plan is rendered
inaccurate by changes in the facility's operations. The sampling and analysis
plan shall include the monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling
frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored. A
facility is eligible for the direct monitoring option once the facility
receives confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received by
the director. The director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if the
director finds that the sampling and analysis plan fails to include the
information required in this paragraph, or if the plan parameters would not
enable the facility to accurately calculate the weekly average concentration of
these chemicals. If the director rejects the sampling and analysis plan, or if
the director finds that the facility is not following the sampling and analysis
plan, the director shall notify the facility to cease the use of the direct
monitoring option until such time as the bases for rejection are
corrected.
(d)(e) Rebuttable
presumption for used oil. Used oil containing more than one thousand parts per
million total halogens is presumed to be a hazardous waste because the used oil
has been mixed with halogenated hazardous waste listed in rules
3745-51-30 to
3745-51-35 of the Administrative
Code. Persons may rebut this presumption by demonstrating that the used oil
does not contain hazardous waste (for example, to show that the used oil does
not contain significant concentrations of halogenated hazardous constituents
listed in the appendix to rule
3745-51-11 of the Administrative
Code).
(i) The rebuttable presumption does not
apply to metalworking oils or fluids containing chlorinated paraffins, if they
are processed, through a tolling agreement, to reclaim metalworking oils or
fluids. The presumption does apply to metalworking oils or fluids if such oils
or fluids are recycled in any other manner, or disposed.
(ii) The rebuttable presumption does not
apply to used oils contaminated with chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) removed from
refrigeration units where the CFCs are destined for reclamation. The rebuttable
presumption does apply to used oils contaminated with CFCs that have been mixed
with used oil from sources other than refrigeration units.