Or. Admin. R. 340-252-0060 - Consultation
(1) General:
(a) This section provides procedures for
interagency consultation (Federal, State, and local) and resolution of
conflicts. Consultation shall be undertaken by MPOs, the Oregon Department of
Transportation, affected local jurisdictions, and United States Department of
Transportation before making conformity determinations and in developing
regional transportation plans and transportation improvement programs.
Consultation shall be undertaken by a lead planning agency, the Department of
Environmental Quality, the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency (for actions in
Lane County which are subject to this division), or any other regional air
authority, and United States Environmental Protection Agency in developing
applicable implementation plans.
(b) The lead planning agency, the Department
of Environmental Quality, the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency for Lane
County, or any other regional air authority, shall be the lead agency
responsible for preparing the final document or decision and for assuring the
adequacy of the interagency consultation process with respect to the
development, amendment or revision (except administrative amendments or
revisions) of an applicable implementation plan including, the motor vehicle
emissions budget. The MPO, Oregon Department of Transportation, or any other
party responsible for making conformity determinations pursuant to this rule,
shall be the lead agency responsible for preparing the final document or
decision and for assuring the adequacy of the interagency consultation process
with respect to the development of the transportation plan, the TIP, and any
determinations of conformity under this rule. The project sponsor shall be
responsible for assuring the conformity of FHWA/FTA projects and regionally
significant projects approved or adopted by a recipient of funds under title
23.
(c) In addition to the lead
agencies identified in subsection (b), other agencies entitled to participate
in any interagency consultation process under OAR
340-252-0060 include
the Oregon Department of Transportation, both headquarters and each affected
regional or district office, each affected MPO, the Federal Highway
Administration regional office in Portland and State division office in Salem,
the Federal Transit Administration regional office, the Department of
Environmental Quality, both headquarters and each affected regional office, any
affected regional air authority, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency, both headquarters and each affected regional or district office, and
any other organization within the State responsible under State law for
developing, submitting or implementing transportation-related provisions of an
implementation plan, any local transit agency, and any city or county
transportation or air quality agency.
(d) Specific roles and responsibilities of
various participants in the interagency consultation process shall be as
follows:
(A) The lead planning agency, the
Department of Environmental Quality, the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency,
or any other regional air authority, shall be responsible for developing:
(i) Emissions inventories;
(ii) Emissions budgets;
(iii) Attainment and maintenance
demonstrations;
(iv) Control
strategy implementation plan revisions; and
(v) Updated motor vehicle emissions factors.
(B) Unless otherwise
agreed to in a Memorandum of Understanding between the affected jurisdictions
and the Department of Environmental Quality, the Department of Environmental
Quality shall be responsible for developing the transportation control measures
to be included in SIPs in nonattainment or maintenance areas, except Lane
County.
(C) The Lane Regional Air
Protection Agency shall be responsible for developing transportation control
measures for PM10 in Lane County.
(D) The MPO shall be responsible for:
(i) Developing transportation plans and TIPs,
and making corresponding conformity determinations;
(ii) Making conformity determinations for the
entire nonattainment or maintenance area including areas beyond the boundaries
of the MPO where no agreement is in effect as required by 23 CFR
¦450.310(f);
(iii) Monitoring regionally significant
projects;
(iv) Developing and
evaluating TCMs in nonattainment and/or maintenance areas;
(v) Providing technical and policy input on
emissions budgets;
(vi) Performing
transportation modeling, regional emissions analyses and documenting timely
implementation of TCMs as required for determining conformity;
(vii) Distributing draft and final project
environmental documents which have been prepared by the MPO to other
agencies.
(E) The Oregon
Department of Transportation shall be responsible for:
(i) Providing technical input on proposed
revisions to motor vehicle emissions factors;
(ii) Distributing draft and final project
environmental documents prepared by ODOT to other agencies;
(iii) Convening air quality technical review
meetings on specific projects when requested by other agencies or, as
needed;
(iv) Convening interagency
consultation meetings required for purposes of making conformity determinations
in non-metropolitan nonattainment or maintenance areas;
(v) Making conformity determinations in
non-metropolitan nonattainment or maintenance area.
(F) The project sponsor shall be responsible
for;
(i) Assuring project level conformity
including, where required by this rule, localized air quality
analysis;
(ii) Distributing draft
and final project environmental documents prepared by the project sponsor to
other agencies.
(G) The
Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration shall be
responsible for assuring timely action on final findings of conformity, after
consultation with other agencies as provided in this section and 40 CFR
§ 93.105.
(H) United State Environmental Protection
Agency shall be responsible for:
(i)
Reviewing and approving updated motor vehicle emissions factors; and
(ii) Providing guidance on conformity
criteria and procedures to agencies in interagency
consultation.
(I) Any
agency, by mutual agreement with another agency, may take on a role or
responsibility assigned to that other agency under this rule.
(J) In metropolitan areas, any state or local
transportation agency, or transit agency shall disclose regionally significant
projects to the MPO standing committee established under OAR
340-252-0060(2)(b)
in a timely manner.
(i) Such disclosure shall be made not later
than the first occasion on which any of the following actions is sought:
adoption or amendment of a local jurisdiction's transportation system plan to
include a proposed project, the issuance of administrative permits for the
facility or for construction of the facility, the execution of a contract for
final design or construction of the facility, the execution of any indebtedness
for the facility, any final action of a board, commission or administrator
authorizing or directing employees to proceed with final design, permitting or
construction of the project, or any approval needed for any facility that is
dependent on the completion of the regionally significant project.
(ii) To help assure timely disclosure, the
sponsor of any potentially regionally significant project shall disclose to the
MPO annually on or before July 1.
(iii) In the case of any regionally
significant project that has not been disclosed to the MPO and other interested
agencies participating in the consultation process in a timely manner, such
regionally significant project shall be deemed not to be included in the
regional emissions analysis supporting the currently conforming TIP's
conformity determination and not to be consistent with the motor vehicle
emissions budget in the applicable implementation plan, for the purposes of 40
CFR ¦93.121.
(K)
In non-metropolitan areas, any state or local transportation agency, or transit
agency shall disclose regionally significant projects to Oregon Department of
Transportation in a timely manner.
(i) Such
disclosure shall be made no later than the first occasion on which any of the
following actions is sought: adoption or amendment of a local jurisdiction's
transportation system plan to include a proposed project, the issuance of
administrative permits for the facility or for construction of the facility,
the execution of a contract for final design or construction of the facility,
the execution of any indebtedness for the facility, any final action of a
board, commission or administrator authorizing or directing employees to
proceed with final design, permitting or construction of the project, or any
approval needed for any facility that is dependent on the completion of the
regionally significant project.
(ii) To help assure timely disclosure, the
sponsor of any potentially regionally significant project shall disclose to
Oregon Department of Transportation as requested. Requests for disclosure shall
be made in writing to any affected state or local transportation or transit
agency.
(2) Interagency consultation: specific
processes.
(a) State Implementation Plan
development.
(A) It shall be the affirmative
responsibility of the Department of Environmental Quality, the Lane Regional
Air Protection Agency, or any other regional air authority with the
responsibility for preparing or revising a State Implementation Plan, except
for administrative amendments or revisions, to initiate the consultation
process by notifying other participants and convening a working group made up
of representatives of each affected agency in the consultation process
including representatives of the public, as appropriate. Such working group
shall be chaired by a representative of the convening agency, unless the group
by consensus selects another chair. The working group shall make decisions by
majority vote. Such working group shall begin consultation meetings early in
the process of decision on the final SIP, and shall review drafts of the final
SIP, the emissions budget, and major supporting documents, or appoint the
representatives or agencies that will review such drafts. Such working group
shall be made up of policy level officials, and shall be assisted by such
technical committees or technical engineering, planning, public works, air
quality, and administrative staff from the member agencies as the working group
deems appropriate. The chair, or his/her designee, shall set the agenda for
meetings and assure that all relevant documents and information are supplied to
all participants in the consultation process in a timely manner.
(B) Regular consultation on development or
amendment of an implementation plan shall include meetings of the working group
at regularly scheduled intervals, no less frequently than quarterly. In
addition, technical meetings shall be convened as necessary.
(C) Each lead agency with the responsibility
for preparing the SIP subject to the interagency consultation process, shall
confer through the working group process with all other agencies identified
under subsection (1)(c) of this rule with an interest in the document to be
developed, provide all appropriate information to those agencies needed for
meaningful input, and, consider the views of each such agency and respond to
substantive comments in a timely, substantive written manner prior to making a
recommendation to the Environmental Quality Commission for a final decision on
such document. Such views and written response shall be made part of the record
of any decision or action.
(D) The
working group may appoint subcommittees to address specific issues pertaining
to SIP development. Any recommendations of a subcommittee shall be considered
by the working group.
(E) Meetings
of the working group shall be open to the public. The agency with the
responsibility of preparing the SIP shall provide timely written notification
of working group meetings to those members of the public who have requested
such notification. In addition, reasonable efforts shall be made to identify
and provide timely written notification to interested parties.
(b) Metropolitan Areas. There
shall be a standing committee for purposes of consultation required under this
rule by an MPO. The standing committee shall advise the MPO. The committee
shall include representatives from state and regional air quality planning
agencies and State and local transportation and transit agencies. The standing
committee shall consult with the United States Environmental Protection Agency
and the United States Department of Transportation. If not designated by
committee bylaws, the standing committee shall select its chair by majority
vote.
(A) For MPOs designated prior to the
effective date of this rule, the following standing committees are designated
for purposes of interagency consultation required by this rule:
(i) Lane Council of Governments:
Transportation Planning Committee;
(ii) Salem-Keizer Area Transportation Study:
Technical Advisory Committee;
(iii)
Metro: Transportation Policy Alternatives Committee;
(iv) Rogue Valley Council of Governments:
Technical Advisory Committee.
(B) Any MPO designated an air quality
nonattainment or maintenance area subsequent to the effective date of this rule
shall establish a standing committee to meet the requirements of this rule.
(C) The standing committee shall
hold meetings at least quarterly. The standing committee shall make decisions
by majority vote.
(D) The standing
committee shall be responsible for consultation on:
(i) Determining which minor arterials and
other transportation projects should be considered "regionally significant" for
the purposes of regional emissions analysis, in addition to those functionally
classified as principal arterial or higher or fixed guideway systems or
extensions that offer an alternative to regional highway travel;
(ii) Determining whether a project's design
concept and scope have changed significantly since the plan and TIP conformity
determination;
(iii) Evaluating
whether projects otherwise exempted from meeting the requirements of this rule
should be treated as non-exempt in cases where potential adverse emissions
impacts may exist for any reason;
(iv) Making a determination, as required by
40 CFR § 93.113 whether past obstacles to implementation of TCMs which are
behind the schedule established in the applicable implementation plan have been
identified and are being overcome, and whether State and local agencies with
influence over approvals or funding for TCMs are giving maximum priority to
approval or funding for TCMs; this consultation process shall also consider
whether delays in TCM implementation necessitate revisions to the applicable
implementation plan to remove TCMs or substitute TCMs or other emission
reduction measures;
(v)
Identifying, as required by 40 CFR § 93.123, projects located at sites in
PM10 or PM2.5nonattainment or maintenance areas which have vehicle and roadway
emission and dispersion characteristics which are essentially identical to
those at sites which have violations verified by monitoring, and therefore
require quantitative PM10 or PM2.5 hot-spot analysis;
(vi) Forecasting vehicle miles traveled, and
any amendments thereto;
(vii)
Making a determination, as required by 40 CFR § 93.121, whether the
project is included in the regional emissions analysis supporting the currently
conforming TIP's conformity determination, even if the project is not strictly
"included" in the TIP for the purposes of MPO project selection or endorsement,
and whether the project's design concept and scope have not changed
significantly from those which were included in the regional emissions
analysis, or in a manner which would significantly impact use of the
facility;
(viii) Determining
whether the project sponsor or MPO has demonstrated that the requirements of 40
CFR § 93.116, 40 CFR § 93.118, and 40 CFR § 93.119 are satisfied
without a particular mitigation or control measure, as provided in 40 CFR
§93.125;
(ix) Evaluating
events which will trigger new conformity determinations in addition to those
triggering events established in 40 CFR § 93.104;
(x) Consulting on emissions analysis for
transportation activities which cross the borders of MPOs or nonattainment or
maintenance areas or air basins;
(xi) Assuring that plans for construction of
regionally significant projects which are not FHWA/FTA projects, including
projects for which alternative locations, design concept and scope, or the
no-build option are still being considered, are disclosed to the MPO on a
regular basis, and assuring that any changes to those plans are immediately
disclosed;
(xii) The design,
schedule, and funding of research and data collection efforts and regional
transportation model development by the MPO (e.g., household/travel
transportation surveys);
(xiii)
Development of transportation improvement programs;
(xiv) Development of regional transportation
plans;
(xv) Establishing
appropriate public participation opportunities for project-level conformity
determinations required by this division, in the manner specified by 23
CFR Part 450; and
(xvi)
Notification of transportation plan or TIP revisions or amendments which merely
add or delete exempt projects listed in 40 CFR ¦ 93.126 and 40 CFR
§ 93.127.
(E) The
chair of each standing committee, or his/her designee, shall set the agenda for
all meetings. The chair of each standing committee shall assure that all
agendas, and relevant documents and information are supplied to all
participants in the consultation process in a timely manner prior to standing
committee meetings which address any issues described in paragraph (2)(b)(D) of
this rule.
(F) Such standing
committees shall begin consultation meetings early in the process of decision
on the final document, and shall review all drafts of the final document and
major supporting documents. The standing committee shall consult with EPA and
USDOT.
(G) The MPO shall confer
with the standing committee and shall consult with all other agencies
identified under subsection (1)(c) of this rule with an interest in the
document to be developed, shall provide all appropriate information to those
agencies needed for meaningful input, and consider the views of each such
agency. The MPO shall provide draft conformity determinations to standing
committee members and shall allow a minimum of 30 days for standing committee
members to comment. The 30 day comment period for standing committee members
may occur concurrently with the public comment period. The MPO shall respond to
substantive comments raised by a standing committee member in a timely,
substantive written manner at least 7 days prior to any final decision by the
MPO on such document. Such views and written response shall be made part of the
record of any decision or action.
(H) The standing committee may, where
appropriate, appoint a subcommittee to develop recommendations for
consideration by the full committee.
(I) Meetings of the standing committee shall
be open to the public. The MPO shall provide timely written notification of
standing committee meetings to those members of the public who have requested
such notification. In addition, reasonable efforts shall be made to identify
and provide timely written notification to interested
parties.
(c) An MPO, or
any other party responsible for developing Transportation Control Measures,
shall consult with affected parties listed in subsection (1)(c) in developing
TCMs for inclusion in an applicable implementation plan.
(d) Non-metropolitan areas.
(A) In non-metropolitan areas the following
interagency consultation procedures shall apply, unless otherwise agreed to by
the affected parties in a Memorandum of Understanding, or specified in an
applicable implementation plan:
(B)
In each non-metropolitan nonattainment or maintenance area the Oregon
Department of Transportation shall facilitate a meeting of the affected
agencies listed in subsection (1)(c) of this rule prior to making conformity
determinations to:
(i) Determine which minor
arterials or other transportation projects shall be considered "regionally
significant";
(ii) Determine which
projects have undergone significant changes in design concept and scope since
the regional emissions analysis was performed;
(iii) Evaluate whether projects otherwise
exempted from meeting the requirements of this rule should be treated as
non-exempt in cases where potential adverse emissions impacts may exist for any
reason;
(iv) Make a determination,
as required by 40 CFR § 93.113, whether past obstacles to implementation
of TCMs which are behind the schedule established in the applicable
implementation plan have been identified and are being overcome, and whether
State and local agencies with influence over approvals or funding for TCMs are
giving maximum priority to approval or funding for TCMs; this consultation
process shall also consider whether delays in TCM implementation necessitate
revisions to the applicable implementation plan to remove TCMs or substitute
TCMs or other emission reduction measures;
(v) Identify, as required by 40 CFR §
93.123 projects located at sites in PM10 or PM2.5 nonattainment or maintenance
areas which have vehicle and roadway emission and dispersion characteristics
which are essentially identical to those at sites which have violations
verified by monitoring, and therefore require quantitative PM10 or
PM2.5hot-spot analysis;
(vi) Confer
on the forecast of vehicle miles traveled, and any amendments
thereto;
(vii) Determine whether
the project sponsor has demonstrated that the requirements of 40 CFR §
93.116, 40 CFR § 93.118, and 40 CFR § 93.119 are satisfied without a
particular mitigation or control measure, as provided in;
(viii) Evaluate events which will trigger new
conformity determinations in addition to those triggering events established in
40 CFR § 93.104;
(ix) Assure
that plans for construction of regionally significant projects which are not
Federal Highway Administration/Federal Transit Administration projects,
including projects for which alternative locations, design concept and scope,
or the no-build option are still being considered, are disclosed on a regular
basis, and assuring that any changes to those plans are immediately
disclosed.
(x) Confer on the
design, schedule, and funding of research and data collection efforts and
transportation model development (e.g., household/travel transportation
surveys).
(xi) Establish
appropriate public participation opportunities for project-level conformity
determinations required by this rule in the manner specified by 23 CFR Part
450;
(xii) Provide notification of
transportation plan or TIP revisions or amendments which merely add or delete
exempt projects listed in 40 CFR § 93.126 and 40 CFR § 93.127;
and
(xiii) Choose conformity tests
and methodologies for non-metropolitan nonattainment and maintenance areas, as
required by 40 CFR § 93.109.
(C) The Oregon Department of Transportation
shall consult with all other agencies identified under subsection (1)(c) of
this rule with an interest in the document to be developed, shall provide all
appropriate information to those agencies needed for meaningful input, and
consider the views of each such agency. All draft regional conformity
determinations as well as, supporting documentation shall be made available to
agencies with an interest in the document and those agencies shall be given at
least 30 days to submit comments on the draft document. Oregon Department of
Transportation shall respond to substantive comments received from other
agencies in a timely, substantive written manner at least 7 days prior to any
final decision on such document. Such views and written response shall be made
part of the record of any decision or action.
(D) Meetings hereby required shall be open to
the public. Timely written notification of any meetings relating to conformity
shall be provided to those members of the public who have requested such
notification. In addition, reasonable efforts shall be made to identify and
provide timely written notification to interested parties.
(E) If no transportation projects are
proposed for the upcoming fiscal year, there is no obligation to facilitate the
annual meeting required by paragraphs (2)(d)(B) & (C) of this
rule.
(F) The meetings required by
paragraphs (2)(d)(B) & (C) of this rule may take place using
telecommunications equipment, where appropriate.
(e) An MPO or Oregon Department of
Transportation shall facilitate an annual statewide meeting, unless otherwise
agreed upon by Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality and the MPOs, of the affected agencies listed in
subsection (1)(c) to review procedures for regional emissions and hot-spot
modeling.
(A) The members of each agency
shall annually jointly review the procedures used by affected MPOs and agencies
to determine that the requirements of 40 CFR § 93.122 are being met by the
appropriate agency.
(B) An MPO or
Oregon Department of Transportation shall facilitate a statewide meeting of
parties listed in subsection (1)(c) of this rule to receive comment on the
United States Environmental Protection Agency guidelines on hot-spot modeling,
to determine the adequacy of the guidelines, and to make recommendations for
improved hot-spot modeling to the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Regional Administrator. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Lane
Regional Air Protection Agency, or any other regional air authority, may make
recommendations for improved hot-spot modeling guidelines to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency Regional Administrator with the concurrence of
Oregon Department of Transportation. Oregon Department of Transportation may
make recommendations for improved hot-spot modeling guidelines to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Administrator with the
concurrence of the affected air quality agency (e.g., Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality, Lane Regional Air Protection Agency or any other
regional air authority).
(C) The
MPO or Oregon Department of Transportation shall determine whether the
transportation modeling procedures are in compliance with the modeling
requirements of40 CFR § 93.122. The Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality or Lane Regional Air Protection Agency (in Lane County), or any other
regional air authority, shall determine whether the modeling procedures are in
compliance with the air quality emissions modeling requirements of 40 CFR
§ 93.122.
(D) The affected
agencies shall evaluate and choose a model (or models) and associated methods
and assumptions to be used in Hot-Spot Analyses and regional emissions
analyses.
(f) The
Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration will, for any
proposed or anticipated transportation improvement program (TIP) or
transportation plan conformity determination, provide a draft conformity
determination to the Environmental Protection Agency for review and comment.
The Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration shall
allow a minimum of 14 days for EPA to respond. The United States Department of
Transportation shall respond in writing to any significant comments raised by
the Environmental Protection Agency before making a final decision. In
addition, where the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit
Administration request any new or revised information to support a TIP or
transportation plan conformity determination, The Federal Highway
Administration and Federal Transit Administration shall either return the
conformity determination for additional consultation under subsections (2)(b)
or (2)(d) of this rule, or the Federal Highway Administration and Federal
Transit Administration shall provide the new information to the agencies listed
in subsection (1)(c) of this rule for review and comment. Where the Federal
Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration choose to provide the
new or additional information to the affected agencies listed in subsection
(1)(c), the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration
shall allow for a minimum of 14 days to respond to any new or revised
supporting information; the United States Department of Transportation shall
respond in writing to any significant comments raised by the agencies consulted
on the new or revised supporting information before making a final
decision.
(g) Each agency subject
to an interagency consultation process under this rule (including any Federal
agency) shall provide each final document that is the product of such
consultation process, together with all supporting information that has not
been the subject of any previous consultation required by this rule, to each
other agency that has participated in the consultation process within 14 days
of adopting or approving such document or making such determination. Any such
agency may supply a checklist of available supporting information, which such
other participating agencies may use to request all or part of such supporting
information, in lieu of generally distributing all supporting
information.
(h) It shall be the
affirmative responsibility of the agency with the responsibility for preparing
a transportation plan or TIP revision which merely adds or deletes exempt
projects listed in OAR 40 CFR § 93.126 to initiate the process by
notifying other participants early in the process of decision on the final
document and assure that all relevant documents and information are supplied to
all participants in the consultation process in a timely manner.
(i) A meeting that is scheduled or required
for another purpose may be used for the purposes of consultation required by
this rule if the conformity consultation purpose is identified in the public
notice for the meeting.
(j) It
shall be the affirmative responsibility of a project sponsor to consult with
the affected transportation and air quality agencies prior to making a project
level conformity determination required by this rule.
(3) Resolving conflicts.
(a) Any conflict among State agencies or
between State agencies and an MPO shall be escalated to the Governor if the
conflict cannot be resolved by the heads of the involved agencies. In the first
instance, such agencies shall make every effort to resolve any differences,
including personal meetings between the heads of such agencies or their
policy-level representatives, to the extent possible.
(b) A State agency, regional air authority,
or MPO has 14 calendar days to appeal a determination of conformity, SIP
submittal, or other decision under this division, to the Governor after the
State agency, regional air authority, or MPO has been notified of the
resolution of all comments on such proposed determination of conformity, SIP
submittal, or decision. If an appeal is made to the Governor, the final
conformity determination, SIP submittal, or policy decision must have the
concurrence of the Governor. The appealing agency must provide notice of any
appeal under this subsection to the lead agency. If an action is not appealed
to the Governor within 14 days, the lead agency may proceed.
(c) The Governor may delegate the role of
hearing any such appeal under this section and of deciding whether to concur in
the conformity determination to another official or agency within the State,
but not to the head or staff of the State air quality agency or any local air
quality agency, the State department of transportation, a State transportation
commission or board, the Environmental Quality Commission, any agency that has
responsibility for only one of these functions, or an MPO.
(4) Public consultation procedures. Affected
agencies making conformity determinations on transportation plans, programs,
and projects shall establish a proactive public involvement process which
provides opportunity for public review and comment by, at a minimum, providing
reasonable public access to technical and policy information considered by the
agency at the beginning of the public comment period and prior to taking formal
action on a conformity determination for all transportation plans and TIPs,
consistent with these requirements and those or 23 CFR
450.316(a). Any charges imposed for public
inspection and copying should be consistent with the fee schedule contained in
49 CFR 7.43. In addition, these agencies must
specifically address in writing all public comments that known plans for a
regionally significant project which is not receiving FHWA or FTA funding or
approval have not been properly reflected in the emissions analysis supporting
a proposed conformity finding for a transportation plan or TIP. These agencies
shall also provide opportunity for public involvement in conformity
determinations for projects where otherwise required by law.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the Environmental Quality Commission under OAR 340-200-0040.
Notes
Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.035
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.