Or. Admin. Code § 137-140-0010 - Policy and Purpose
(1) The
integrity and significance of biological evidence in the detection,
apprehension, and prosecution of criminal offenders, as well as the exoneration
of persons wrongfully convicted of criminal offenses, is essential. The
integrity, admissibility, and use in criminal cases is therefore contingent on
the proper collection, preservation, retention, and cataloging of trace
biological evidence. In addition, current DNA technology allows for very small
amounts of biological evidence to be analyzed and tested for DNA and DNA
profiling and inadvertent contamination of biological evidence is therefore
possible if custodians who collect, retain, preserve, and catalogue biological
evidence do not take safety and contamination prevention precautions.
Accordingly, care must be taken to prevent contamination and loss of biological
evidence.
(2) Effective June 29,
2009, the Oregon legislature enacted Oregon Laws 2009, chapter 489 (Senate Bill
310) that required custodians to preserve biological evidence that is collected
as part of a criminal investigation into a covered offense or that was in the
possession of the custodian prior to any person being convicted of a covered
offense that could reasonably be used to incriminate or exculpate any person
for a covered offense. The legislature further required custodians to preserve
biological evidence in amounts and manners sufficient to develop a DNA profile
from such biological evidence.
(3)
Effective June 7, 2011, the Oregon legislature amended Senate Bill 310 (2009)
by Oregon Laws 2011, chapter 275 (Senate Bill 731) and enacted retention
periods, processes and procedures that custodians are required to follow for
the preservation and disposition of biological evidence. Additionally, the
legislature required the Oregon Attorney General to adopt administrative rules
that establishes the standards for the proper collection, retention,
preservation and cataloging of biological evidence applicable to criminal
investigations into, and criminal prosecution for, covered offenses. The Oregon
Attorney General is further required to adopt by administrative rule a standard
form for use by custodians when providing written notice to district attorneys
for early disposition of biological evidence for covered offenses.
(4) It is the policy of the Oregon Attorney
General that the best scientific methods should be used in the collection,
retention, preservation, and cataloguing of trace biological evidence. However,
when selecting detection, collection, preservation, retention, and cataloguing
methods and biological evidence processing sequences, custodians should
consider the circumstances of each case, the ambient conditions under which the
evidence is detected, the discriminatory power of the different detection and
collection techniques, and the need to preserve or collect other types of
evidence. Custodian personnel responsible for the detection and collection of
biological evidence should be aware that various types of evidence might be
present during the processing of a crime scene and that evidence other than
trace biological evidence may be more significant to a particular case and
therefore should be given higher priority. Custodians should contact the Oregon
State Police Forensic Services Division with any questions regarding best
scientific practices for the collection, retention, preservation, and
cataloguing of specific items of trace biological evidence not listed in these
administrative rules.
(5) These
administrative rules provide best practice scientific guidelines, procedures
and techniques for the collection, retention, preservation, and cataloguing of
trace biological evidence from crimes scenes, individuals, and items to be
submitted to the Oregon State Police Forensic Services Division for testing,
analysis, or DNA profiling for covered offenses. Therefore, a custodian's
failure to follow a particular guideline or administrative rule should not be
construed as rendering subject biological evidence inadmissible in any judicial
or administrative proceeding. Instead, in the event of a custodian's failure to
follow a particular guideline or administrative rule, it remains within the
judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to determine the relevance,
admissibility and weight to be given for any biological evidence.
Notes
Stat. Auth.: ORS 133.709
Stat. Implemented: ORS 133.705-133.717
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.