Or. Admin. Code § 340-120-0010 - Contents of an Authorization to Proceed Request
(1) An Authorization to Proceed request shall
demonstrate that the proposed facility meets the criteria presented in section
(2) of this rule. If the facility does not meet all of the criteria, the
Department shall deny the request.
(2) Criteria that must be met to obtain an
Authorization to Proceed:
(a) Need:
(A) The facility is needed because:
(i) Of a lack of adequate current treatment
or disposal capacity to handle hazardous waste or PCB generated by Oregon
companies; or
(ii) Its operation
would result in a higher level of protection of the public health and safety or
environment; or
(iii) Its operation
will significantly lower treatment or disposal costs to Oregon companies,
excluding transportation costs within states that are parties to the Northwest
Interstate Compact on Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management as set forth in
ORS 469.930.
(B) The facility shall significantly add to
the range of the hazardous waste or PCB handled or to the type of technology
already employed at a permitted treatment or disposal facility in states that
are parties to the Northwest Interstate Compact on Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Management;
(C) Notwithstanding the
provisions of paragraph (2)(a)(A) of this rule, the Department may deny an
Authorization to Proceed request if the Department finds that capacity at other
treatment or disposal facilities negate the need for a particular facility in
Oregon
(b) Capacity:
(A) The facility shall not be sized less than
what is needed, in conjunction with existing facilities in the Northwest
Compact States, to treat or dispose of all hazardous waste or PCB generated, or
reasonably projected to be generated over the next ten years, in
Oregon;
(B) The facility shall not
be sized greater than needed to treat or dispose of all hazardous waste or PCB
generated, or reasonably projected to be generated over the next ten years, in
states that are parties to the Northwest Interstate Compact on Low-Level
Radioactive Waste Management;
(C)
If the facility is sized to treat or dispose of more hazardous waste or PCB
generated outside Oregon than hazardous waste or PCB generated in Oregon, the
applicant must demonstrate to the Department that the additional size is needed
to make the proposed facility economically feasible;
(D) If all of the criteria of rule
340-120-0010(2)
are met, the Commission may give preference to a proposed facility which is
sized more closely to what is needed to treat or dispose of hazardous waste or
PCB generated in Oregon.
(c) Technology and Design. The facility shall
use the best available technology as determined by the Department for treatment
and disposal of hazardous waste and PCB. The facility shall use the highest and
best practicable treatment and/or control as determined by the Department to
protect public health and safety and the environment;
(d) Location:
(A) The facility shall be sited at least one
mile from:
(i) Areas within urban growth
boundaries as defined by ORS
197.295;
(ii) Wilderness, parks, and recreation areas
as designated or identified (if appropriate) in the applicable local
comprehensive plan or zoning maps;
(iii) Schools, churches, hospitals, nursing
homes, retail centers, stadiums, auditoriums and residences except those owned
by the applicant and necessary for the operation of the facility.
(B) The Department may consider a
lesser distance for subparagraphs (2)(d)(A)(ii) and (iii) if the applicant
demonstrates that the lesser distance adequately protects the public health and
safety and the environment.
(e) Property Line Setback:
(A) Hazardous waste and PCB treatment and
disposal facilities, other than land disposal facilities, on the site of waste
generation shall have at least a 250 foot separation between active waste
management areas and facilities, and property boundaries;
(B) Hazardous waste and PCB treatment and
disposal facilities off the site of waste generation and land disposal
facilities on the site of waste generation shall have at least a 1,000 foot
separation between active waste management areas and facilities, and property
boundaries.
(f)
Groundwater Protection:
(A) Using the
Groundwater Quality Protection Evaluation Matrix as shown in Table 2 of this
Division:
(i) Surface impoundments, land
treatment facilities and waste piles shall only be located on an area rated as
2 or 3;
(ii) Landfills shall only
be located on an area rated as 3.
(B) Hazardous waste and PCB facilities not
listed in subparagraphs (2)(f)(A)(i) or (2)(f)(A)(ii) need not meet this
criterion to obtain an Authorization to Proceed.
(g) Owner and Operator Capability. The owner,
any parent company of the owner and the operator must demonstrate adequate
financial and technical capability to properly construct and operate the
facility. As evidence of financial capability, the following shall be
submitted:
(A) Financial statements of the
owner, any parent company of the owner, and the operator audited by an
independent certified public accountant for three years immediately prior to
the application;
(B) The estimated
cost of construction and a plan detailing how the construction will be funded;
and
(C) A three-year projection,
from the date the facility is scheduled to begin operating, of revenues and
expenditures related to operating the facility. The projection should have
sufficient detail to determine the financial capability of the owner, any
parent company of the owner and the operator to properly operate the
facility.
(h) Compliance
History:
(A) The compliance history in owning
and operating other similar facilities, if any, must indicate that the owner,
any parent company of the owner and the operator have an ability and
willingness to operate the proposed facility in compliance with the provisions
of ORS Chapter 466 and any permit conditions that may be issued by the
Department or Commission. As evidence of ability and willingness, the following
shall be submitted:
(i) A listing of all
responses to past actual violations identified by EPA or the appropriate state
regulatory agency within the five years immediately preceding the filing of the
request for an Authorization to Proceed at any similar facility owned or
operated by the applicant, owner, any parent company of the owner or operator
during the period when the actions causing the violations occurred;
and
(ii) Any written correspondence
from EPA and the appropriate state regulatory agency which discusses the
present compliance status of any similar facility owned or operated by the
applicant, owner, any parent company of the owner or operator.
(B) Upon request of the
Department, the applicant shall also provide responses to the past violations
identified prior to the five years preceding the filing of an Authorization to
Proceed and the specific compliance history for a particular facility owned or
operated by the applicant, any parent company of the owner or
operator.
Notes
To view tables referenced in rule text, click here to view rule.
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 466 & 468
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 466.045, 466.055, 466.060 & 468.020
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.