Or. Admin. Code § 635-500-6625 - Implementing the Lower Columbia River and Oregon Coast White Sturgeon Conservation Plan
(1)
Policy. The Lower Columbia River and Oregon Coast White Sturgeon
Conservation Plan (LCROC White Sturgeon Plan) (State of Oregon 2011, available
at Department offices) implements the State's strategy for protecting and
enhancing Oregon white sturgeon in the lower Columbia River and in Oregon
coastal and marine habitats, in cooperation with other federal and local
partners, including Oregon Plan natural resource agencies. The LCROC White
Sturgeon Plan is consistent with the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds and
the Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan. This rule describes
the Commission's contribution toward this collective effort and directs the
Department's implementation of the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan. This rule
describes the Department's role in implementing the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan
consistent with the Department's statutory authorities and the Native Fish
Conservation Policy (OAR
635-007-0502 thru
635-007-0505). The rule is not
intended to be a rigid recipe but rather to identify the range of opportunities
the Department should pursue and how the effectiveness of those opportunities
should be evaluated, following the template first established in the Native
Fish Conservation Policy.
(2)
Description of the Species Management Unit and Populations. All
white sturgeon in Oregon are represented by one Species Management Unit (SMU)
and one population. However, there are seven population segments within the SMU
that are managed as more discrete units: Lower Columbia/Oregon Coast;
Bonneville Reservoir; The Dalles Reservoir; John Day Reservoir; McNary
Reservoir; Middle Snake River (downstream from Hells Canyon Dam); and Mid Snake
Reservoirs (upstream from Hells Canyon Dam). The LCROC White Sturgeon Plan
addresses the Lower Columbia/Oregon Coast population segment (LCROC white
sturgeon), which is comprised of white sturgeon inhabiting the mainstem lower
Columbia River downstream from Bonneville Dam, adjacent Oregon freshwater
habitats (including the Willamette River downstream from Willamette Falls), and
Oregon coastal and marine habitats. It also addresses white sturgeon in the
Willamette River upstream from Willamette Falls, although this area is not part
of the SMU.
(3)
Desired
Status.
(a) Broad Sense Goals. The
goals of the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan are to avoid any substantial reductions
in the Lower Columbia/Oregon Coast white sturgeon population segment; to
maintain a naturally reproducing population segment that makes full use of
natural habitats and provides ecological, economic, and cultural benefits to
Oregon residents; and to provide sustainable commercial and recreational
fishing opportunities. LCROC white sturgeon are important to Oregon and the
region as a whole. Ensuring persistence and genetic diversity of the species
and its ecological niche, now and for future generations, is necessary to
maintain the social, cultural and economic benefits this population segment
currently provides.
(b) Measurable
criteria for biological attributes are defined in Section 6 of the LCROC White
Sturgeon Plan. Primary Biological Attributes include:
(A) Abundance: number of individuals at a
given life stage.
(B) Distribution:
where and when individuals at each life stage are found throughout their
historic range.
(C) Diversity: the
level of genetic variation and how that variation is expressed within the
population segment.
(D)
Productivity: how well the population segment is able to sustain and/or
increase its abundance over time.
(E) Habitat: the quantity, quality and
distribution of habitat types important to various life stages.
(F) Persistence: the likelihood that the
population segment will maintain its existence and remain viable over
time.
(4)
Current Status. The current status of LCROC white sturgeon at the
time of the adoption of this rule is described in Section 7 of the LCROC White
Sturgeon Plan. The biological attributes, criteria and metrics used to assess
current status are adopted by reference into this rule. The Department shall
update current status periodically consistent with timelines described in
Section 12 (Adaptive Management) of the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan. These
updates do not require rule modification of current status, but rather will
serve as a measurement of progress toward desired status.
(5)
Principal Limiting Factors.
(a) Numerous factors that contribute to the
gap between current and desired status of LCROC white sturgeon are described in
Section 9 of the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan.
(b) Factors of particular concern are:
(A) Predation by Marine Mammals;
(B) River Flow and Flow Variation;
(C) Habitat Quality and Quantity;
and
(D) Overharvest.
(c) Staff will continue to work
with others to refine existing and identify new management actions that address
the limiting factors identified in the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan. Staff may
analyze the limiting factors at a finer, more localized scale when selecting or
prioritizing management actions for specific areas. These analyses may find
primary and secondary factors different at a local scale than those for the
entire Lower Columbia/Oregon Coast white sturgeon population segment.
(6)
Management
Strategies. Management strategies to address limiting factors for LCROC
white sturgeon are identified in Section 11 of the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan.
Staff shall advocate for the implementation of, and where appropriate endeavor
to implement these management strategies as mechanisms to reach the desired
status. Strategies to address factors generally causing the gap between current
and desired status for LCROC white sturgeon include:
(a)
Short-term Strategies (1
to 5 years).
(A) Minimize marine mammal
predation.
(B) Optimize the
configuration and operations of the Columbia River hydropower system to best
mimic a natural hydrograph and normative river conditions.
(C) Minimize incidental mortality associated
with hydrosystem operations.
(D)
Protect and restore high-quality habitat in the lower Columbia River and
adjacent waters, including the Willamette River and coastal bays, estuaries and
rivers.
(E) Maintain water quality
in the lower Columbia River.
(F)
Prevent, and when unavoidable, mitigate for impacts associated with in-water
work activity.
(G) Manage lower
Columbia River white sturgeon sport and commercial fisheries to not exceed
sustainable harvest levels.
(b)
Additional Long-term
strategies (1 to 25 years).
(A)
Restore Columbia River connectivity by providing improved passage at hydropower
projects.
(B) Minimize the impacts
of piscine predation.
(7)
Adaptive Management. The
Department shall employ adaptive management principles within its statutory
authority in support of achieving the desired status goal for LCROC white
sturgeon by participating in the adaptive management and implementation
processes defined in Section 12 of the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan. Pursuant to
the adaptive management framework, a White Sturgeon Technical Management Team
(WSTMT) will be formed to monitor the status of LCROC white sturgeon. The WSTMT
will be made up of representatives from the Department, Washington Department
of Fish and Wildlife, other regional natural resource managers, and sturgeon
experts. The Department's contribution to adaptive management of LCROC white
sturgeon will include five elements: research, monitoring, evaluation, a
feedback loop, and reporting.
(a)
Research. The Department shall support high-priority research
identified in the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan that addresses uncertainties
related to management strategies and actions needed to achieve desired status.
Research needs at the time of adoption (but which are not intended to be an
exclusive list of research projects to be pursued) are identified in the LCROC
White Sturgeon Plan in Section 11. Future research needs shall be identified by
the WSTMT during periodic assessments of the effectiveness of the LCROC White
Sturgeon Plan.
(b)
Monitoring. The Department shall continue to identify,
implement, and support monitoring needed to assess the status of LCROC white
sturgeon relative to desired status criteria and habitat status trends as
funding allows. Monitoring needs at the time of adoption are identified in the
LCROC White Sturgeon Plan in Section 11. Future monitoring needs shall be
identified by the WSTMT during periodic assessments of the effectiveness of the
LCROC White Sturgeon Plan.
(c)
Evaluation. The Department shall continue to identify and
support evaluation needed to assess the status of LCROC white sturgeon and the
effectiveness of management strategies and actions in achieving their intended
outcomes. Evaluation needs at the time of adoption are identified in the LCROC
White Sturgeon Plan in Section 11. Future evaluation needs shall be identified
by the WSTMT during periodic assessments of the effectiveness of the LCROC
White Sturgeon Plan.
(d)
Feedback Loop. The Department shall review the results of
reports and assessments identified in
635-500-6625(7)(e)
and modify management strategies and actions as appropriate and within its
statutory authority based on the review results. The Department shall recommend
to other agencies or entities, as necessary, appropriate modifications to
management strategies and actions needed to support attainment of the desired
status goals and avoid conservation status for LCROC white sturgeon. This
feedback shall include refinement of management actions, research, monitoring
and evaluation programs and desired status criteria based on the best available
scientific information. In Section 6 of the LCROC White Sturgeon Plan,
conservation status thresholds for biological attributes are described, each of
which represent conditions in which the future persistence of the population
becomes unpredictable without significant management action. These thresholds
will be used by the WSTMT to determine if temporary modifications to management
strategies or actions are needed. In the event that temporary modifications do
not rectify the conservation status of these biological attributes within a
reasonable time frame, a review of the status of LCROC white sturgeon and the
LCROC White Sturgeon Plan will be conducted by the WSTMT.
(e)
Reporting. The WSTMT
shall meet periodically to review the status of LCROC white sturgeon,
especially as it pertains to desired and conservation status. In addition to
reviewing the current status, the WSTMT will monitor progress toward addressing
the constraints, limiting factors, threats, critical uncertainties, and data
gaps. The results of the status review will be published on the Department
website as a management report. The WSTMT shall produce an in-depth review of
the status of LCROC white sturgeon at five-year intervals. Any reports
generated or data collected will be made available to the public.
(8)
Impact on Other Native
Fish Species. Management strategies identified in the LCROC White
Sturgeon Plan are likely to be beneficial to other native fish species present
in the range of LCROC white sturgeon because they focus on restoring natural
processes. New or modified actions shall consider impacts to other native
species, as appropriate, to minimize harm and optimize
benefits.
Notes
Stat. Auth.: ORS 496.138, 496.146 and 506.119
Stats. Implemented: ORS 506.109
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.