204 Pa. Code r. 3.5 - Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal
A lawyer shall not:
(a) seek to influence a judge, juror,
prospective juror or other official by means prohibited by law;
(b) communicate ex parte with such a person
during the proceeding unless authorized to do so by law or court
order;
(c) communicate with a juror
or prospective juror after discharge of the jury if:
(1) the communication is prohibited by law or
court order;
(2) the juror has made
known to the lawyer a desire not to communicate; or
(3) the communication involves
misrepresentation, coercion, duress or harassment; or
(d) engage in conduct intended to disrupt a
tribunal.
Comment:
(1) Many forms of improper influence upon a
tribunal are proscribed by criminal law. Others are specified in the Code of
Judicial Conduct and/or the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct for
Magisterial District Judges, with which an advocate should be familiar. A
lawyer is required to avoid contributing to a violation of such
provisions.
(2) During a proceeding
a lawyer may not communicate ex parte with persons serving in an official
capacity in the proceeding, such as judges, masters or jurors, unless
authorized to do so by law or court order.
(3) A lawyer may on occasion want to
communicate with a juror or prospective juror after the jury has been
discharged. The lawyer may do so unless the communication is prohibited by law
or a court order but must respect the desire of the juror not to talk with the
lawyer. The lawyer may not engage in improper conduct during the
communication.
(4) The advocate's
function is to present evidence and argument so that the cause may be decided
according to law. Refraining from abusive or obstreperous conduct is a
corollary of the advocate's right to speak on behalf of litigants. A lawyer may
stand firm against abuse by a judge but should avoid reciprocation; the judge's
default is no justification for similar dereliction by an advocate. An advocate
can present the cause, protect the record for subsequent review and preserve
professional integrity by patient firmness no less effectively than by
belligerence or theatrics.
(5) The
duty to refrain from disruptive conduct applies to any proceeding of a
tribunal, including a deposition. See Rule
1.0(m).
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.