31 Pa. Code § 89a.118 - Premium rate schedule increases
(a) This section shall apply as follows:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), this
section applies to a long-term care policy or certificate issued in this
Commonwealth on or after September 16, 2002.
(2) For certificates issued on or after March
16, 2002, under a group long-term care insurance policy as defined in section
1103 of the act (40 P. S. §
991.1103),
which policy was in force on March 16, 2002, this section shall apply on the
policy anniversary following March 17, 2003.
(b) An insurer shall provide notice of a
pending premium rate schedule increase, including an exceptional increase , to
the Commissioner subject the Accident and Health Filing Reform Act (40 P. S.
§§ 3801-3815) prior to the notice to the policyholders and shall
include all of the following:
(1) Information
required by §
89a.108 (relating to required
disclosure of rating practices to consumers).
(2) Certification by a qualified actuary
that:
(i) If the requested premium rate
schedule increase is implemented and the underlying assumptions, which reflect
moderately adverse conditions, are realized, no further premium rate schedule
increases are anticipated.
(ii) The
premium rate filing is in compliance with this section.
(3) An actuarial memorandum justifying the
rate schedule change request that includes the following:
(i) Lifetime projections of earned premiums
and incurred claims based on the filed premium rate schedule increase; and the
method and assumptions used in determining the projected values, including
reflection of assumptions that deviate from those used for pricing other forms
currently available for sale.
(A) Annual
values for the 5 years preceding and the 3 years following the valuation date
shall be provided separately.
(B)
The projections shall include the development of the lifetime loss ratio,
unless the rate increase is an exceptional increase .
(C) The projections shall demonstrate
compliance with subsection (c).
(D)
For exceptional increases, the projected experience should be limited to the
increases in claims expenses attributable to the approved reasons for the
exceptional increase . If the Commissioner determines as provided in §
89a.103 (relating to definitions)
that offsets may exist, the insurer shall use appropriate net projected
experience.
(ii)
Disclosure of how reserves have been incorporated in this rate increase
whenever the rate increase will trigger contingent benefit upon
lapse.
(iii) Disclosure of the
analysis performed to determine why a rate adjustment is necessary, which
pricing assumptions were not realized and why, and what other actions taken by
the company have been relied on by the actuary.
(iv) A statement that policy design,
underwriting and claims adjudication practices have been taken into
consideration.
(v) In the event
that it is necessary to maintain consistent premium rates for new certificates
and certificates receiving a rate increase, the insurer will need to file
composite rates reflecting projections of new certificates.
(4) A statement that renewal premium rate
schedules are not greater than new business premium rate schedules except for
differences attributable to benefits, unless sufficient justification is
provided to the Commissioner .
(5)
Sufficient information for review subject to the Accident and Health Filing
Reform Act of the premium rate schedule increase by the Commissioner .
(c) Premium rate schedule
increases shall be determined in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) Exceptional increases shall provide that
70% of the present value of projected additional premiums from the exceptional
increase will be returned to policyholders in benefits.
(2) Premium rate schedule increases shall be
calculated so that the sum of the accumulated value of incurred claims, without
the inclusion of active life reserves, and the present value of future
projected incurred claims, without the inclusion of active life reserves, will
not be less than the sum of the following:
(i)
The accumulated value of the initial earned premium times 58%.
(ii) Eighty-five percent of the accumulated
value of prior premium rate schedule increases on an earned basis.
(iii) The present value of future projected
initial earned premiums times 58%.
(iv) Eighty-five percent of the present value
of future projected premiums not in this subsection on an earned
basis.
(3) If a policy
form has both exceptional and other increases, the values in paragraph (2)(ii)
and (iv) will also include 70% for exceptional rate increase amounts.
(4) The present and accumulated values used
to determine rate increases shall use the maximum valuation interest rate for
contract reserves as specified in Chapter 84a (relating to minimum reserve
standards for individual and group health and accident insurance contracts).
The actuary shall disclose as part of the actuarial memorandum the use of
appropriate averages.
(d)
For each rate increase that is implemented, the insurer shall file for review
subject to the Accident and Health Filing Reform Act by the Commissioner ,
updated projections, as defined in subsection (b)(3)(i), annually for the next
3 years and include a comparison of actual results to projected values. The
Commissioner may extend the period to greater than 3 years if actual results
are not consistent with projected values from prior projections. For group
insurance policies that meet the conditions in subsection (k), the projections
required by this subsection shall be provided to the policyholder in lieu of
filing with the Commissioner .
(e)
If a premium rate in the revised premium rate schedule is greater than 200% of
the comparable rate in the initial premium schedule, lifetime projections, as
defined in subsection (b)(3)(i), shall be filed for review subject to the
Accident and Health Filing Reform Act by the Commissioner every 5 years
following the end of the required period in subsection (d). For group insurance
policies that meet the conditions in subsection (k), the projections required
by this subsection shall be provided to the policyholder in lieu of filing with
the Commissioner .
(f) If the
Commissioner has determined that the actual experience following a rate
increase does not adequately match the projected experience and that the
current projections under moderately adverse conditions demonstrate that
incurred claims will not exceed proportions of premiums specified in subsection
(c), the Commissioner may require the insurer to implement premium rate
schedule adjustments, or other measures to reduce the difference between the
projected and actual experience. In determining whether the actual experience
adequately matches the projected experience, consideration should be given to
subsection (b)(3)(v), if applicable.
(g) If the majority of the policies or
certificates to which the increase is applicable are eligible for the
contingent benefit upon lapse, the insurer shall file the following:
(1) A plan, subject to Commissioner approval,
for improved administration or claims processing designed to eliminate the
potential for further deterioration of the policy form requiring further
premium rate schedule increases, or both, or to demonstrate that appropriate
administration and claims processing have been implemented or are in effect;
otherwise the Commissioner may impose the condition in subsection
(h).
(2) The original anticipated
lifetime loss ratio, and the premium rate schedule increase that would have
been calculated according to subsection (c) had the greater of the original
anticipated lifetime loss ratio or 58% been used in the calculations described
in subsection (c)(1)(i) and (iii)
(h) For a rate increase filing that meets the
following criteria, the Commissioner will review, for all policies included in
the filing, the projected lapse rates and past lapse rates during the 12 months
following each increase to determine if significant adverse lapsation has
occurred or is anticipated:
(1) The rate
increase is not the first rate increase requested for the specific policy form
or forms.
(2) The rate increase is
not an exceptional increase .
(3)
The majority of the policies or certificates to which the increase is
applicable are eligible for the contingent benefit upon lapse.
(i) If significant adverse
lapsation has occurred, is anticipated in the filing or is evidenced in the
actual results as presented in the updated projections provided by the insurer
following the requested rate increase, the Commissioner may determine that a
rate spiral exists. Following the determination that a rate spiral exists, the
Commissioner may require the insurer to offer, without underwriting, to all in
force insureds subject to the rate increase the option to replace existing
coverage with one or more reasonably comparable products being offered by the
insurer or its affiliates.
(1) The offer
shall:
(i) Be subject to the approval of the
Commissioner .
(ii) Be based on
actuarially sound principles, but not be based on attained age.
(iii) Provide that maximum benefits under a
new policy accepted by an insured shall be reduced by comparable benefits
already paid under the existing policy .
(2) The insurer shall maintain the experience
of all the replacement insureds separate from the experience of insureds
originally issued the policy forms. In the event of a request for a rate
increase on the policy form, the rate increase shall be limited to the lesser
of:
(i) The maximum rate increase determined
based on the combined experience.
(ii) The maximum rate increase determined
based only on the experience of the insureds originally issued the form plus
10%.
(j) If the
Commissioner determines that the insurer has exhibited a persistent practice of
filing inadequate initial premium rates for long-term care insurance , the
Commissioner may, in addition to the provisions of subsection (h), prohibit the
insurer from either of the following:
(1)
Filing and marketing comparable coverage for up to 5 years.
(2) Offering all other similar coverages and
limiting marketing of new applications to the products subject to recent
premium rate schedule increases.
(k) Subsections (a)-(j) do not apply to
policies for which the long-term care benefits provided by the policy are
incidental , as defined in §
89a.103, if the policy complies
with the following conditions:
(1) The
interest credited internally to determine cash value accumulations, including
long-term care are guaranteed not to be less than the minimum guaranteed
interest rate for cash value accumulations without long-term care set forth in
the policy .
(2) An actuarial
memorandum is filed with the Department that includes the following:
(i) A description of the basis on which the
long-term care rates were determined.
(ii) A description of the basis for the
reserves.
(iii) A summary of the
type of policy , benefits, renewability, general marketing method and limits on
ages of issuance.
(iv) A
description and a table of each actuarial assumption used. For expenses, an
insurer shall include percent of premium dollars per policy and dollars per
unit of benefits.
(v) A description
and a table of the anticipated policy reserves and additional reserves to be
held in each future year for active lives.
(vi) The estimated average annual premium per
policy and the average issue age.
(vii) A statement as to whether underwriting
is performed at the time of application. The statement shall indicate whether
underwriting is used and, if used, the statement shall include a description of
the types of underwriting used, such as medical underwriting or functional
assessment underwriting. Concerning a group policy , the statement shall
indicate whether the enrollee or a dependent will be underwritten and when
underwriting occurs.
(viii) A
description of the effect of the long-term care policy provision on the
required premiums, nonforfeiture values and reserves on the underlying
insurance policy , both for active lives and those in long-term care claim
status.
(l)
Subsections (f) and (h) do not apply to group insurance policies as defined in
section 1103 of the act (40 P. S. §
991.1103) when either:
(1) The policies insure 250 or more persons
and the policyholder has 5,000 or more eligible employees of a single
employer.
(2) The policyholder, and
not the certificateholders, pays a material portion of the premium, which may
not be less than 20% of the total premium for the group in the calendar year
prior to the year a rate increase is filed.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.