Utah Admin. Code R131-1-10 - Disclosure of Submittals, Performance Evaluations, References and Award
(1) After the date
established for the first submittal of information, a register of submitting
architects and engineers shall be prepared and open to public inspection. Prior
to award, submittals and modifications shall be shown only to procurement
officials and other persons involved with the review and selection process who
shall adhere to the requirements of GRAMA and this rule.
(2) The Executive Director shall, throughout
the course of, and at the end of the contract, evaluate the performance of the
architectural/engineering firm; verbally and in writing. There shall be at
least one verbal review of the architectural/ engineering firm's performance on
each project, prior to the project's completion. The Executive Director shall
also advise the architectural/engineering firm, in writing, about their
performance at the end of the project. If the firm wishes to respond to those
evaluation(s), it may enter its response(s) in the file.
(3) Except as provided in this rule,
submittals shall be open to public inspection after notice of the selection
results.
(4) The classification of
records as protected and the treatment of such records shall be as provided in
Section
R131-4-411 A.
(5) The Board finds that it is
necessary to maintain the confidentiality of performance evaluations and
reference information in order to avoid competitive injury and to encourage
those persons providing the information to respond in an open and honest manner
without fear of retribution. Accordingly, records containing performance
evaluations and reference information are classified as protected records under
the provisions of Subsection
63G-2-305(6) and shall be disclosed only to those persons involved with the performance
evaluation, the architect-engineer that the information addresses and persons
involved with the review and selection of submittals. The Board or Executive
Director may, however, provide reference information to other governmental
entities for use in their procurement activities and to other parties when
requested by the architect-engineer that is the subject of the information. Any
other disclosure of such performance evaluations and reference information
shall only be as required by applicable law.
(6) Notice. After the selection of the
successful firm, notice of the selection shall be available in the principal
office of the Executive Director in Salt Lake City, Utah and may be available
on the Internet.
(7) Information
Disclosed. The following shall be disclosed with the notice of selection:
(a) the ranking of the firms;
(b) the names of the selection committee
members;
(c) the final scores used
by the selection committee to make the selection, except that the names of the
individual scorers shall not be associated with their individual scores;
and
(d) the written justification
statement supporting the selection.
(8) Information Classified as Protected.
After due consideration, the following has been determined by the Board to
impair governmental procurement proceedings or give an unfair advantage to any
person proposing to enter into a contract with the Board or Executive Director
and shall be classified as protected records:
(a) the names of individual selection
committee scorers in relation to their individual scores or rankings;
and
(b) non-public financial
statements.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.