Utah Admin. Code R131-4-806 - Decisions of Executive Director to be in Writing - Effect of no Writing
(1) The executive
director, or board if determined by the board, shall promptly issue a written
decision regarding any protest, debarment or suspension, or contract
controversy if it is not settled by a mutual agreement. The decision shall
state the reasons for the action taken and inform the protestor, contractor, or
prospective contractor of the right to judicial or administrative review as
provided in the Utah Procurement Code and R131-4.
(2) A decision shall be effective until
stayed or reversed on appeal, except to the extent provided in
R131-4-802.
A copy of the decision under Subsection (1) above shall be mailed or otherwise
furnished immediately to the protestor, prospective contractor, or contractor.
The decision shall be final and conclusive unless the protestor, prospective
contractor, or contractor appeals administratively to the procurement appeals
board in accordance with Subsection
63G-6-810(2) or the protestor, prospective contractor, or contractor commences an action in
district court in accordance with
R131-4-815 (Section
63G-6-815).
(3) If the executive director or
board, depending who is considering the matter, does not issue the written
decision regarding a contract controversy within 60 calendar days after written
request for a final decision, or within such longer period as may be agreed
upon by the parties, then the contractor may proceed as if an adverse decision
had been received.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.