Utah Admin. Code R131-4-819 - Effect of Violation after Award of Contract
The board recognizes Section 63G-6-819 as being applicable and therefore, if after an award it is determined administratively or upon administrative or judicial review that a solicitation or award of a contract is in violation of law:
(1) If the person awarded the contract has
not acted fraudulently or in bad faith:
(a)
The contract may be ratified and affirmed if it is determined that doing so is
in the best interests of the state; or
(b) The contract may be terminated and the
person awarded the contract shall be compensated for the actual expenses
reasonably incurred under the contract prior to termination, plus a reasonable
profit;
(2) If the
person awarded the contract has acted fraudulently or in bad faith:
(a) The contract may be declared null and
void; or
(b) The contract may be
ratified and affirmed if such action is in the best interests of the state,
without prejudice to the board's and the state's rights to any appropriate
damages.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.