Utah Admin. Code R151-4-109 - Extension of Time and Continuance of Hearing
(1) When ruling on a motion or request for
extension of time or continuance of a hearing, the presiding officer shall
consider:
(a) whether there is good cause for
granting the extension or continuance;
(b) the number of extensions or continuances
the requesting party has already received;
(c) whether the extension or continuance will
work a significant hardship upon the other party;
(d) whether the extension or continuance will
be prejudicial to the health, safety or welfare of the public; and
(e) whether the other party objects to the
extension or continuance.
(2)
(a)
Except as provided in Subsection R151-4-109(2)(b), an extension of a time
period or a continuance of a hearing may not result in the hearing being
concluded more than 240 calendar days after the day:
(i) the notice of agency action was issued;
or
(ii) the initial decision as to
a request for agency action was issued.
(b) An extension of a time period or a
continuance may exceed the time restriction in Subsection R151-4-109(2)(a) only
if:
(i)
(A)
a party provides an affidavit or certificate signed by a licensed physician
verifying that an illness of the party, the party's counsel, or a necessary
witness precludes the presence of the party, the party's counsel, or a
necessary witness at the hearing;
(B) counsel for a party withdraws shortly
before the final hearing, unless the presiding officer finds the withdrawal was
to delay the hearing; in that case the hearing will go forward with or without
counsel;
(C) a parallel criminal
proceeding or investigation exists based on facts at issue in the
administrative proceeding; in that case the continuance shall address the
expiration of the continuance upon the conclusion of the criminal proceeding;
or
(D) the board or commission
designated to act as the fact-finder at hearing is unavailable to meet on a
date that:
(I) allows the parties a reasonable
period of time for discovery, motion practice, or hearing preparation;
and
(II) falls within the 240-day
deadline for resolution; and
(ii) the presiding officer finds that
injustice would result from failing to grant the extension or
continuance.
(c)
(i) If the presiding officer considers that
extenuating circumstances not contemplated in Subsection R151-4-109(2)(b)
justify a continuance beyond the 240-day deadline, the presiding officer shall
file a written request for continuance with the executive director.
(ii) A party may not directly petition the
executive director for a continuance.
(iii) The executive director's decision on
the presiding officer's request for continuance shall be issued on an
interlocutory basis, not subject to a request for reconsideration or judicial
review until after a final order on the merits is issued.
(d) The failure to conclude a hearing within
the required time period is not a basis for dismissal.
(3) The presiding officer may not grant an
extension of time or continuance that is not authorized by statute or
rule.
(4) The factors in Subsection
(1) do not apply to a request for agency review filing made pursuant to
Subsection
R151-4-901(1)(a).
A request for an extension to file a request for agency review is governed by
Subsection
R151-4-901(1)(c).
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.