Utah Admin. Code R277-323-3 - School District Educator Evaluation Systems
(1) A local board shall adopt a district
educator evaluation system in consultation with a joint committee established
by the local board as required by Section
53G-11-506.
(2) A local board shall review and approve
its educator evaluation system in an open meeting.
(3) A district educator evaluation system
shall:
(a) evaluate educators based on the
Utah Effective Educator Standards;
(b) include a description of school district
processes for gathering, using, and protecting individual educator evaluation
data;
(c) include valid and
reliable methods and tools to implement an evaluation;
(d) include a systematic process for
evaluating all educators holding an educator license during an evaluation cycle
of up to four years;
(e) include a
summative evaluation rating consistent with this Rule R277-323; and
(f) take into account multiple inputs as
required by Section
53G-11-507, including:
(i) self-evaluation of performance in
relation to the Utah Effective Educator Standards;
(ii) student and parent input;
(iii) for administrators, feedback from
teachers, including input on the effectiveness of evaluating employee
performance in a school or school district for which the administrator has
responsibility;
(iv) results of
multiple observations done with tools aligned to the Utah Effective Educator
Standards;
(v) evidence of student
academic growth, as specified by the school district; and
(vi) other indicators of professional
improvement as specified by the school district.
(4) A school district may use an evaluation
cycle extending up to four years, which includes:
(a) a summative evaluation at least once
every four years; and
(b) annual
formative assessment measures, including:
(i)
at least one observation conducted by an administrator;
(ii) additional observations, with feedback,
which may be provided by a peer, mentor, instructional coach, administrator or
other professional designated by the district; and
(iii) a planned ongoing process for the
educator to engage in reflection and growth related to the Utah Effective
Teaching Standards.
(5) A school district may not use year-end
state testing data in determining an educator's summative evaluation
rating.
(6) A school district may
not use data from a student who is chronically absent in determining an
educator's summative evaluation rating.
(7) A school district shall align its
employee compensation system, with the district's educator evaluation system in
accordance with Subsection
53G-11-518(1).
(8) To form the school district's educator
evaluation system, a local school board may adopt:
(a) the Utah Model Educator Evaluation System
approved by the Board;
(b) an
adapted system; or
(c) a system
developed by the school district consistent with this rule and Rule
R277-330.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.