Utah Admin. Code R277-469-6 - Criteria for Recommendation of Instructional Materials Following Mid-Party Evaluation of Core Curriculum
(1) The
Superintendent and the Board, in reviewing whether to recommend instructional
materials, may consider whether the instructional materials:
(a) are consistent with Core
requirements;
(b) are mapped and
aligned to the Core and state -adopted assessments if planned for use as
primary materials;
(c) are high
quality, research-based, and proven to be effective in supporting student
learning;
(d) provide an objective
and balanced viewpoint on issues;
(e) include enrichment and extension
possibilities;
(f) are appropriate
to varying levels of learning;
(g)
are accurate and factual;
(h) are
arranged chronologically or systematically, or both;
(i) meets the requirements of Section
53E-2-204.1;
(j) are not sensitive
materials as defined in Subsection
53G-10-103(1)(h);
(k) are not prohibited discriminatory
practice as described in Section
53B-1-118;
(l) are consistent with the principles of
individual freedom as defined in Section
53G-10-206; and
(m) are of acceptable technical
quality.
(2) A
publisher, when submitting new primary material to be evaluated by the
Superintendent, shall submit an electronic version of that material in NIMAS
file format to NIMAC for use in conversion into Braille, large print, and other
formats for students with print disabilities.
(3) The Superintendent may require an LEA to
provide a report of instructional materials purchased by the LEA or a school in
the previous five years.
(4) The
Superintendent may initiate a formal or informal audit of instructional
materials purchased to determine purchase or use of instructional materials
consistent with the law or this rule.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.