Utah Admin. Code R309-705-6 - Applicant Priority System and Selection of Terms of Assistance

(1) Priority Determination.

The Board will use Table 1 to assign applicants for financial assistance a priority rank. The Board may modify an applicant's priority rank based on the following considerations.

(a) The project plans, specifications, contract, financing, or other measures of a project's readiness to proceed to construction of a lower priority applicant are ready for execution.
(b) Available funding.
(c) Acute health risk.
(d) Capacity Development, financial, technical, or managerial issues needing resolution to avoid EPA intervention.
(e) An Emergency.

Table 1

Priority System

Deficiency Description

Points Received

Source Quality or Quantity

Health Risk (select one)

A. There is evidence that waterborne illnesses have occurred.

25

B. There are reports of illnesses which may be waterborne.

20

C. High potential for waterborne illness exists.

15

D. Moderate potential for waterborne illness.

8

E. No evidence of potential health risks.

0

Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)

A. Source has been determined to be under the influence of surface water.

25

B. System is often out of water due to inadequate source capacity.

20

-or-

System capacity does not meet the requirements of UPDWR.

10

C. Source has a history of three or more confirmed microbiological violations within the last year.

10

D. Sources are not developed or protected according to UPDWR.

10

E. Source has confirmed MCL chemistry violations within the last year.

10

Total

100

Treatment

Deficiency Description

Points Available

Health Risk or Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)

A. Treatment system cannot consistently meet log removal requirements, turbidity standards, or other enforceable drinking water quality standards.

25

B. The required disinfection facilities are not installed, are inadequate, or fail to provide adequate water quality.

25

C. Treatment system is subject to impending failure or has failed.

25

-or-

Treatment system equipment does not meet demands of UPDWR including the lead or copper action levels.

20

-or-

System equipment is projected to become inadequate without upgrades.

5

Total

75

Storage

Deficiency Description

Points Available

Health Risk and Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)

A. Storage system is subject to impending failure or has failed.

25

-or-

System is old, cannot be easily cleaned, or is subject to contamination.

15

B. Storage system is inadequate for existing demands.

20

-or-

Storage system demand exceeds 90% of storage capacity.

10

C. Applicable contact time requirements cannot be met without an upgrade.

15

D. System suffers from low static pressures.

15

Total

75

Distribution

Deficiency Description

Points Available

Health Risk and Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)

A. Distribution system equipment is deteriorated or inadequate for existing demands.

20

-or-

Distribution system is inadequate to meet 5-year projected demands.

10

B. Applicable disinfectant residual maintenance requirements are not met or high backflow contamination potential exists.

20

C. Project will replace pipe containing

15

unsafe materials, such as lead or asbestos

D. Minimum dynamic pressure requirements are not met.

10

E. System experiences a heavy leak rate in the distribution lines.

10

Total

75

Emergencies

Upon the Board finding of an emergency as required by Section R309-705-9.

100

(2) Financial Assistance Determination. The amount and type of financial assistance offered will be based upon the criteria shown in Table 2. As determined by Board resolution, disadvantaged communities may also receive 0% loans, or other financial assistance as described in this rule.

Effective rate calculation methods will be determined by Board resolution from time to time, using the Revenue Bond Index RBI as a basis point, the points assigned in Table 2, and a method to reduce the interest rate from a recent rate down to a potential minimum of 0%.

TABLE 2

INTEREST, HARDSHIP GRANT FEE AND OTHER FEES REDUCTION FACTORS

1. COST EFFECTIVENESS RATIO, SELECT ONE

POINTS

Project Cost per benefitting connection

A. $0 to $500

16

B. $501 to $1,500

14

C. $1,501 to $2,000

11

D. $2,001 to $3,000

8

E. $3,001 to $5,000

4

F. $5,001 to $10,000

1

G. Over $10,000

0

2. CURRENT LOCAL MEDIAN ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME (MAGI), SELECT ONE

A. Less than 70% of State Median AGI

19

B. 71 to 80% of State Median AGI

16

C. 81 to 95% of State Median AGI

13

D. 96 to 110% of State Median AGI

9

E. 111 to 130% of State Median AGI

6

F. 131 to 150% of State Median AGI

3

G. Greater than 150% of State Median AGI

0

3. APPLICANT'S COMMITMENT TO PROJECT

PROJECT FUNDING CONTRIBUTED BY APPLICANT, SELECT ONE

A. Greater than 25% of project funds

17

B. 15 to 25% of project funds

14

C. 10 to 15% of project funds

11

D. 5 to 10% of project funds

8

E. 2 to 5% of project funds

4

F. Less than 2% of project funds

0

4. WATER BILL, INCLUDING TAXES, AFTER PROJECT IS BUILT RELATIVE TO LOCAL MEDIAN ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME, SELECT ONE

A. Greater than 2.50% of local median MAGI

16

B. 2.01 to 2.50% of local median MAGI

12

C. 1.51 to 2.00% of local median MAGI

8

D. 1.01 to 1.50% of local median MAGI

3

E. 0 to 1.00% of local median MAGI

0

5. SPECIAL INCENTIVES, SELECT ALL THAT APPLY: The Applicant has the following:

A. A replacement fund receiving annual deposits of about 5% of the system's annual drinking water (DW) budget and fund has already accumulated a minimum of 10% of said annual DW budget in this reserve fund.

5

B. In addition to item 5.A., accumulated an amount equal to at least 20% of its annual DW budget in its replacement fund.

5

C. Created or enhanced, or will create or enhance, a regionalization plan.

16

D. Implemented a rate structure encouraging conservation.

6

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS FOR FINANCIAL NEED

100

Notes

Utah Admin. Code R309-705-6
Amended by Utah State Bulletin Number 2023-11, effective 5/22/2023

State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.


No prior version found.