Utah Admin. Code R597-6-3 - Courtroom Observation
(1) Courtroom observations shall be conducted according to
the evaluation cycles described in Subsections R597-6-1(1) and
R597-6-1(2).
(2) Courtroom observers shall be volunteers, recruited by the
commission through public outreach and advertising.
(3) For courtroom observation, commission staff shall:
(a) notify each judge at the beginning of each survey cycle
of the courtroom observation process and of the observation instrument to be
used by the courtroom observers;
(b) select courtroom observers based on written applications
and an interview process; and
(c) track and report the method by which each observation was
conducted, as outlined in Subsection R597-6-3(8).
(4) Only the summary of the individual courtroom observation
reports shall be included in the retention report published publicly for each
judge.
(5) Individuals with a broad and varied range of life
experiences shall be sought to volunteer as courtroom observers, except that
the following individuals may be excluded from eligibility:
(a) individuals who currently have, or have previously had,
professional or personal involvement with the court system, or the
judge;
(b) individuals with a fiduciary relationship with the
judge;
(c) individuals within a third degree of relationship with a
state or justice court judge. This includes grandparents, parents or
parents-in-law, aunts or uncles, children, nieces and nephews and their
spouses;
(d) individuals lacking computer access or basic computer
literacy skills;
(e) individuals currently involved in litigation in state or
justice courts; or
(f) individuals whose background or experience suggests they
may have a bias that would prevent them from objectively serving in the
courtroom observation program.
(6) Courtroom observers shall:
(a) serve at the will of the commission staff;
(b) refrain from disclosing the content of their courtroom
evaluations in any form or to any person except as designated by the
commission;
(c) satisfactorily complete a courtroom observation training
program developed by the commission before engaging in courtroom
observation;
(d) conduct courtroom observations of in-court proceedings
for each judge they are assigned to observe, for a minimum of two hours;
and
(e) upon completion of the observation of a judge, complete
the observation instrument, which will be electronically transferred to
commission staff.
(7) Courtroom observations may be completed in one sitting or
over several courtroom calendars.
(8) Courtroom observations may be conducted using the
following methods, as necessary to complete the required number of observations
for a judge:
(a) in-person;
(b) by video, including web conferencing, live-streamed
video, and pre-recorded video;
(c) by audio recordings; or
(d) a combination of the methods.
(9) The commission shall develop a courtroom observation
training program that shall include:
(a) orientation and overview of commission processes and the
courtroom observation program;
(b) classroom training addressing each level of court;
(c) in-court group observations, with subsequent classroom
discussions, for each level of court;
(d) training on proper use of the observation
instrument;
(e) training on confidentiality and non-disclosure
issues;
(f) training on electronic access methods to conduct
observations;
(g) training on observation dynamics based on type of method;
and
(h) such other periodic trainings as are necessary for
effective observations.
(10) During each midterm and retention evaluation cycle, a
minimum of four different courtroom observers shall observe each judge subject
to that evaluation cycle.
(11) Courtroom observers may observe a judge sitting in more
than one geographic location or a justice court judge serving in more than one
jurisdiction, in any location or combination of locations in which the judge
holds court.
(12) Courtroom observers, though volunteers, may be eligible
to receive compensation in exchange for successful completion of a specified
amount of additional courtroom observation work.
(13) Courtroom observers shall evaluate the judicial behavior
observed in court as it relates to procedural fairness by responding in
narrative form to principles and behavioral standards which shall
include:
(a) neutrality, including the judge:
(i) displaying fairness and impartiality toward court
participants;
(ii) acting as a fair and principled decision maker who
applies rules consistently across court participants and cases;
(iii) explaining transparently and openly how rules are
applied and how decisions are reached; and
(iv) listening carefully and impartially;
(b) respect, including the judge:
(i) demonstrating courtesy toward attorneys, court staff, and
others in the court;
(ii) treating all people with dignity;
(iii) helping interested parties understand decisions and
what the parties must do as a result;
(iv) maintaining decorum in the courtroom;
(v) demonstrating adequate preparation to hear scheduled
cases;
(vi) acting for the parties, not out of demonstrated personal
prejudices;
(vii) managing caseflow efficiently and demonstrating
awareness of the effect of delay on court participants; and
(viii) demonstrating interest in the needs, problems, and
concerns of court participants;
(c) voice, including the judge:
(i) giving parties the opportunity, where appropriate, to
give voice to their perspectives or situations and demonstrating that they have
been heard;
(ii) behaving in a manner that demonstrates full
consideration of the case as presented through witnesses, arguments, pleadings,
and other documents; and
(iii) attending, where appropriate, to the participants'
comprehension of the proceedings;
(d) any other questions necessary to help the commission
assess the overall performance of the judge with respect to procedural
fairness.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.