Utah Admin. Code R64-6-6 - Criteria for Awarding Grants
(1)
Applications submitted during each funding cycle shall be evaluated and ranked
by the advisory board.
(2)
Previously determined ranking criteria will be followed for each funding
cycle.
(3) Applications that are
recommended for funding by the advisory board shall receive final approval from
the before contracting.
(4)
Pursuant to Subsection
4-18-108(2)(a), in
considering applications, the UCC shall consider the following criteria in
addition to any published ranking criteria:
(a) the ability of the grantee to pay for the
costs of proposed plans or projects;
(b) the availability of matching funds
provided by the grantee or another source or the availability of material,
labor, or other items in value provided in lieu of money by the grantee or
another source; and
(c) the
benefits that accrue to the general public by the awarding of a
grant.
(5) The AgVIP may
designate priority areas or application types based on specific water quality
concerns.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.