Wash. Admin. Code § 468-600-360 - Commission's authority to elect competitive negotiations
(1) In addition to the commission 's ability
to exercise any alternative process permitted under WAC
468-600-232, the commission may
authorize, at its option, competitive negotiations with more than a single
proposer as a means of selecting from among competing proposals submitted under
these rules.
Negotiations under this section are part of the
(2) The
commission may announce its election to conduct competitive negotiations:
(a) In any notice issued for solicited
proposals under WAC
468-600-105; or
(b) By written notice, by mail or by
electronic means, to the proposers, issued at any time following the state 's
receipt of proposals under WAC
468-600-220.
(3) In any communication under subsection (2)
of this section, or by notice to the proposers issued by mail or by electronic
means at any time after the receipt of proposals, the commission may announce
that it will initiate competitive negotiations with all proposers who submitted
responsive proposals, or only with proposers who qualify to negotiate because
the state has determined that their proposals fall within a competitive
range.
(4) When the commission
elects to negotiate only with proposers within a competitive range, then after
the evaluation panel's evaluation of proposals in accordance with the criteria
set forth in the notice or request for proposals, the commission will determine
the proposers in the competitive range.
(a)
For purposes of this subsection (4), the proposers in the competitive range
consist of those proposers whose proposals, as determined by the commission in
its discretion, have a reasonable chance of being determined the best proposal
as the result of the evaluations conducted by the evaluation panel under WAC
468-600-350. In determining which
proposals fall within the competitive range, the commission may consider
whether its preliminary evaluation of proposals establishes a natural break in
the preliminary scores of the proposals that suggests those proposals that are
sufficiently competitive to be included in the competitive range.
(b) The department will provide written
notice to all proposers, by mail or by electronic means, of the proposals the
commission determines to fall within the competitive range. A proposer whose
proposal is not within the competitive range may submit a written protest of
the commission 's evaluation and determination of the competitive range within
fourteen calendar days after the date of the department 's notice. A proposer 's
written protest must state facts and argument that demonstrate how the
competitive range determination was flawed or how the commission 's
determination constituted an abuse of discretion. If the department receives no
written protest concerning the proposed selection listing within the fourteen
calendar day period, then the department will proceed with negotiations with
the proposers whose proposals fell within the competitive range.
(c) In response to a timely filed protest,
the commission will issue a written decision that resolves the issues raised in
the protest. The commission will make its written determination available, by
mail or by electronic means, to the protesting proposer and to the proposers
falling within the competitive range.
(5) The object of competitive negotiations,
which the department may conduct concurrently with more than one proposer or
serially, is to maximize the state 's ability to obtain best value and to permit
proposers to develop revised proposals. Therefore, the negotiations may
include, but shall not be limited to:
(a)
Informing proposers of deficiencies in their proposals;
(b) Notifying proposers of parts of their
proposals for which the department would like additional information;
and
(c) Otherwise allowing
proposers to develop revised proposals that will permit the state to obtain the
best proposal based on the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in
the notice or request for proposals.
(6) The scope, manner and extent of
negotiations with any proposer are subject to the discretion of the department .
To prevent the disclosure of proposal information to a proposer 's competitors,
the department shall conduct negotiations with proposers before the nature of
the proposals, information about the proposed project, or proposal information
have been made public under WAC
468-600-600. In conducting
negotiations, the department :
(a) Shall treat
all proposers fairly and shall not engage in conduct that favors any proposer
over another;
(b) Shall not reveal
to another proposer a proposer 's unique technology, unique or innovative
approaches to project design, management or financing, or any information that
would compromise the proposer 's intellectual property, trade secrets or
sensitive business information; or
(c) Shall not reveal to another proposer a
proposer 's price or pricing information, provided, however, that the department
may inform a proposer that the department considers a proposer 's price or
pricing information to be too high or too low.
(7) The evaluation panel must further
evaluate the proposals subjected to the competitive negotiation process, and
recommendations to the commission for their action under WAC
468-600-355.
Notes
Statutory Authority: RCW 47.29.030. 07-04-095, § 468-600-360, filed 2/6/07, effective 3/9/07.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.