A prior section 124, added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 201(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 514; amended Pub. L. 98–525, title XIII, § 1301(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2611; Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, § 1303(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 738, related to establishment, composition, and functions of combatant commands, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–433, § 211(c)(1). See section 161 et seq. of this title. Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XI, § 1102, Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2042, which was set out as a note under section 113 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–189, § 1202(b).
1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–190 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Condition on Development of Forward Operating Locations for United States Southern Command Counter-Drug Detection and Monitoring Flights
Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, § 1024, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 748, provided that:
Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense
for any fiscal year may be obligated or expended for the purpose of improving the physical infrastructure at any proposed forward operating location outside the United States
from which the United States
Southern Command may conduct counter-drug detection and monitoring flights until a formal agreement regarding the extent and use of, and host nation support for, the forward operating location is executed by both the host nation and the United States.
Counter-Drug Detection and Monitoring Systems Plan
Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, § 1043, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2492, provided that:
“(a) Requirements of Detection and Monitoring Systems.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish requirements for counter-drug detection and monitoring systems to be used by the Department of Defense in the performance of its mission under section 124(a) of title 10, United States Code, as lead agency of the Federal Government for the detection and monitoring of the transit of illegal drugs into the United States. Such requirements shall be designed—
to minimize unnecessary redundancy between counter-drug detection and monitoring systems;
to grant priority to assets and technologies of the Department of Defense that are already in existence or that would require little additional development to be available for use in the performance of such mission;
to promote commonality and interoperability between counter-drug detection and monitoring systems in a cost-effective manner; and
to maximize the potential of using counter-drug detection and monitoring systems for other defense missions whenever practicable.
“(b) Evaluation of Systems.—The Secretary of Defense shall identify and evaluate existing and proposed counter-drug detection and monitoring systems in light of the requirements established under subsection (a). In carrying out such evaluation, the Secretary shall—
assess the capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses of counter-drug detection and monitoring systems; and
determine the optimal and most cost-effective combination of use of counter-drug detection and monitoring systems to carry out activities relating to the reconnaissance, detection, and monitoring of drug traffic.
“(c) Systems Plan.—
Based on the results of the evaluation under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall prepare a plan for the development, acquisition, and use of improved counter-drug detection and monitoring systems by the Armed Forces. In developing the plan, the Secretary shall also make every effort to determine which counter-drug detection and monitoring systems should be eliminated from the counter-drug program based on the results of such evaluation. The plan shall include an estimate by the Secretary of the full cost to implement the plan, including the cost to develop, procure, operate, and maintain equipment used in counter-drug detection and monitoring activities performed under the plan and training and personnel costs associated with such activities.
Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 23, 1992], the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the requirements established under subsection (a) and the results of the evaluation conducted under subsection (b). The report shall include the plan prepared under subsection (c).
“(e) Limitation on Obligation of Funds.—
Except as provided in paragraph (2), none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1993 pursuant to an authorization of appropriations in this Act [see Tables for classification] may be obligated or expended for the procurement or upgrading of a counter-drug detection and monitoring system, for research and development with respect to such a system, or for the lease or rental of such a system until after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress the report required under subsection (d).
“(2) Paragraph (1) shall not prohibit obligations or expenditures of funds for—
any procurement, upgrading, research and development, or lease of a counter-drug detection and monitoring system that is necessary to carry out the evaluation required under subsection (b); or
the operation and maintenance of counter-drug detection and monitoring systems used by the Department of Defense as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
“(f) Definition.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘counter-drug detection and monitoring systems’ means land-, air-, and sea-based detection and monitoring systems suitable for use by the Department of Defense in the performance of its mission—
to provide support to law enforcement agencies in the detection, monitoring, and communication of the movement of traffic at, near, and outside the geographic boundaries of the United States
Integration of Communications Network
Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XII, § 1204(a), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1564, provided that:
The Secretary of Defense
shall integrate into an effective communications network the command, control, communications, and technical intelligence assets of the United States
that are dedicated (in whole or in part) to the interdiction of illegal drugs into the United States.
The Secretary shall carry out this subsection in consultation with the Director of National Drug Control Policy.”
Research and Development
Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XII, § 1205, Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1564, provided that:
“The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that adequate research and development activities of the Department of Defense, including research and development activities of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, are devoted to technologies designed to improve—
the ability of the Department to carry out the detection and monitoring function of the Department under section 124 of title 10
, United States
Code, as added by section 1202; and
the ability to detect illicit drugs and other dangerous and illegal substances that are concealed in containers.”
Training Exercises in Drug-Interdiction Areas
Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XII, § 1206, Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1564, provided that:
“(a) Exercises Required.—
The Secretary of Defense shall direct that the armed forces, to the maximum extent practicable, shall conduct military training exercises (including training exercises conducted by the reserve components) in drug-interdiction areas.
Not later than February 1 of 1991 and 1992, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the implementation of subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year.
“(2) The report shall include—
a description of the exercises conducted in drug-interdiction areas and the effectiveness of those exercises in the national counter-drug effort; and
a description of those additional actions that could be taken (and an assessment of the results of those actions) if additional funds were made available to the Department of Defense for additional military training exercises in drug-interdiction areas for the purpose of enhancing interdiction and deterrence of drug smuggling.
“(c) Drug-Interdiction Areas Defined.—
For purposes of this section, the term ‘drug-interdiction areas’ includes land and sea areas in which, as determined by the Secretary, the smuggling of drugs into the United States
occurs or is believed by the Secretary to have occurred.”