Quick search by citation:
10 U.S. Code Subchapter I - MANAGEMENT
prev | next
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2021—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, § 1701(f)(7), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2139, added item 4212 and struck out former item 4212 “Risk management and mitigation”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Should-Cost Management
Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, § 837, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1474, provided that:
“(a) Requirement for Regulations.—
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 12, 2017], the Secretary of Defense shall amend the Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to provide for the appropriate use of the should-cost review process of a major weapon system in a manner that is transparent, objective, and provides for the efficiency of the systems acquisition process in the Department of the Defense.
“(b) Required Elements.—The regulations required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following elements:
“(1)
A description of the features of the should-cost review process.
“(2)
Establishment of a process for communicating with the prime contractor on the program the elements of a proposed should-cost review.
“(3)
A method for ensuring that identified should-cost savings opportunities are based on accurate, complete, and current information and can be quantified and tracked.
“(4)
A description of the training, skills, and experience that Department of Defense and contractor officials carrying out a should-cost review in subsection (a) should possess.
“(5)
A method for ensuring appropriate collaboration with the contractor throughout the review process.
“(6)
Establishment of review process requirements that provide for sufficient analysis and minimize any impact on program schedule.”
Management of Manufacturing Risk in Major Defense Acquisition Programs
Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 812, Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4264, as amended by Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title VIII, § 834, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1506, directed the Secretary of Defense to issue, not later than 180 days after Jan. 7, 2011, comprehensive guidance on the management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs and to ensure that the acquisition workforce chapter of the annual strategic workforce plan required by former section 115b of this title included an assessment of the critical manufacturing readiness knowledge and skills needed in the acquisition workforce and a plan of action for addressing any gaps in such knowledge and skills.
Congressional Notification of Cancellation of Major Automated Information Systems
Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, § 806, Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3373, provided that:
“(a) Report Required.—
The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] not less than 60 days before cancelling a major automated information system program that has been fielded or approved to be fielded, or making a change that will significantly reduce the scope of such a program, of the proposed cancellation or change.
“(b) Content.—Each notification submitted under subsection (a) with respect to a proposed cancellation or change shall include—
“(1)
the specific justification for the proposed cancellation or change;
“(2)
a description of the impact of the proposed cancellation or change on the ability of the Department to achieve the objectives of the program proposed for cancellation or change;
“(3)
a description of the steps that the Department plans to take to achieve those objectives; and
“(4)
other information relevant to the change in acquisition strategy.
“(c) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1)
The term ‘major automated information system’ has the meaning given that term in Department of Defense directive 5000.1.
“(2)
The term ‘approved to be fielded’ means having received Milestone C approval.”