Skip to main content

APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Ass’n of America

Issues

Does the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s funding structure violate the Constitution’s Appropriations Clause because it draws money directly from the Federal Reserve’s proceeds, and, if so, should the Court vacate its Payday Lending Rule?

This case asks the Supreme Court to decide whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (“CFPB”) funding structure is constitutional under the Appropriations Clause. The CFPB argues that the text of the Appropriations Clause, in conjunction with its historical and modern understandings, supports its existing funding structure. Consumer Financial Services Association of America counters that the Appropriations Clause requires Congress to make a valid appropriation, and the current funding structure does not satisfy this requirement. The outcome of this case has serious implications for the regulation of financial markets and for consumers who borrow from financial institutions.

Questions as Framed for the Court by the Parties

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the statute providing funding to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 12 U.S.C. § 5497, violates the appropriations clause in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, and in vacating a regulation promulgated at a time when the Bureau was receiving such funding.

After the financial crisis of 2008, Congress enacted the Consumer Financial Protection Act which created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). 12 U.S.C. §§ 5481–5603.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Jed Stiglitz for his guidance and insights into this case.

Additional Resources

 

Submit for publication
0
Subscribe to APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE