violência doméstica e familiar

Article 132 of the Portuguese Penal Code imposes a more severe penalty (imprisonment from 12 to 25 years) for the crime of qualified homicide (“homicídio qualificado”), if, among other special circumstances, the victim is the current or former spouse or person with whom the perpetrator has a romantic relationship, regardless of sex and gender, if the victim is pregnant or if the crime is committed due to the victim’s gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity. 

Following a request to Brazil’s Federal Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal or “STF”) by then-President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the STF reviewed and upheld the constitutionality of the Lei Maria da Penha (“LMP”). The LMP is Brazil’s first law to address the problem of domestic violence against women on a national scale.

This case refers to a writ filed by the accused in order to not apply to his case Article 41 of Law 11.340/ 2006 (Maria da Penha Act). Article 41 states that the domestic crimes committed against women cannot be tried by the procedural rite of 9.099/1995 (Small Courts Act), which regulates the trial of petty offenses. The accused argued that his conduct did not fit into Article 41, and that applying this article would be unconstitutional for giving special treatment to women. The Supreme Court of Brazil denied the order and declared Article 41 constitutional.

Federal Law No. 11.340/2006 commonly known as “Lei Maria da Penha” (or Maria da Penha Act) creates a new body of legal provisions regarding domestic and familiar violence against women in Brazil and requires that public authorities develop policy and measures that aim to guarantee women's human rights within the scope of domestic and family relations. The law also addresses urgent protective measures for victims.

The law defines domestic and familiar violence against women as any action or inaction based on gender that results in death, injury, physical, sexual or psychological suffering, or moral or property damage within the domestic unit (space for the permanent conviviality of people, with or without family ties), within a family unit (individuals who are or consider themselves to be related, united by natural ties, affinity, or express will) or within any intimate relationship, regardless of cohabitation.

The law decrees that a judge shall determine, for a defined period of time, the inclusion of the woman in a situation of domestic and family violence in the registry of assistance programs of the federal, state and municipal government. (Article 9). Article 10-A sets guidelines on how the victim's assistance will be handled by the police authority and guarantees specialized police and forensic care to be provided by previously trained officers - preferably female.

The Maria da Penha Act alters the penal procedure code to allow the judge to order preventive custody when there is risk to the physical or psychological integrity of the woman. (Article 42). Article 45 alters the law of criminal enforcement to allow the judge to determine the obligatory attendance of the aggressor in recovery and re-education programs. The Act orders the creation of special courts for domestic and family violence against women with civil and penal competence to address family issues derived from violence against women.

The applicant brought this case to the Inter-American Commission (“IACHR”), arguing that Brazil effectively condoned violence against women through ineffective judicial and prosecutorial action. The applicant’s husband shot her in the back while she was sleeping. She survived, but was paralyzed from the waist down. Her husband received a sentence of two years in prison after 19 years of trial.

The defendant appealed from a lower court decision convicting him to 12 years of imprisonment for committing the crimes of domestic violence, child mistreatment and sexual abuse, and aggravated coercion. The defendant sought to reduce his sentence, arguing that the lower court erred in applying the law to the facts, since there was no evidence that his actions could be characterized as domestic violence.

The Public Prosecutor (Ministério Público) brought charges against the defendant  for sexual coercion and domestic violence against his spouse. The defendant was convicted by the lower court (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores) of a aggravated domestic violence, but acquitted of sexual coercion, because the court understood that the elements of domestic violence encompassed the elements of sexual coercion. The prosecutor filed an appeal, which was granted by the Court of Appeals of Lisbon.