Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 62-818.008 - Ranking and Selection of Applications
(1)
Evaluation Report. After a period for review, not to exceed 120 calendar days
from the Application deadline, the Trust staff shall prepare a written
evaluation report, based on information provided in the Application , to the
Governing Board . Staff shall also provide a copy of the evaluation report to
the Applicant prior to the Governing Board meeting provided for in subsection
62-818.008(2),
F.A.C.
(2) The Governing Board
shall meet for the purpose of ranking and selecting Applications for funding at
a publicly noticed meeting for this purpose.
(a) The Governing Board shall consider each
Application and the scores assigned in the Trust staff evaluation report. The
Board may modify staff recommended scores in order to settle unresolved issues
arising from written objections from Applicant (s) to scores received in the
evaluation report. Applicant objections to staff recommended scores must be
submitted in writing to the Trust staff no later than five full working days
prior to the Board ranking and selection meeting, in order to be considered.
Decisions to modify point totals shall be based on review of Applications by
the Governing Board , and public presentations to the Governing Board by Trust
staff, Applicants and other members of the general public.
(b) All proposed amendments to the Local
Comprehensive Plan that are included with the Application will be considered in
the staff evaluation. Proposed amendments cited in the Application must be
adopted by the Local Government and be effective pursuant to section
163.3189(2),
F.S., prior to the date of the Governing Board ranking and selection meeting in
order for points to be awarded in the final score.
(c) After approval of the score of each
Application , the Governing Board shall consider the scores, the requirements of
this rule chapter, and rank the Applications in descending order, with the
highest ranking Application being given highest funding priority.
(d) In the event of tied scores, the Trust
shall rank the Applications by:
1. Scores
received in the Community Planning Section set forth in subsection
62-818.007(3),
F.A.C. The Trust shall consider the point totals in this evaluation category,
and rank the tied Applications in descending order, with highest ranking score
in this section being given highest funding priority. In the event of further
tied scores, the Trust shall rank the Applications by the criteria specified by
subparagraph 2. of this subsection.
2. Scores received in the Outdoor Recreation
Section set forth in subsection
62-818.007(2),
F.A.C. The Trust shall consider the point totals in this evaluation category,
and rank the tied Applications in descending order, with highest ranking score
in this section being given highest funding priority. In the event of further
tied scores, the Trust shall rank the Applications by the criteria specified by
subparagraph 3. of this subsection.
3. Scores received in the General Standards
Section set forth in subsection
62-818.007(1),
F.A.C. The Trust shall consider the point totals in this evaluation category,
and rank the tied Applications in descending order, with highest ranking score
in this section being given highest funding priority order. In the event of
further tied scores, the Trust shall rank the Applications by the criteria
specified by subparagraph 4., of this subsection.
4. The order in which Applications were
received prior to the Application
deadline.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.