Utah Admin. Code R277-552-6 - Requests for a New Satellite School or Large Expansion
(1) An authorization process developed by an
authorizer in accordance with Subsection
R277-552-2(2)
shall comply with this Section
R277-552-6 for a satellite
school or large expansion request.
(2) An authorizer may not consider an
application for a satellite school from a charter school governed by a
different authorizer.
(3) An
authorizer may only approve an application from a charter school for a
satellite school or large expansion if:
(a)
the charter school is in compliance with the requirements of federal and state
law, regulations, and Board rule;
(b) the charter school meets the academic and
other standards and requirements of the charter school authorizer, and is in
good standing according to the standards established by the charter school's
authorizer in the authorizer's process for charter school expansion or
satellite school described in Subsection
R277-552-2(2),
including whether the charter LEA, as a whole, qualifies as high performing
under the charter school's authorizer's approved definition of high
performing;
(d) subject to
Subsection (4), the charter school is operationally successful, taking into
consideration at least two years of data for every school under the charter
agreement;
(e) the charter school
has plans for the new satellite school or large expansion to:
(i) provide educational services consistent
with state law and Board rule;
(ii)
administer and have capacity to carry out statewide assessments including
proctoring statewide assessments, consistent with Section
53E-4-303 and Rule R277-404;
and
(iii) provide evidence-based
instruction for special populations as required by federal law;
(f) the charter school has
adequate qualified administrators and staff to meet the needs of the proposed
student population at the new school;
(g) the school is in compliance with all
public school legal obligations;
(h) the charter school is in good standing
with its authorizer;
(i) the
charter school has no outstanding corrective action that has not yet been
resolved by the completion of a corrective action plan;
(j) the charter school provides a market
analysis, including documentation of the school's potential for enrollment
stability; and
(k) the charter
school provides any additional information or documentation requested by the
authorizer.
(4)
(a) For purposes of this Subsection (4),
"debt coverage ratio" means:
(i) a debt
coverage ratio calculated using (revenue -expenditures + interest cost +
depreciation) divided by annual debt service; or
(ii) if the charter school's facilities are
leased and not owned, a debt coverage ratio calculated using (revenue -
expenditures + facility lease payment + real property taxes + depreciation)
divided by annual debt service.
(b) A charter school is considered to be
operationally successful if:
(i) for each of
the schools under the charter agreement, the charter school meets the following
criteria:
(A) for a school with 350 or less
students enrolled in the school, at least 120% debt coverage ratio for each of
the three years before the request for a satellite;
(B) for a school with between 351 and 499
students enrolled in the school, at least 115% debt coverage ratio for each of
the three years before the request for a satellite;
(C) for a school with between 500 and 750
students enrolled in the school, at least 110% debt coverage ratio for each of
the three years before the request for a satellite; or
(D) for a school with more than 750 students
enrolled in the school, at least 105% debt coverage ratio for each of the three
years before the request for a satellite;
(ii) the charter school is financially
viable, as evidenced by the charter school's financial records, including the
charter school's:
(A) most recent annual
financial report (AFR);
(B) annual
program report (APR); and
(C)
audited financial statements;
(iii) the charter school has maintained a net
lease adjusted debt burden ratio of under 25% for each of the last three years;
and
(iv) the charter school's
financial statements report revenues in excess of expenditures for at least
three of the last four years;
(v)
the charter school is meeting the terms of its charter agreement;
(vi) the charter school has maintained for
each of the last three years:
(A) a
re-enrollment rate of at least 80%;
(B) a wait list of at least 40% of its annual
enrollment; or
(C) there is a
demonstrated demand for the proposed satellite or large expansion, taking into
consideration the market analysis required under Subsection (3)(j).
(5) An
authorizer may provide additional requirements for a charter school in addition
to the minimum requirements described in this Section
R277-552-6.
(6) An authorizer shall provide documentation
of an applicant school's eligibility for a satellite school or large expansion
under Subsection (3) to the Superintendent upon request.
(7) An authorizer shall:
(a) approve a proposed large expansion
request or satellite school before October 1 of the state fiscal year before
the school year that the proposed school intends to first serve
students;
(b) provide the total
number of students by grade that the expanded or satellite school is authorized
to enroll to the Superintendent on or before October 1 of the state fiscal year
before the school year that the proposed school intends to first serve
students; and
(c) ensure that a
proposed school that will receive School LAND Trust funds has a charter trust
land council and satisfies all requirements of Rule R277-477, including
transparency of information for parents.
(8) A charter school and all of the charter
school's satellite schools are a single LEA for purposes of public school
funding and reporting.
(9) If a
satellite charter school does not open within 36 months of approval, the
approval shall expire.
(10) If an
authorizer denies an application for a satellite school, the school may
immediately apply for a new charter in accordance with an authorizer's approved
processes.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.