Quick search by citation:

10 U.S. Code § 3791 - Management of intellectual property matters within the Department of Defense

prev | next
(a) Policy Required.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall develop policy on the acquisition or licensing of intellectual property—
(1)
to enable coordination and consistency across the military departments and the Department of Defense in strategies for acquiring or licensing intellectual property and communicating with industry;
(2)
to ensure that program managers are aware of the rights afforded the Federal Government and contractors in intellectual property and that program managers fully consider and use all available techniques and best practices for acquiring or licensing intellectual property early in the acquisition process; and
(3)
to encourage customized intellectual property strategies for each system based on, at a minimum, the unique characteristics of the system and its components, the product support strategy for the system, the organic industrial base strategy of the military department concerned, and the commercial market.
(b) Cadre of Intellectual Property Experts.—
For a provision requiring establishment of a cadre of personnel who are experts in intellectual property matters, see section 1707 of this title.
(c) Guidelines and Resources.—
(1) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall develop guidelines and resources on the acquisition or licensing of intellectual property, including—
(A)
intellectual property strategies and other mechanisms supporting the use of modular open system approaches (as defined in section 4401(b) of this title);
(B)
evaluation and negotiation of intellectual property licenses in competitive and non-competitive awards;
(C)
models and best practices for specially negotiated licenses, including specially negotiated licenses described in section 3774(c) of this title; and
(D) definitions, key terms, examples, and case studies that clarify differences between—
(i)
detailed manufacturing and process data;
(ii)
form, fit, and function data;
(iii)
data required for operations, maintenance, installation, and training;
(iv)
modular system interfaces (as defined in section 4401(b) of this title); and
(v)
technical data pertaining to an interface between an item or process and other items or processes necessary for the segregation of an item or process from, or the reintegration of that item or process (or a functionally equivalent item or process) with, other items or processes.
(2) Guidelines and resources limit.—
The guidelines and resources developed under paragraph (1) may not alter or affect any authority or duty under this section or section 1707 of this title.
(3) Review and consultation.—In developing the guidelines and resources described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
review the applicable statutory and regulatory history, including among the definitions and key terms in section 3771 of this title, to ensure consistency; and
(B)
regularly consult with appropriate government and industry persons and organizations.
(4) Training.—
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the acquisition workforce receives training on the guidelines and resources developed under paragraph (1).
Editorial Notes
Codification

The text of subsec. (a) of section 2322 of this title, which was transferred to this section by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1833(o)(1), was based on Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, § 802(a)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1450.

Prior Provisions

Prior sections 3791 and 3792 were repealed by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, § 213, title VII, § 701, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2885, 2955, effective Sept. 15, 1981.

Section 3791, added Pub. L. 86–616, § 3(a), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 388, authorized Secretary of the Army to convene at any time a board of general officers to review record of any commissioned officer on active list of Regular Army to determine whether he should be required, because of moral dereliction, professional dereliction, or because his retention is not clearly consistent with interests of national security, to show cause for his retention on active list. See section 1181(b) of this title.

Section 3792, added Pub. L. 86–616, § 3(a), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 388, provided for boards of inquiry, composed of three or more general officers, to be convened at such places as Secretary of the Army prescribes, to receive evidence and make findings and recommendations whether an officer, required to show cause under section 3791 of this title, should be retained on active list of Regular Army. See section 1182 of this title.

Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263, § 841(1), substituted “Department of Defense” for “department of defense” in section catchline.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–263, § 841(2), added subsec. (c).

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, § 1701(b)(12)(A), which directed amendment of section 1833(n) of Pub. L. 116–283, which enacted this section, by substituting “DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE” for “DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE” in text of section catchline, could not be executed.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1833(o)(1), transferred subsec. (a) of section 2322 of this title to this section.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.