A. General
design requirements. An applicant shall ensure that the person designing an
on-site wastewater treatment facility:
1.
Signs the design documents submitted as part of the Notice of Intent to
Discharge to obtain a Construction Authorization, including plans,
specifications, drawings, reports, and calculations; and
2. Locates and designs the on-site wastewater
treatment facility project using good design judgment and relies on appropriate
design methods and calculations.
B. Design considerations and flow
determination. An applicant shall ensure that the person designing the on-site
wastewater treatment facility shall:
1.
Design the facility to satisfy a 20-year operational life;
2. Design the facility based on the
provisions of one or more of the general permits in
R18-9-E302 through
R18-9-E322 for facilities with a
design flow of less than 3000 gallons per day, and
R18-9-E323 for facilities with a
design flow of 3000 gallons per day to less than 24,000 gallons per
day;
3. Design the facility based
on the facility's design flow and wastewater characteristics as specified in
R18-9-A309(A)(7), (10) and
(11) and
R18-9-A309(B)(3);
4. For on-site wastewater treatment
facilities permitted under
R18-9-E303 through
R18-9-E323, apply the following
design requirements, as applicable:
a. Include
the power source and power components in construction drawings if electricity
or another type of power is necessary for facility operation;
b. If a hydraulic analysis is required under
subsection (E), perform the analysis based on the location and dimensions of
the bottom and sidewall surfaces of the disposal works that are identified in
the design documentation;
c. Design
components, piping, ports, seals, and appurtenances to withstand installation
loads, internal and external operational loads, and buoyant forces. Design
ports for resistance against movement, and cap or cover openings for protection
from damage and entry by rodents, mosquitoes, flies, or other organisms capable
of transporting a disease-causing organism;
d. Design tanks, liners, ports, seals, piping
to and within the facility, and appurtenances for water tightness under all
operational conditions;
e. Provide
adequate storage capacity above high operating level to:
i. Accommodate a 24-hour power or pump
outage, and
ii. Contain wastewater
that is incompletely treated or cannot be released by the disposal works to the
native soil;
f. If a
fixed media process is used, provide in the construction drawings the media
material, installation specification, media configuration, and wastewater
loading rate of the media at the daily design flow;
g. Provide a fail-safe wastewater control or
operational process, if required by the general permit to prevent discharge of
inadequately treated wastewater; and
h. Reference design. If using a reference
design on file with the Department, indicate the reference design within the
information submitted with the Notice of Intent to Discharge.
C. Setbacks.
The following setbacks apply unless the Department:
1. Specifies alternative setbacks under
Article 3, Part E of this Chapter;
2. Approves a different setback under the
procedure specified in subsection (G); or
3. Establishes a more stringent setback on a
site- or area-specific basis to ensure compliance with water quality standards.
|
Features Requiring
Setbacks
|
Setback For An On-Site
Wastewater Treatment Facility, Including Reserve Area (In Feet)
|
Special
Provisions
|
|
1. Building
|
10
|
Includes porches, decks (including pool decks), and
steps (covered or uncovered), breezeways, roofed patios, carports, covered
walks, and similar structures and appurtenances.
|
|
2. Property line shared with any adjoining lot or
parcel not served by a common drinking water system* or an existing water
well
|
50
|
A person may reduce the setback to a minimum of 5
feet from the property line if:
a. The owners of any affected undeveloped adjacent
properties agree, as evidenced by an appropriately recorded document, to limit
the location of any new well on their property to at least 100 feet from the
proposed treatment works and primary and reserve disposal works; and
b. The arrangements and documentation are approved
by the Department.
|
|
3. All other property lines
|
5
|
None
|
|
4. Public or private water supply well
|
100
|
None
|
|
5. Perennial or intermittent stream
|
100
|
Measured horizontally from the high water line of
the peak streamflow from a 10-year, 24hour rainfall event.
|
|
6. Lake, reservoir, or canal
|
100
|
Measured horizontally from the high water line from
a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event at the lake or reservoir and measured
horizontally from the edge of the canal.
|
|
7. Drinking water intake from a surface water
source (includes an open water body, downslope spring or a well tapping
stream-side saturated alluvium)
|
200
|
Measured horizontally from the on-site waste-water
treatment facility to the structure or mechanism for withdrawing raw water such
as a pipe inlet, grate, pump, intake or diversion box, spring box, well, or
similar structure.
|
|
8. Wash or drainage easement with a drainage area
of more than 20 acres
|
50
|
Measured horizontally from the nearest edge of the
defined natural channel bank or drainage easement boundary. A person may reduce
the setback to 25 feet if natural or constructed erosion protection is approved
by the appropriate flood plain administrator.
|
|
9. Water main or branch water line
|
10
|
None
|
|
10. Domestic service water line (including domestic
water holding tanks)
|
5
|
Measured horizontally between the water line and
the wastewater pipe, except that the following are allowed:
a. A water line may cross above a wastewater pipe
if the crossing angle is between 45 and 90 degrees and the vertical separation
distance is 1 foot or more.
b. A water line may parallel a wastewater pipe with
a horizontal separation distance of 1 foot to 5 feet if the bottom of the water
line is 1 foot or more above the top of the wastewater pipe and is in a
separate trench or on a bench in the same trench.
|
|
11. Downslopes or cut banks greater than 15
percent, culverts, and ditches from:
a. Treatment works components
b. Trench, bed, chamber technology, or gravelless
trench with:
i. No limiting subsurface condition specified in
R18-9-A310(D)(2)
,
ii. A limiting subsurface condition.
c. Subsurface drip lines.
|
10
20
50
3
|
Measured horizontally from the bottom of the
treatment works component to the closest point of daylighting on the
surface.
Measured horizontally from the bottom of the lowest
point of the disposal pipe or drip lines, as applicable, to the closest point
of daylighting on the surface.
Measured horizontally from the bottom of the lowest
point of the disposal pipe or drip lines, as applicable, to the closest point
of daylighting on the surface.
|
|
12. Driveway
|
5
|
Measured horizontally to the nearest edge of an
on-site wastewater treatment facility excavation. A person may place a properly
reinforced and protected wastewater treatment facility, except for disposal
works, at any location relative to a driveway if access openings, risers, and
covers carry the design load and are protected from inflow.
|
|
13. Swimming pool excavation
|
5
|
Except if soil loading or stability concerns
indicate the need for a greater separation distance.
|
|
14. Easement (except drainage easement)
|
5
|
None
|
|
15. Earth fissures
|
100
|
None
|
|
* A "common drinking water system" means a system
that currently serves or is under legal obligation to serve the property and
may include a drinking water utility, a well-sharing agreement, or other viable
water supply agreement.
|
D. Soil absorption rate (SAR) and disposal
works sizing.
1. An applicant shall determine
the soil absorption area by dividing the design flow by the applicable soil
absorption rate. If soil characterization and percolation test methods yield
different SAR values or if multiple applications of the same approach yield
different values, the designer of the disposal works shall use the lowest SAR
value unless a higher SAR value is proposed and justified to the Department's
satisfaction in the Notice of Intent to Discharge.
2. The SAR used to calculate disposal works
size for systems described in
R18-9-E302 is as follows:
a. The SAR by percolation testing as
described in
R18-9-A310(F) or
(G), as applicable, is determined as follows:
|
Percolation Rate from
Percolation Test (minutes per inch)
|
SAR, Trench, Chamber, and Pit
(gal/day/ft2)
|
SAR, Bed
(gal/day/ft2)
|
|
Less than 1.00
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
|
1.00 to less than 3.00
|
1.20
|
0.93
|
|
3.00
|
1.10
|
0.73
|
|
4.00
|
1.00
|
0.67
|
|
5.00
|
0.90
|
0.60
|
|
7.00
|
0.75
|
0.50
|
|
10.0
|
0.63
|
0.42
|
|
15.0
|
0.50
|
0.33
|
|
20.0
|
0.44
|
0.29
|
|
25.0
|
0.40
|
0.27
|
|
30.0
|
0.36
|
0.24
|
|
35.0
|
0.33
|
0.22
|
|
40.0
|
0.31
|
0.21
|
|
45.0
|
0.29
|
0.20
|
|
50.0
|
0.28
|
0.19
|
|
55.0
|
0.27
|
0.18
|
|
55.0+ to 60.0
|
0.25
|
0.17
|
|
60.0+ to 120
|
0.20
|
0.13
|
|
Greater than 120
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
b.
The SAR using the soil evaluation method described in
R18-9-A310(E) is
determined by answering the questions in the following table. The questions are
read in sequence starting with "A." The first "yes" answer determines the SAR.
A seepage pit is required to determine percolation rate under the procedure
described in
R18-9-A310(G) and
would only use this table to augment the percolation test results, if
appropriate.
|
Sequence of Soil
Characteristics Questions
|
SAR, Trench, Chamber, and Pit
gal/day/ft2
|
SAR, Bed
gal/day/ft2
|
|
A. Is the horizon gravelly coarse sand or
coarser?
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
|
B. Is the structure of the horizon moderate or
strongly platy?
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
|
C. Is the texture of the horizon sandy clay loam,
clay loam, silty clay loam, or finer and the soil structure weak platy?
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
|
D. Is the moist consistence stronger than firm or
any cemented class?
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
|
E. Is the texture sandy clay, clay, or silty clay
of high clay content and the structure massive or weak?
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
|
F. Is the texture sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty
clay loam, or silt loam and the structure massive?
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
|
G. Is the texture of the horizon loam or sandy loam
and the structure massive?
|
0.20
|
0.13
|
|
H. Is the texture sandy clay, clay, or silty clay
of low clay content and the structure moderate or strong?
|
0.20
|
0.13
|
|
I. Is the texture sandy clay loam, clay loam, or
silty clay loam and the structure weak?
|
0.20
|
0.13
|
|
J. Is the texture sandy clay loam, clay loam, or
silty clay loam and the structure moderate or strong?
|
0.40
|
0.27
|
|
K. Is the texture sandy loam, loam, or silty loam
and the structure weak?
|
0.40
|
0.27
|
|
L. Is the texture sandy loam, loam, or silt loam
and the structure moderate or strong?
|
0.60
|
0.40
|
|
M. Is the texture fine sand, very fine sand, loamy
fine sand, or loamy very fine sand?
|
0.40
|
0.27
|
|
N. Is the texture loamy sand or sand?
|
0.80
|
0.53
|
|
O. Is the texture coarse sand?
|
1.20
|
A site-specific SAR is required
|
c.
If the percolation rate determined under
R18-9-A310(F) or
(G), whichever is applicable, is a value that
lies between two consecutive percolation rate values listed in subsection
(2)(a) above, the applicant must use the higher of the two listed percolation
rates to obtain the most conservative SAR.
3. For an on-site wastewater treatment
facility described in a general permit other than
R18-9-E302, the SAR is dependent
on the ability of the facility to reduce the level of TSS and
BOD
5 and is calculated using the following formula:
Click
here to view
a.
"SARa" is the adjusted soil absorption rate for disposal
works design in gallons per day per square foot,
b. "TSS" is the total suspended solids in
wastewater delivered to the disposal works in milligrams per liter,
c. "BOD5" is the
five-day biochemical oxygen demand of wastewater delivered to the disposal
works in milligrams per liter, and
d. "SAR" is the soil absorption rate for
septic tank effluent determined by the subsurface characterization method
described in
R18-9-A310.
4. An applicant shall ensure that the
facility is designed so that the area of the intended installation is large
enough to allow for construction of the facility and for future replacement or
repair and is at least as large as the following:
a. For a dwelling, a primary area for the
disposal works sized according to subsection (D)(1) and a reserve area of 100
percent of the primary area, excluding the footprint of the treatment works. A
reserve area is not required for a lot in a subdivision approved before 1974 if
the lot conforms to its original approved configuration;
b. For other than a dwelling, a primary area
for the disposal works sized according to subsection (D)(1) and a reserve area
of 100 percent of the primary area, excluding the footprint of the treatment
works.
5. An applicant
shall ensure that the subsurface disposal works is designed to achieve the
design flow established in
R18-9-A309(B)(3)
through proper hydraulic function, including conditions of seasonally cold and
wet weather.
E. Vertical
separation distances.
1. Minimum vertical
separation to the seasonal high water table for a disposal works described in
R18-9-E302 receiving septic tank
effluent. For a disposal works described in
R18-9-E302 receiving septic tank
effluent at a facility where the septic tank and disposal system described in
R18-9-E302 is the sole method of
treatment and disposal of wastewater, the minimum vertical separation distance
between the lowest point in the disposal works and the seasonal high water
table is dependent on the soil absorption rate and is determined as follows:
|
Soil Absorption Rate (gallons
per day per square foot)
|
Minimum Vertical Separation
Between The Bottom Of The Disposal Works And The Seasonal High Water Table
(feet)
|
|
Trench and Chamber
|
Bed
|
Seepage Pit
|
Trench, Chamber, and Bed
|
Seepage Pit
|
|
1.20+
|
0.93+
|
1.20+
|
Not allowed for septic tank effluent
|
Not Allowed
|
|
0.63+ to 1.20
|
0.42 to 0.93
|
0.63+ to 1.20
|
10
|
60
|
|
0.20 to 0.63
|
0.13 to 0.42
|
0.36 to 0.63
|
5
|
60
|
|
Less than 0.20
|
Less than 0.13
|
Less than 0.36
|
Not allowed for septic tank effluent
|
Not Allowed
|
2.
Minimum vertical separation to the seasonal high water table for treatment and
disposal works technologies described in
R18-9-E303 through
R18-9-E322 . If the minimum
vertical separation distance to the seasonal high water table for a disposal
works receiving septic tank effluent specified in subsection (E)(1) is not met,
the applicant shall comply with the following:
a. Employ one or more technologies described
in
R18-9-E303 through
R18-9-E322 to achieve a reduced
concentration of harmful microorganisms, expressed as total coliform in colony
forming units per 100 milliliters (cfu/100 ml) delivered to native soil at the
bottom of the disposal works. The applicant shall use the following table to
select works that achieve a reduced total coliform concentration corresponding
to the available vertical separation distance between the bottom of the
disposal works and the seasonal high water table:
|
Available Vertical Separation
Distance Between the Bottom of The Disposal Works and the Seasonal High Water
Table (feet)
|
Maximum Allowable Total
Coliform Concentration, 95th Percentile, Delivered
to Natural Soil by the Disposal Works (Log10 of coliform
concentration in cfu per 100 milliliters)
|
|
For SAR*, 0.20 to 0.63
|
For SAR*, 0.63+ to 1.20
|
|
5
|
10
|
8**
|
|
4
|
8
|
7
|
|
3.5
|
7
|
6
|
|
3
|
6
|
5
|
|
2.5
|
5
|
4
|
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
|
1.5
|
3
|
2
|
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|
0
|
0
|
0***
|
* Soil absorption rate from percolation testing or soil
characterization, in gallons per square foot per day.
** Nominal value for a standard septic tank and disposal
field (108 colony forming units per 100 ml).
*** Nominally free of coliform bacteria.
b. Include a hydraulic analysis with the
Notice of Intent to Discharge, based on the dimensions of the absorption
surfaces specified in
R18-9-A312(B)(4)(b),
showing that the soil is sufficiently permeable to conduct wastewater downward
and laterally without surfacing for the site conditions at the disposal works.
3. Vertical separation
from a subsurface limiting condition described in
R18-9-A310(D)(2)(d)
that may cause or contribute to surfacing of
wastewater. If a subsurface limiting condition described in
R18-9-A310(D)(2)(d)
exists at the location of the disposal
works, the applicant shall ensure that the design for the on-site wastewater
treatment facility meets one of the following:
a. A zone of acceptable native soil with the
following characteristics exists between the bottom of the disposal works and
the top of the subsurface limiting condition:
i. The zone of soil is at least 4 feet thick,
and
ii. The zone of soil is
sufficiently permeable to conduct wastewater released from the disposal works
vertically downward and laterally without causing surfacing of the wastewater
as documented by a hydraulic analysis submitted with the Notice of Intent to
Discharge that is based on the dimensions of the absorption surfaces specified
in
R18-9-A312(B)(4)(b);
b. The subsurface limiting condition is thin
enough to allow placement of a disposal works into acceptable native soil
beneath the subsurface limiting condition if the following criteria are met:
i. The bottom of the subsurface limiting
condition is not deeper than 10 feet below the land surface, and
ii. The vertical separation distance from the
bottom of the disposal works to the seasonal high water table complies with
subsection (E)(1) or (2), as applicable; or
c. If the disposal works is placed above the
subsurface limiting condition and the depth to the subsurface limiting
condition is less than 4 feet below the bottom of the disposal works, the
design for the on-site wastewater treatment facility shall comply with all of
the following:
i. Employ one or more
technologies described in
R18-9-E303 through
R18-9-E322 to achieve a reduced
concentration of harmful microorganisms, expressed as total coliform in colony
forming units per 100 milliliters (cfu/100 ml), delivered to acceptable native
soil at the bottom of the disposal works, as follows:
|
Available Vertical Separation
Distance from the Bottom of the Disposal Works to the Subsurface Limiting
Condition (feet)
|
Maximum Allowable Total
Coliform Concentration, 95th Percentile, Delivered
to Acceptable Native Soil by the Disposal Works (Log10
of coliform concentration in cfu per 100 milliliters)
|
|
3.5
|
7
|
|
3
|
6
|
|
2.5
|
5
|
|
2
|
4
|
|
1.5
|
0*
|
|
1
|
0*
|
|
0.5
|
0*
|
|
0
|
0*
|
* Nominally free of coliform bacteria.
ii. Include a hydraulic analysis with the
Notice of Intent to Discharge, based on the location and dimensions of the
absorption surfaces specified in
R18-9-A312(B)(4)(b),
showing that the soil is sufficiently permeable to conduct wastewater
vertically downward and laterally without surfacing for the site conditions at
the disposal works; and
iii. If a
disinfection device under
R18-9-E320 is proposed but is not
used with surface disposal of wastewater under
R18-9-E321 or "Category A" drip
irrigation disposal under
R18-9-E322, provide a
justification with the Notice of Intent to Discharge stating why the selected
type of disposal works is favored over disposal under
R18-9-E321 or
R18-9-E322.
4. Vertical separation from a subsurface
limiting condition described in
R18-9-A310(D)(2)(e)
that promotes accelerated downward movement
of insufficiently treated wastewater. If a subsurface limiting condition
described in
R18-9-A310(D)(2)(e)
exists at the location of the proposed
disposal works, the applicant shall ensure that the design for the on-site
wastewater treatment facility meets one of the following:
a. A zone of naturally occurring soil with
the following characteristics exists between the bottom of the disposal works
and the top of the subsurface limiting condition:
i. The zone of soil is at least 2 feet thick,
and
ii. The SAR of the soil is not
less than 0.20 gallons per day per square foot nor more than 1.20 gallons per
day per square foot; or
b. The on-site wastewater treatment facility
employs one or more technologies described in
R18-9-E303 through
R18-9-E322 that produces treated
wastewater that meets a total coliform concentration of 1,000,000
(Log
106) colony forming units per 100 milliliters,
95
th percentile.
F. Materials and manufactured system
components.
1. Materials. An applicant shall
use aggregate if no specification for disposal works material is provided in
this Article.
2. Manufactured
components. If manufactured components are used, an applicant shall design,
install, and operate the on-site wastewater treatment facility following the
manufacturer's specifications. The applicant shall ensure that:
a. Treatment and containment components,
mechanical equipment, instrumentation, and controls have monitoring,
inspection, access and cleanout ports or covers, as appropriate, for monitoring
and service;
b. Treatment and
containment components, pipe, fittings, pumps, and related components and
controls are durable, watertight, structurally sound, and capable of
withstanding stress from installation and operational service; and
c. Distribution lines for disposal works are
constructed of perforated high density polyethylene pipe, perforated ABS pipe,
perforated PVC pipe, or other pipe material, if the pipe is suitable for
wastewater disposal use and sufficient openings are available for distribution
of the wastewater into the trench or bed area.
3. Electronic components. When electronic
components are used, the applicant shall ensure that:
a. The component connections are compliant
with the electrical code encompassed in the local building codes applicable in
the county in which the facility is installed, except as required for a
pressure distribution system under
R18-9-E304(D)(2)(e);
a.b.
Instructions and a wiring diagram are mounted on the inside of a control panel
cover;
b.c. The control panel is
equipped with a multimode operation switch, red alarm light, buzzer, and reset
button;
c.d. The multimode
operation switch operates in the automatic position for normal system
operation; and
d.e. An anomalous
condition is indicated by a glowing alarm light and sounding buzzer. The
continued glowing of the alarm light after pressing the reset button shall
signal the need for maintenance or repair of the system at the earliest
practical opportunity.
4.
If a conflict exists between this Article and the manufacturer's
specifications, the requirements of this Article apply. Except for the
requirements in subsection (D) and (E), which always apply, if the conflict
voids a manufacturer's warranty, the applicant may submit a request under
subsection (G) justifying use of the manufacturer's
specifications.
G.
Alternative design, setback, installation, or operational features. When an
applicant submits a Notice of Intent to Discharge, the applicant may request
that the Department review and approve a feature of improved or alternative
technology, design, setback, installation, or operation that differs from a
general permit requirement in this Article. Designs incorporating alternative
features already approved in a current listing on the "proprietary and other
reviewed product list" pursuant to
R18-9-A309(E) do
not need additional approval under this subsection for only those specific
alternative features already approved in the proprietary products listing.
1. The applicant shall make the request for
an improved or alternative feature of technology, design, setback,
installation, or operation on a form provided by the Department and include:
a. A description of the requested
change;
b. A citation to the
applicable feature or technology, design, setback, installation, or operational
requirement for which the change is being requested; and
c. Justification for the requested change,
including any necessary supporting documentation.
2. The applicant shall submit the appropriate
fee specified under 18 A.A.C.
14 for each requested change. For purposes of
calculating the fee, a requested change that is applied multiple times in a
similar manner throughout the facility is considered a single request if
submitted for concurrent review.
3.
The applicant shall provide sufficient information for the Department to
determine that the change achieves equal or better performance compared with
the general permit requirement, or addresses site or system conditions more
satisfactorily than the requirements of this Article.
4. The Department shall review and may
approve the request for change.
5.
The Department shall deny the request for the change if the change will
adversely affect other permittees or cause or contribute to a violation of an
Aquifer Water Quality Standard.
6.
The Department shall deny the request for the change if the change:
a. Fails to achieve equal or better
performance compared to the general permit requirement;
b. Fails to address site or system conditions
more satisfactorily than the general permit requirement;
c. Is insufficiently justified based on the
information provided in the submittal;
d. Requires excessive review time, research,
or specialized expertise by the Department to act on the request; or
e. For any other justifiable cause.
7. The Department may approve a
reduced setback for a facility authorized to discharge under one or more of the
general permits in
R18-9-E302 through
R18-9-E323, either separately or
in combination, if the applicant additionally demonstrates at least one of the
following:
a. The treatment performance is
significantly better than that provided under
R18-9-E302(B)
,
b. The wastewater loading rate is
reduced, or
c. Surface or
subsurface characteristics ensure that reduced setbacks are protective of human
health or water quality.
Notes
Ariz. Admin.
Code §
R18-9-A312
New Section adopted by
final rulemaking at 7 A.A.R. 235, effective January 1, 2001 (Supp. 00-4).
Amended to correct a manifest typographical error in subsection (E)(1) (Supp.
01-1). Amended by final rulemaking at 11 A.A.R. 4544, effective November 12,
2005 (05-3). Amended by final rulemaking at
29
A.A.R. 1023, effective
6/19/2023.