(2)
Waterbody segments shall be removed from the State's Verified List only after
adoption of a TMDL, a Department determination that pollution control programs
provide reasonable assurance that water quality standards will be attained
pursuant to Rule
62-303.600 F.A.C., or upon a
demonstration that the waterbody meets the waterbody quality standard that was
previously established as not being met.
(a)
For waters listed due to failure to meet aquatic life use support based on
water quality criteria or due to threats to human health based on single sample
water quality criteria, the water shall be delisted when:
1. The number of samples that do not meet an
applicable water quality criterion due to pollutant discharges is less than or
equal to the number listed in Table 4 for the given sample size, with a minimum
sample size of 30. Waters shall be delisted when 10% or less of the samples do
not meet the applicable criterion with a minimum of a 90% confidence level
using a binomial distribution, or
2. Following implementation of pollution
control activities that are expected to be sufficient to result in attainment
of applicable water quality standards, evaluation of new data indicates the
water no longer meets the criteria for listing established in Rule
62-303.420, F.A.C., or
3. Following demonstration that the water was
inappropriately listed due to flaws in the original analysis, evaluation of
available data indicates the water does not meet the criteria for listing
established in Rule
62-303.420,
F.A.C.
(b) New data
evaluated under subparagraph
62-303.720(2)(a)
1., F.A.C., must meet the following requirements:
1. They must include samples collected during
similar conditions (same seasons and general flow conditions) that the data
previously used to determine impairment were collected, with no more than 50%
of the samples collected in any one quarter,
2. The sample size must be a minimum of 30
samples; and,
(c) For waters listed due to failure to meet
aquatic life use support based on biological data pursuant to Rule
62-303.430, F.A.C., the
waterbody shall be delisted when two temporally independent follow-up
Biological Health Assessments have been conducted and the waterbody no longer
qualifies for the Planning List pursuant to subsection
62-303.330(3),
F.A.C. The follow-up tests must meet the following requirements:
1. For streams, the new data must be SCIs
unless the SCI is not appropriate for the waterbody type, in which case the new
data shall consist of the Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index.
(d) For waters listed due to fish consumption
advisories, the water shall be delisted following the lifting of the advisory
or when data complying with paragraphs
62-303.470(1)(a) and
(b), F.A.C., demonstrate that the
continuation of the advisory is no longer appropriate.
(e) For waters listed due to their shellfish
bed management classification, the water shall be delisted upon
reclassification of the shellfish harvesting area to approved, or for
conditionally approved areas, when the only source identified by SEAS for the
harvesting area is wildlife.
(f)
For waters listed due to bathing area closure or advisory data, the water shall
be delisted if the bathing area does not meet the listing thresholds in
subsection
62-303.360(1),
F.A.C., for five consecutive years.
(g) For waters listed based on impacts to
potable water supplies or treated potable water supplies, pursuant to paragraph
62-303.380(1)(b),
F.A.C., the water shall be delisted when the causes resulting in higher
treatment costs have been ameliorated.
(h) For waters listed based on
bacteriological water quality criteria expressed as a monthly geometric mean or
a median pursuant to paragraph
62-303.460(3)(b),
62-303.470(3)(b),
or
62-303.480(3)(b),
F.A.C., the water shall be delisted when:
1.
For listings based on bacteriological water quality criteria expressed as a
monthly geometric mean, the criteria applicable to those sections are met for
three consecutive years and there are sufficient new data available to
calculate monthly values for at least the same seasons in which the exceedances
occurred,
2. For listings based on
bacteriological water quality criteria expressed as a median, the criteria
applicable to those sections are met for the verified period, or
3. Following a demonstration that the water
was inappropriately listed due to flaws in the original analysis, including the
use of a non-representative sample set.
(j) For waters listed based
on a human health-based annual average criterion, the water shall be delisted
when the annual average concentration is less than the criterion for three
consecutive years.
(k) For waters
listed based on nutrient impairment, the waterbody shall be delisted if:
1. It was listed based on exceedances of a
nutrient threshold in subsection
62-303.450(1),
F.A.C., but it does not meet the listing thresholds in subsection
62-303.450(1),
F.A.C., for three consecutive years,
2. It was listed based on exceedances of a
numeric nutrient criterion expressed as an annual geometric mean or annual
mean, and the water attains the criterion for three consecutive
years,
3. It was listed based on
other information indicating an imbalance in flora or fauna pursuant to
subsection
62-303.450(2),
F.A.C., and it is demonstrated to not exceed the narrative nutrient criteria at
paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., pursuant to the provisions of subsection
62-303.450(2),
F.A.C.,
4. It was listed based on
exceedances of a numeric nutrient criterion expressed as a long-term average or
long-term average of annual means, and the long-term average over the verified
period no longer exceeds the criterion,
5. It was listed based on exceedances of a
numeric nutrient criterion expressed as not to be exceeded in more than 10
percent of the measurements, and the water meets the delisting requirements of
subparagraph
62-303.720(2)(a)
1., F.A.C.,
6. It was listed based
on exceedance of a loading based numeric nutrient criterion and the water
attains the criterion for three consecutive years, or
7. It was listed based on an increasing trend
in chlorophyll a and based on additional data and analysis the
trend is no longer statistically significant or the water is no longer expected
to become impaired within 5 years.
(l) For any listed water, the water shall be
delisted if, following a change in approved analytical procedures, criteria, or
water quality standards, evaluation of available data indicates the water no
longer meets the applicable criteria for listing.
(m) For waters listed due to failure to meet
aquatic life use support based on paragraph
62-303.420(7)(b),
F.A.C., or due to failure to meet fish consumption use support based on
subsection
62-303.470(2),
F.A.C., the waterbody shall be delisted if the Department determines the
waterbody is no longer impaired, based on scientifically credible and
compelling information comparable in quantity and quality to the information
used to make the initial listing decision. Any determinations to delist waters
based on this provision shall be documented, and the documentation shall
include the basis for the decision.
|
Table 4.
Delisting
|
|
Maximum number of samples that
do not meet an applicable water quality criterion allowable to DELIST with at
least 90% confidence.
|
|
Sample Sizes
|
Maximum # of Samples not meeting a criterion
allowable for delisting
|
Sample sizes
|
Maximum # of Samples not meeting a criterion
allowable for delisting
|
|
From
|
To
|
From
|
To
|
|
30
|
37
|
0
|
279
|
289
|
21
|
|
38
|
51
|
1
|
290
|
300
|
22
|
|
52
|
64
|
2
|
301
|
311
|
23
|
|
65
|
77
|
3
|
312
|
323
|
24
|
|
78
|
90
|
4
|
324
|
334
|
25
|
|
91
|
103
|
5
|
335
|
345
|
26
|
|
104
|
115
|
6
|
346
|
356
|
27
|
|
116
|
127
|
7
|
357
|
367
|
28
|
|
128
|
139
|
8
|
368
|
378
|
29
|
|
140
|
151
|
9
|
379
|
389
|
30
|
|
152
|
163
|
10
|
390
|
401
|
31
|
|
164
|
174
|
11
|
402
|
412
|
32
|
|
175
|
186
|
12
|
413
|
423
|
33
|
|
187
|
198
|
13
|
424
|
434
|
34
|
|
199
|
209
|
14
|
435
|
445
|
35
|
|
210
|
221
|
15
|
446
|
456
|
36
|
|
222
|
232
|
16
|
457
|
467
|
37
|
|
233
|
244
|
17
|
468
|
478
|
38
|
|
245
|
255
|
18
|
479
|
489
|
39
|
|
256
|
266
|
19
|
490
|
500
|
40
|
|
267
|
278
|
20
|
|
|
|
(n)
For waters listed due to failure to meet aquatic life use support pursuant to
paragraph
62-303.320(7)(b),
F.A.C., the water shall be delisted when the applicable criteria are met for at
least three consecutive years and there are new data available for the same
seasons in which the previous exceedances occurred.
(o) For waterbodies listed on the Verified
List, the water shall be delisted from the Verified List for a given parameter
and added to the Study List when subsequent analysis demonstrates that the
cause of the impairment was incorrect and therefore, the cause of the
impairment is unknown.
(p) For
waters listed based on the 30-day average DO criterion for predominantly marine
waters or the 30-day average ammonia criterion, the waterbody shall be delisted
when the monthly average meets the criterion for at least three consecutive
years and there are new data available for the same seasons in which the
criterion was previously not achieved.
(q) For waters listed based on the weekly
average DO criterion for predominantly marine waters, the waterbody shall be
delisted when the weekly average DO criterion is met for at least three
consecutive years and there are new data available for the same seasons in
which the criterion was previously not achieved.