9 Va. Admin. Code § 5-20-180 - Facility and control equipment maintenance or malfunction
A. The provisions
of this section apply to periods of excess emissions resulting from (i) the
shutdown or bypassing, or both, of air pollution control equipment for
necessary scheduled maintenance and (ii) malfunctions or other equipment
failures of any affected facility or related air pollution control
equipment.
B. In case of shutdown
or bypassing, or both, of air pollution control equipment for necessary
scheduled maintenance which results in excess emissions for more than one hour,
the intent to shut down such equipment shall be reported to the board and local
air pollution control agency, if any, at least 24 hours prior to the planned
shutdown. Such prior notice shall include, but is not limited to, the
following:
1. Identification of the specific
facility to be taken out of service as well as its location and permit or
registration number;
2. The
expected length of time that the air pollution control equipment will be out of
service;
3. The nature and quantity
of emissions of air pollutants likely to occur during the shutdown period;
and
4. Measures that will be taken
to minimize the length of the shutdown and to negate the effect of the outage
of the air pollution control equipment.
C. In the event that any affected facility or
related air pollution control equipment fails or malfunctions in such a manner
that may cause excess emissions for more than one hour, the owner shall (i) no
later than four daytime business hours after the malfunction is discovered
notify the board of such failure or malfunction and (ii) within 14 days provide
a written statement giving all pertinent facts, including the estimated
duration of the breakdown and the demonstrations in subsection G of this
section. Owners subject to the requirements of
9VAC5-40-50 C and
9VAC5-50-50 C are not required to
provide the written statement prescribed in this subsection for facilities
subject to the monitoring requirements of
9VAC5-40-40 and
9VAC5-50-40. When the condition
causing the failure or malfunction has been corrected and the facility or
control equipment is again in operation, the owner shall notify the
board.
D. In the event that the
breakdown period cited in subsection C of this section exists or is expected to
exist for 30 days or more, the owner shall, as expeditiously as possible but no
later than 30 days after the failure or malfunction and semi-monthly thereafter
until the failure or malfunction is corrected, submit to the board a written
report containing the following:
1.
Identification of the specific facility that is affected as well as its
location and permit or registration number;
2. The expected length of time that the air
pollution control equipment will be out of service;
3. The nature and quantity of air pollutant
emissions likely to occur during the breakdown period;
4. Measures to be taken to reduce emissions
to the lowest amount practicable during the breakdown period;
5. A statement as to why the owner was unable
to obtain repair parts or perform repairs which would allow compliance with the
Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution within 30 days of
the malfunction or failure;
6. An
estimate, with reasons given, of the duration of the shortage of repairs or
repair parts which would allow compliance with the Regulations for the Control
and Abatement of Air Pollution; and
7. Any other pertinent information as may be
requested by the board.
E. The provisions of subsection D of this
section shall not apply beyond three months of the date of the malfunction or
failure. Should the breakdown period exist past the three-month period, the
owner may apply for a variance in accordance with
9VAC5-20-50 A.
F. The following special provisions govern
facilities which are subject to the provisions of Article 5 (9VAC5-50-400 et seq.) of Part II of
9VAC5-50 or Article 1 (9VAC5-60-60 et seq.)
or Article 2 (9VAC5-60-90 et seq.) of Part II of
9VAC5-60:
1. For sources subject to the
applicable subparts listed in
9VAC5-50-410, any provisions
governing malfunctions shall be implemented through this section. In cases
where there are differences between the provisions of this section and the
provisions of 40 CFR Part 60, the more restrictive provisions shall
apply.
2. For sources subject to
the applicable subparts listed in
9VAC5-60-70, any provisions
governing malfunctions shall be implemented through this section. In cases
where there are differences between the provisions of this section and the
provisions of 40 CFR Part 61, the more restrictive provisions shall
apply.
3. For sources subject to
the applicable subparts listed in
9VAC5-60-100, any provisions
governing malfunctions shall be implemented through this section. In cases
where there are differences between the provisions of this section and the
provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, the more restrictive provisions shall
apply.
G. In accordance
with subsection C of this section, if the excess emissions or cessation of
monitoring activities is due to a malfunction, the owner may demonstrate the
following:
1. The cause of the excess
emissions or cessation of monitoring activities meets the definition of
malfunction provided in
9VAC5-10-20;
2. The procedural requirements of this
section were met or the owner has submitted an acceptable application for a
variance, which is subsequently granted;
3. The owner has taken expeditious and
reasonable measures to minimize emissions during the breakdown
period;
4. The owner has taken
expeditious and reasonable measures to correct the malfunction and return the
facility to a normal operation; and
5. The source is in compliance with related
applicable emission standards or monitoring requirements at least 90% of the
operating time over the most recent 12-month period.
H. Nothing in this section shall be construed
as giving an owner the right to increase temporarily the emission of pollutants
or to circumvent the emission standards or monitoring requirements otherwise
provided in the Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air
Pollution.
I. Regardless of any
other provision of this section, the owner of any facility subject to the
Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution shall, upon request
of the board, reduce the level of operation at the facility if the board
determines that this is necessary to prevent a violation of any primary ambient
air quality standard. Under worst case conditions, the board may order that the
owner shut down the facility if there is no other method of operation to avoid
a violation of the primary ambient air quality standard. The board reserves the
right to prescribe the method of determining if a facility will cause such a
violation. In such cases, the facility shall not be returned to operation until
it and the associated air pollution control equipment are able to operate
without violation of any primary ambient air quality standard.
J. Any owner of an affected facility subject
to the provisions of this section shall maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any bypass, malfunction, shutdown or failure of the facility or its
associated air pollution control equipment that results in excess emissions for
more than one hour. The records shall be maintained in a form suitable for
inspection and maintained for at least two years (unless a longer period is
specified in the applicable emission standard) following the date of the
occurrence.
Notes
Statutory Authority: § 10.1-1308 of the Code of Virginia; §§ 110 and 182 of the federal Clean Air Act; 40 CFR Part 51.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.