Wash. Admin. Code § 495A-121-063 - Appeals of disciplinary action
For complaints involving alleged violations of Title IX refer to chapter 495A-115 WAC. For other disciplinary actions:
(1) The respondent may appeal a disciplinary
action by filing a written notice of appeal with the conduct review officer
within ten days of service of the student conduct officer's decision. Failure
to timely file a notice of appeal constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal,
and the student conduct officer's decision is deemed final.
(2) The notice of appeal must include a brief
statement explaining why the respondent is seeking review.
(3) The parties to an appeal are the
respondent and the conduct review officer.
(4) A respondent who appeals a disciplinary
action within the ten days of service or whose case is referred to the
student/faculty disciplinary committee has a right to a prompt, fair, and
impartial hearing as provided for in these procedures.
(5) On appeal the college bears the burden of
establishing the evidentiary facts underlying the imposition of a disciplinary
sanction by a preponderance of the evidence.
(6) Imposition of disciplinary action for
violation of the student conduct code will be delayed pending appeal, unless
the respondent has been summarily suspended.
(7) The student/faculty disciplinary
committee shall hear appeals from:
(a) The
imposition of disciplinary suspensions in excess of ten days;
(b) Dismissals; and
(c) Discipline cases referred to the
committee by the student conduct officer, the conduct review officer, or the
president.
(8) Student
conduct appeals from the imposition of the following disciplinary sanctions
shall be reviewed through a brief adjudicative proceeding:
(a) Suspensions of ten days or
less;
(b) Disciplinary
probation;
(c) Written reprimands;
and
(d) Any conditions or terms
imposed in conjunction with one of the foregoing disciplinary
actions.
(9) Except as
provided elsewhere in these rules, disciplinary warnings and dismissals of
disciplinary actions are final action and are not subject to appeal.
(10) Brief adjudicative proceedings and the
initial hearing shall be conducted by a conduct review officer. The conduct
review officer will not participate in any case in which:
(a) The individual is involved as a
complainant or witness;
(b) There
is direct or personal interest, prejudice, or bias; or
(c) The conduct review officer has taken
previous actions in an advisory capacity.
(11) The parties to a brief adjudicative
proceeding are the respondent and the college, represented by the student
conduct officer. Before taking action, the conduct review officer will conduct
an informal hearing and provide the party:
(a)
An opportunity to be informed of the college's view of the matter;
and
(b) An opportunity to explain
the party's view of the matter.
(12) The conduct review officer will service
an initial decision upon both the respondent and the student conduct officer
within ten days of the completion of the informal hearing. The initial decision
contains a brief written statement of the reasons for the decision and
information about how to seek administrative review of the initial decision. If
no request for review is filed within ten days of service of the initial
decision, the initial decision is deemed the final decision.
(13) If upon review the conduct review
officer determines that the respondent's conduct may warrant imposition of a
disciplinary suspension of more than ten days or dismissal, the matter will be
referred to the student/faculty disciplinary committee for a disciplinary
hearing.
(14) An initial decision
from the brief adjudica-tive proceeding is subject to review by the president
provided a party files a written request for review with the conduct review
officer within ten days of service of the initial decision.
(15) The president will not participate in
any case in which:
(a) They were involved as a
complainant or witness;
(b) There
is direct or personal interest, prejudice or bias; or
(c) Previous actions have been taken in an
advisory capacity.
(16)
During the review, the president will give each party an opportunity to file
written responses explaining their view of the matter and will make any
inquiries necessary to ascertain whether the sanctions should be modified or
whether the proceedings should be referred to the student/faculty disciplinary
committee for a formal adjudicative hearing.
(17) The decision on review must be in
writing, must include a brief statement of the reason for the decision, and
must be served on the parties within twenty calendar days of the initial
decision or of the request for review, whichever is later. The decision on
review will contain a notice that judicial review may be available. If the
president does not make a disposition of the matter within twenty calendar days
after the request is submitted, a request for review is deemed
denied.
(18) If upon review the
president determines that the imposed sanctions are insufficient and that the
respondent's conduct may warrant imposition of a heightened disciplinary
suspension of more than ten days or dismissal, the matter will be referred to
the student/faculty disciplinary committee for a disciplinary
hearing.
Notes
Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.50.140(10). 00-11-147, § 495A-121-063, filed 5/24/00, effective 6/24/00.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.