Skip to main content

El artículo 331: Código Penal de la República Dominicana, Violación

Article 331: Penal Code of the Dominican Republic, Rape

Article 331 defines rape as any act of sexual penetration, in any way, that is committed against another person through violence, constraint, threat or surprise. Rape is punishable by 10 to 15 years of imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 to 200,000 Dominican pesos (RD$100,000.00 to RD$200,000.00) However, the maximum sentence increases to 20 years for rape of minors or a person with a mental or physical disability.

 

El artículo 309-3: Código Penal de la República Dominicana, Penalidades para Violencia Doméstica o Violencia contra las Mujeres

Article 309-3: Penal Code of the Dominican Republic, Penalties for Domestic Violence and Violence against Women

Article 309-3 establishes a prison sentence of five to ten years for violent acts against women or family, if any of the following conditions are true:

The perpetrator broke into the victim’s home;

The perpetrator caused grave bodily harm to victim;

The perpetrator carried a weapon without intention to kill or mutilate;

El artículo 309-2: Código Penal de la República Dominicana, Violencia Doméstica o Intrafamiliar

Article 309-2: Penal Code of the Dominican Republic, Domestic or Intrafamily Violence

Article 309-2 classifies domestic or intrafamily violence as any conduct that employs physical force, psychological or verbal violence, intimidation or persecution against family members, spouse, ex-spouse, consensual partner, someone with whom the perpetrator cohabitates, or the parent of the perpetrator’s child.

El artículo 309-1: Código Penal de la República Dominicana, Violencia contra las Mujeres

Article 309-1: Penal Code of the Dominican Republic, Violence against Women

Article 309-1 provides that violence against women means any public or private act or conduct, motivated by a woman’s gender, that causes physical, sexual, or psychological harm or suffering to a woman, by physical force, verbal or psychological violence, intimidation or persecution.

 

El artículo 194: Código Penal de la República Dominicana, Matrimonio para Viudas

Article 194: Penal Code of the Dominican Republic, Marriage for Widows

Article 194 provides that any Civil State Official who authorizes the marriage of a widowed woman within 10 months from the death of the widow’s spouse, in violation of the Civil Code regulations for remarriage of widows, is subject to a fine of 20 to 100 Dominican pesos (RD$20.00 to RD$100.00).

 

Código Civil de la República Dominicana

Civil Code of the Dominican Republic

The Civil Code of the Dominican Republic establishes that married women have all the same rights as unmarried women and vice versa. A woman has the right to work without the permission of her husband. A woman also has the right to mortgage or sell her property without the consent of her husband. A married woman has the right to manage and dispose of her earnings. A woman has the right to enter into debt without the permission of her husband.

 

Código de Trabajo de la República Dominicana

Work Code of the Dominican Republic Title 1

The Work Code of the Dominican Republic recognizes that women have the same rights as men with regards to protections at work. The code also establishes that firing a woman for being pregnant is void. If a woman is terminated while pregnant, or within six months after delivery, the employer must submit such termination to the Department of Labor so that they may determine if she was terminated due to her pregnancy.

Constitución Política de la República Dominicana de 2015

Constitution of the Dominican Republic of 2015

The Constitution sets forth the Dominican Republic’s fundamental principles, values, norms, and guarantees. Various constitutional precepts establish equality between men and women. Article 55 establishes the equal right to marry and form a family with both spouses having the same rights and obligations. Article 62 provides for equal rights in terms of work, including the type, quality, quantity and retribution for work performed.

A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279

Issues

Do disabled child plaintiffs who claim that a K-12 school discriminated against them based on their disability need to satisfy a higher burden of proof than other types of plaintiffs when bringing a claim of discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act?

This case asks the Supreme Court to determine which standard to apply to claims of disability discrimination against students in K-12 schools under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) and Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Currently, multiple federal circuit courts apply the “bad faith or gross misconduct” standard, which is a higher standard than the “deliberate indifference” standard. A.T. and G.T., on behalf of their minor daughter A.J.T., argue that the “deliberate indifference” standard is more consistent with the text of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act and with the meaning of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”). Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279, and Osseo School Board counter that the precedential case that applied the “bad faith or gross misconduct” standard is still good law, and the standard does not rely on IDEA but instead a proper reading of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act. The outcome of this case has implications for the protection of students with disabilities against discrimination while in K-12 public schools.

Questions as Framed for the Court by the Parties

Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Rehabilitation Act of 1973 require children with disabilities to satisfy a uniquely stringent “bad faith or gross misjudgment” standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education. 

A.J.T. suffers from Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, a type of epilepsy that causes seizures and diminished intellectual capacities. A.J.T. v.

Additional Resources

Submit for publication
0
Subscribe to